By organism › Green plants › Viscaceae › Phoradendron leucarpum

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume1
Outcome: Mistletoe was detectede0
Value: 10 of 32 surveyed tree speciese0

Verbatim

e0
“Mistletoe was detected in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–828

e1
“bigleaf mistletoe’s ( Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–486

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.
Association Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.
Association Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.
Observation Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.
Association Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.
Association Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume1
Outcome: Mistletoe presencee0
Direction: did not varye0
Comparator: land-uses or tree originse0

Verbatim

e0
“Mistletoe presence did not vary across land-uses or tree origins (i.e., native vs. non-native trees)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–930

e1
“Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–484

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.
Association Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.
Association Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.
Observation Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.
Association Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.
Association Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume1
Interactor: treese0host
Outcome: infestation levelse0
Direction: higheste0
Qualifier: larger and nonnativee0

Verbatim

e0
“infestation levels were highest on larger and nonnative trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1002

e1
“Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–484

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.
Association Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.
Association Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.
Observation Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.
Association Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.
Association Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume1
Interactor: Birde0other
Outcome: Bird species richness and abundancee0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: trees with mistletoee0

Verbatim

e0
“Bird species richness and abundance were higher in trees with mistletoe”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1075

e1
“Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–484

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.
Association Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.
Association Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.
Observation Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.
Association Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.
Association Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume2
Interactor: insectivorous gleaning speciese0other
Outcome: pattern driven by insectivorous gleaning speciese0

Verbatim

e0
“a pattern driven by insectivorous gleaning species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1127

e1
“Bird species richness and abundance were higher in trees with mistletoe”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1075

e2
“Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–484

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.
Association Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.
Association Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.
Association Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.
Association Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.
Association Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume1
Interactor: BirdsAvese0other
Outcome: Birds were more likely to be observed foraginge0
Direction: more likelye0
Setting: natural arease0

Verbatim

e0
“Birds were more likely to be observed foraging in trees with mistletoe in natural areas but not urban areas”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1236

e1
“Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–484

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.
Association Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.
Association Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.
Association Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.
Observation Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.
Association Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foraging or gleaning birds used mistletoe more often than perching birds.

Taxon: Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllumPhoradendron leucarpume1
Interactor: birdsAvese0other
Outcome: use mistletoee0
Direction: more likelye0
Comparator: birds observed perchinge0

Verbatim

e0
“birds observed foraging or gleaning were more likely to use mistletoe compared to birds observed perching”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1352

e1
“Phoradendron leucarpum spp. macrophyllum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–484

Title

Mistletoe-bearing trees positively influence bird foraging patterns across urban and natural environments

Kees W. Hood; Frank Fabbro; Daniel S. Karp Urban Ecosystems 2025. doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01714-6

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mistletoe occurred in 10 of 32 surveyed tree species.
Association Mistletoe presence did not vary across land uses or tree origins.
Association Mistletoe infestation was highest on larger and nonnative trees.
Association Bird richness and abundance were higher in mistletoe-bearing trees.
Observation Insectivorous gleaning species drove the higher bird counts.
Association Birds were more likely to forage in mistletoe-bearing trees in natural areas.
Recommendation Managers should balance biodiversity benefits with tree health effects.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forested wetland habitat positively predicted American mistletoe occurrence after accounting for hosts and regional host use.

Taxon: American mistletoePhoradendron leucarpume0
Outcome: American mistletoe occurrencee0
Direction: positivee0
Qualifier: after accounting for both variation in host availability and differences among regions in host usee0
Setting: forested wetland habitate0

Verbatim

e0
“positive effect of forested wetland habitat on American mistletoe occurrence after accounting for both variation in host availability and differences among regions in host use”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–585

Title

Variation in establishment success for American mistletoe [Phoradendron leucarpum (Raf.) Reveal & M.C. Johnst. (Viscaceae)] appears most likely to predict its distribution in Virginia and North Carolina, United States

Nicholas P. Flanders; Christopher P. Randle; Eric L. Walters; et al. Botany 2023. doi:10.1139/cjb-2023-0050

Other claims from this paper (3)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light availability predicted American mistletoe establishment rates.

Taxon: American mistletoePhoradendron leucarpumt0
Treatment: Light availabilitye0
Outcome: establishment ratese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Light availability predicted establishment rates”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–878

t0
“American mistletoe”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57

Title

Variation in establishment success for American mistletoe [Phoradendron leucarpum (Raf.) Reveal & M.C. Johnst. (Viscaceae)] appears most likely to predict its distribution in Virginia and North Carolina, United States

Nicholas P. Flanders; Christopher P. Randle; Eric L. Walters; et al. Botany 2023. doi:10.1139/cjb-2023-0050

Other claims from this paper (3)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy openness did not predict mistletoe seed germination rates.

Taxon: American mistletoePhoradendron leucarpumt0
Treatment: % canopy opennesse0
Outcome: seed germination ratese0
Direction: did not predicte0

Verbatim

e0
“% canopy openness did not predict seed germination rates”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–939

t0
“American mistletoe”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57

Title

Variation in establishment success for American mistletoe [Phoradendron leucarpum (Raf.) Reveal & M.C. Johnst. (Viscaceae)] appears most likely to predict its distribution in Virginia and North Carolina, United States

Nicholas P. Flanders; Christopher P. Randle; Eric L. Walters; et al. Botany 2023. doi:10.1139/cjb-2023-0050

Other claims from this paper (3)

Phoradendron leucarpum 88 claims

88 claims