Claim · model-written summary
W2N2 and W2N3 significantly outperformed CK in dry matter accumulation and ornamental value, with increases of 7.20% to 153.47%
ZinniaVerbatim
t0“ornamental traits of Zinnia”
e1“the W2N2 and W2N3 treatments significantly ( P < 0.05) outperformed the CK and other treatments in terms of dry matter accumulation and ornamental value, with increases ranging from 7.20% to 153.47%”
e2“Using the tall Zinnia variety “Pink Dream” as the experimental material, a two-year field experiment was conducted in the oasis area of Hexi Corridor”
Title
Zhen Xu; Hengjia Zhang; Xietian Chen; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1785249
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect W2N2 gave significantly higher photosynthetic assimilation capacity and physiological and biochemical indicators than CK, an increase of 8.76% to 45.50%
- Intervention effect W1N1 decreased leaf area and photosynthetic rate of Zinnia
- Intervention effect W1N1 decreased growth and physiological-biochemical indicators of Zinnia
- Intervention effect W1N1 reduced Zinnia nutrient deficiency
- Intervention effect W3N3 did not enhance the above indicators of Zinnia
- Intervention effect W3N3 reduced the ornamental value of Zinnia
- Intervention effect Increasing the nitrogen rate from N1 to N3 increased total nitrogen (TN) in the 0–60 cm soil layer by 14.51% on average
- Intervention effect Increasing the nitrogen rate from N1 to N3 increased soil organic matter (SOM) in the 0–60 cm soil layer by 37.56% on average
- Intervention effect Raising the irrigation level from W1 to W3 increased total nitrogen (TN) content by 7.10%
- Intervention effect Raising the irrigation level from W1 to W3 increased soil organic matter (SOM) content by 26.92%
- Method / resource Entropy weight-TOPSIS evaluation identified W2N2 as the optimal regime, with a score of 0.988