By organism › Green plants › Poaceae › Festuca

Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The updated taxonomy is based on two monophyletic main genera, Lolium and Festuca.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae1
Outcome: taxonomic concepte1
Qualifier: based on two monophyletic main genera, Lolium and Festucae1

Verbatim

e1
“This resulted in a taxonomic concept based on two monophyletic main genera, Lolium and Festuca”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–379

Title

An update on the taxonomy of Festuca (Poaceae) with a focus on Central European taxa

Englmaier, Peter Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19372124

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

New names and combinations are provided for the updated Festuca taxonomy.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae1
Outcome: new names and combinationse2

Verbatim

e1
“This resulted in a taxonomic concept based on two monophyletic main genera, Lolium and Festuca”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–379

e2
“New names and combinations required by this updated taxonomy are provided”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–799

Title

An update on the taxonomy of Festuca (Poaceae) with a focus on Central European taxa

Englmaier, Peter Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19372124

Other claims from this paper (2)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A Festuca spp. mix followed the leading perennial inter-row mix.

Taxon: Festuca spp.Festucae0
Outcome: followede0
Value: 0.65–0.69e0

Verbatim

e0
“followed by a Festuca spp. mix (RC i = 0.65–0.69)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1693

Title

Defining screening criteria and ranking in-row and inter-row cover crops for irrigated vineyards using a hybrid AHP–TOPSIS model

Mehdi Sharifi; Abbas Sayyad; Eman El Sayed Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1695610

Other claims from this paper (13)

Method / resource In both vineyards, invasiveness risk was among the most influential selection criteria, at about 43–60%.
Method / resource Interference with fruiting zones was also among the most influential criteria, at about 30%.
Method / resource Lens culinaris was a top under-vine annual with high relative closeness.
Method / resource Brassica napus cv. Winfred was a top under-vine annual with high relative closeness.
Method / resource Brassica rapa was a top under-vine annual with high relative closeness.
Method / resource Ladino Trifolium repens cv. Crescendo ranked highest among perennial under-vine covers.
Method / resource The Pisum sativum and Secale cereale mix led inter-row covers at CFF.
Method / resource The Pisum sativum and Secale cereale mix placed second at KOW.
Method / resource Trifolium incarnatum ranked second at CFF.
Method / resource Trifolium alexandrinum led at KOW.
Method / resource Other annual clovers had intermediate closeness and performed best at finer, cooler, moister sites.
Method / resource Lolium perenne and Raphanus sativus var. longipinnatus was the leading perennial inter-row mix.
Method / resource The MCDA produced rankings to guide regional cover-crop choices.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Impregnated fiberboard increased Festuca aboveground biomass relative to untreated pots.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae0
Treatment: 5 fiberboard blocks, impregnated successively with the urea fertilizer and reclaimed polystyrene solutionse1
Outcome: above ground biomasse0
Direction: moree0
Comparator: control pots (A-pots)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that the B-pots produced more above ground biomass of the plants Festuca than the control pots (A-pots).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1221

e1
“pots where 5 fiberboard blocks, impregnated successively with the urea fertilizer and reclaimed polystyrene solutions, were put in pots to act as a slow-release fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–606

Title

Use of low density fiberboards composites, impregnated with urea and recycled polystyrene, as slow release fertilizers in growing plants

Eleni Voulgaridou; Dafni Foti; Sotirios Karastergiou; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2026. doi:10.1080/01904167.2026.2631602

Other claims from this paper (1)

Recommendation The authors conclude treated fiberboard samples could serve as slow release fertilizers.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude treated fiberboard samples could serve as slow release fertilizers.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae1
Outcome: slow release fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0
“small fiberboard samples, being treated with urea and reclaimed polystyrene solution, have the potential to act as slow release fertilizers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1383

e1
“biomass of the plants Festuca”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1189

Title

Use of low density fiberboards composites, impregnated with urea and recycled polystyrene, as slow release fertilizers in growing plants

Eleni Voulgaridou; Dafni Foti; Sotirios Karastergiou; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2026. doi:10.1080/01904167.2026.2631602

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Impregnated fiberboard increased Festuca aboveground biomass relative to untreated pots.

Observationobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Comparable growth promotion has been reported for Festuca species.

Taxon: Festuca speciesFestucae0
Outcome: growth-promoting responsese0

Verbatim

e0
“comparable growth-promoting responses have also been reported for Dactylis glomerata L., Festuca species, and Festulolium hybrids”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1260

Title

Application of Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms (PGPM) to Enhance the Growth of Cool-Season Forage Grasses

Jakub Dobrzyński; Wojciech Stopa; Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska; et al. Agriculture 2026. doi:10.3390/agriculture16050629

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The updated taxonomy recognizes Lolium and Festuca as two monophyletic main genera.

Taxon: Lolium and FestucaLoliumFestucae0
Outcome: two monophyletic main generae0

Verbatim

e0
“a taxonomic concept based on two monophyletic main genera, Lolium and Festuca”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–379

Title

An update on the taxonomy of Festuca (Poaceae) with a focus on Central European taxa

Englmaier, Peter Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19372125

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation Drymochloa is the only relevant basal group in the area covered by the upcoming flora.
Method / resource The paper provides new names and combinations required by the updated taxonomy.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Festuca had greater drought responsiveness and trait plasticity than Lolium.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae0
Treatment: droughte0
Outcome: trait plasticitye0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: Loliume0

Verbatim

e0
“Festuca showed greater responsiveness to drought, exhibiting higher trait plasticity and more pronounced shifts in its microbial communities—particularly in bacteria—than Lolium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1146

Title

Contrasting drought responses in two grassland plant–microbe systems under climate change

Gang Yang; Lisa Capponi; Michael Bahn; et al. Journal of Ecology 2026. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70251

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Festuca microbial communities shifted more under drought than Lolium communities.
Observation Lolium had limited trait plasticity and relatively stable microbiomes.
Association Lolium had consistently higher rhizosphere fungal richness.
Intervention effect Warming and elevated CO2 partly mitigated drought-related bacterial richness declines in Festuca rhizosphere.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Festuca microbial communities shifted more under drought than Lolium communities.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae0
Interactor: bacteriaBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome: shifts in its microbial communitiese0
Direction: more pronouncede0
Comparator: Loliume0

Verbatim

e0
“Festuca showed greater responsiveness to drought, exhibiting higher trait plasticity and more pronounced shifts in its microbial communities—particularly in bacteria—than Lolium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1146

Title

Contrasting drought responses in two grassland plant–microbe systems under climate change

Gang Yang; Lisa Capponi; Michael Bahn; et al. Journal of Ecology 2026. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70251

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Festuca had greater drought responsiveness and trait plasticity than Lolium.
Observation Lolium had limited trait plasticity and relatively stable microbiomes.
Association Lolium had consistently higher rhizosphere fungal richness.
Intervention effect Warming and elevated CO2 partly mitigated drought-related bacterial richness declines in Festuca rhizosphere.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming and elevated CO2 partly mitigated drought-related bacterial richness declines in Festuca rhizosphere.

Taxon: FestucaFestucae0
Organ / stage: rhizospheree0
Treatment: Warming and elevated CO 2e0
Interactor: bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome: bacterial richnesse0
Direction: mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Warming and elevated CO 2 partly mitigated drought‐induced declines in bacterial richness, particularly in the Festuca rhizosphere.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1724

Title

Contrasting drought responses in two grassland plant–microbe systems under climate change

Gang Yang; Lisa Capponi; Michael Bahn; et al. Journal of Ecology 2026. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70251

Other claims from this paper (4)

Festuca 781 claims

781 claims