Rhinanthus minor 238 claims

Claim · model-written summary

R. minor exhibited narrow germination niches, suggesting higher vulnerability to warming.

Taxon

R. minorRhinanthus minore0

Outcome

germination nichese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“R. minor exhibited narrow germination niches”

Claim · model-written summary

Host species identity strongly influenced parasite biomass and other traits.

Taxon

Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophusRhinanthus minorRhinanthus alectorolophuse1

Treatment

host species identitye2

Outcome

parasite biomasse2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“the model root hemiparasites Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophus were grown with 25 host species”

e2

“Host species identity strongly influenced parasite biomass and other traits”

Claim · model-written summary

Both parasites grew better with legumes and grasses than with forbs.

Taxon

Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophusRhinanthus minorRhinanthus alectorolophuse1

Interactor

legumes and grassese2host

Outcome

grewe2

Direction

bettere2

Comparator

forbse2

Verbatim

e1

“the model root hemiparasites Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophus were grown with 25 host species”

e2

“both parasites grew better with legumes and grasses than with forbs”

Claim · model-written summary

The negative effect of R. minor on host biomass was less strong than that of R. alectorolophus.

Taxon

R. minorRhinanthus minore0

Outcome

host biomasse0

Direction

less stronge0

Comparator

R. alectorolophuse0

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effect of R. minor on host biomass was less strong than that of R. alectorolophus”

Claim · model-written summary

The negative effect of R. minor on host biomass was stronger relative to its own biomass.

Taxon

R. minorRhinanthus minore0

Outcome

host biomasse0

Direction

strongere1

Qualifier

relative to its own biomasse1

Comparator

its own biomasse1

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effect of R. minor on host biomass was less strong than that of R. alectorolophus”

e1

“but stronger relative to its own biomass, suggesting that it is more parasitic”

Claim · model-written summary

The impact of the two parasites on individual hosts did not depend on nutrient level.

Taxon

Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophusRhinanthus minorRhinanthus alectorolophuse1

Treatment

nutrient levele2

Outcome

impacte2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“the model root hemiparasites Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophus were grown with 25 host species”

e2

“The impact of the two parasites on individual hosts did not depend on nutrient level and was correlated”

Claim · model-written summary

The impact of the two parasites on individual hosts was correlated.

Taxon

Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophusRhinanthus minorRhinanthus alectorolophuse1

Interactor

individual hostse2host

Outcome

impacte2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“the model root hemiparasites Rhinanthus minor and R. alectorolophus were grown with 25 host species”

e2

“The impact of the two parasites on individual hosts did not depend on nutrient level and was correlated”

Claim · model-written summary

R. minor slightly reduced mean overall productivity.

Taxon

R. minorRhinanthus minore0

Outcome

mean overall productivitye0

Direction

reducede0

Qualifier

slightlye0

Verbatim

e0

“While R. minor slightly reduced mean overall productivity”

Claim · model-written summary

Germination under laboratory conditions was much lower for the F1 hybrid formed on R. major than for the reciprocal hybrid formed on R. minor.

Taxon

Rhinanthus minor and Rhinanthus majorRhinanthus minorRhinanthus majort0

Material

F 1 hybrid formed on R. majore1

Outcome

Germinatione1

Direction

much lowere1

Comparator

reciprocal hybrid formed on R. minore1

Setting

laboratory conditionse1

Verbatim

t0

“Fitness of reciprocal F 1 hybrids between Rhinanthus minor and Rhinanthus major under controlled conditions and in the field”

e1

“Germination under laboratory conditions was much lower for the F 1 hybrid formed on R. major compared with the reciprocal hybrid formed on R. minor”

Claim · model-written summary

The germination difference between reciprocal hybrids was not found under field conditions.

Taxon

Rhinanthus minor and Rhinanthus majorRhinanthus minorRhinanthus majort0

Outcome

differencee2

Direction

not founde2

Setting

field conditionse2

Verbatim

t0

“Fitness of reciprocal F 1 hybrids between Rhinanthus minor and Rhinanthus major under controlled conditions and in the field”

e2

“However, this difference was not found under field conditions”