Mayetiola destructor 13 claims

species · family Cecidomyiidae · animal · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Common name: Hessian fly — Also written in claims: Hessian Fly — NCBI synonyms: Cecidomyia destructor

2 spellings

Mayetiola destructorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k4193-19 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

13 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Family-1 putative effectors were produced exclusively in the basal region of Hessian fly larval salivary glands.

Taxon: Hessian flyMayetiola destructort0
Organ / stage: larval salivary glandse0
Outcome: exclusively produced in the basal region of larval salivary glandse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Family‐1 putative effectors were exclusively produced in the basal region of larval salivary glands”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–628

t0
“Hessian fly candidate effectors in resistant and susceptible wheat plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–102

Title

Differential localization of Hessian fly candidate effectors in resistant and susceptible wheat plants

Zainab Aljbory; Michael J. Aikins; Yoonseong Park; et al. Plant Direct 2020. doi:10.1002/pld3.246

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.

Taxon: Mayetiola destructorMayetiola destructore1
Treatment: simulated drying conditions for 1-7 de0
Outcome: percentage of total adults emerging from pupariae0
Qualifier: 1 September, Kittitas Valley, WA; 3 June, East Columbia Basin, WA; 15 May and 15 July, San Joaquin Valley, CA; and 15 May, 20 July, and 15 September, Imperial Valley, CAe0
Setting: environmental chamberse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Regression lines for percentage of total adults emerging from puparia exposed to simulated drying conditions for 1-7 d in environmental chambers was significant for 1 September, Kittitas Valley, WA; 3 June, East Columbia Basin, WA; 15 May and 15 July, San Joaquin Valley, CA; and 15 May, 20 July, and 15 September, Imperial Valley, CA.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–726

e1
“Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) puparia are of regulatory concern in exported hay”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: open air drying on location for 1-7 de0
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 0.4%e0
Qualifier: 18 Junee0
Comparator: controlse0
Setting: Kittitas Valleye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In open air drying on location for 1-7 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was 0.4% for 18 June, Kittitas Valley; 1.2% for 15 May, San Joaquin Valley; and 0% for 16 July, Imperial Valley; and significantly different between controls and exposure durations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1020

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: open air drying on location for 1-7 de0
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 1.2%e0
Qualifier: 15 Maye0
Comparator: controlse0
Setting: San Joaquin Valleye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In open air drying on location for 1-7 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was 0.4% for 18 June, Kittitas Valley; 1.2% for 15 May, San Joaquin Valley; and 0% for 16 July, Imperial Valley; and significantly different between controls and exposure durations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1020

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: open air drying on location for 1-7 de0
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 0%e0
Qualifier: 16 Julye0
Comparator: controlse0
Setting: Imperial Valleye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In open air drying on location for 1-7 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was 0.4% for 18 June, Kittitas Valley; 1.2% for 15 May, San Joaquin Valley; and 0% for 16 July, Imperial Valley; and significantly different between controls and exposure durations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1020

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: hay windrow drying for 1-6 de0
Interactor: Phleum pretensee0host
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 5.4%e0
Qualifier: 28 Junee0
Comparator: controlse1
Setting: Kittitas Valleye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In hay windrow drying for 1-6 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was 5.4% on 28 June and 24.2% on 7 September in timothy, Phleum pretense, in the Kittitas Valley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1220

e1
“The number of puparia surviving to adults in open air drying and in windrows was significantly different between controls and exposure durations for all test dates and locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1615

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: hay windrow drying for 1-6 de0
Interactor: Phleum pretensee0host
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 24.2%e0
Qualifier: 7 Septembere0
Comparator: controlse1
Setting: Kittitas Valleye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In hay windrow drying for 1-6 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was 5.4% on 28 June and 24.2% on 7 September in timothy, Phleum pretense, in the Kittitas Valley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1220

e1
“The number of puparia surviving to adults in open air drying and in windrows was significantly different between controls and exposure durations for all test dates and locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1615

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: hay windrow drying for 1-6 de0
Interactor: timothyPhleum pratensee1host
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 3.8%e1
Qualifier: 28 Junee1
Comparator: controlse2
Setting: East Columbia Basine1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In hay windrow drying for 1-6 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1127

e1
“3.8% on 28 June in timothy in the East Columbia Basin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1275

e2
“The number of puparia surviving to adults in open air drying and in windrows was significantly different between controls and exposure durations for all test dates and locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1615

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: hay windrow drying for 1-6 de0
Interactor: Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1host
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 2.2%e1
Qualifier: 20 Julye1
Comparator: controlse2
Setting: San Joaquin Valleye1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In hay windrow drying for 1-6 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1127

e1
“2.2% on 20 July in alfalfa, Medicago sativa, in the San Joaquin Valley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1347

e2
“The number of puparia surviving to adults in open air drying and in windrows was significantly different between controls and exposure durations for all test dates and locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1615

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrow drying survival in Sudan grass was 6.3% on 21 July in Imperial Valley.

Taxon: Hessian FlyMayetiola destructort0
Treatment: hay windrow drying for 1-6 de0
Interactor: Sorghum bicolor sudanensisSorghum bicolore1host
Outcome: total percentage of puparia surviving to adultse0
Value: 6.3%e1
Qualifier: 21 Julye1
Comparator: controlse2
Setting: Imperial Valleye1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In hay windrow drying for 1-6 d, total percentage of puparia surviving to adults for all exposure days was”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1127

e1
“6.3% on 21 July in Sudan grass, Sorghum bicolor sudanensis, in the Imperial Valley.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1436

e2
“The number of puparia surviving to adults in open air drying and in windrows was significantly different between controls and exposure durations for all test dates and locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1615

t0
“Hessian Fly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

Survival of Hessian Fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Puparia Exposed to Simulated Hay Harvest Conditions, Location and Windrow Drying in Washington and California

Victoria Y. Yokoyama; Sue E. Cambron Journal of Economic Entomology 2013. doi:10.1603/ec12403

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Adult emergence regressions under simulated drying were significant for specified dates in four Washington and California locations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival to adults was 0.4% for 18 June in Kittitas Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 1.2% for 15 May in San Joaquin Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Open-air drying survival was 0% for 16 July in Imperial Valley and differed significantly from controls across exposure durations.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 5.4% on 28 June in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 24.2% on 7 September in Kittitas Valley.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in timothy was 3.8% on 28 June in East Columbia Basin.
Intervention effect Windrow drying survival in alfalfa was 2.2% on 20 July in San Joaquin Valley.
Association Hessian fly puparial survival in field tests was related to mild temperatures and high humidity.