Heliconia 582 claims

genus · family Heliconiaceae · green plant · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

11 spellings

Heliconia
Heliconia · picture of the genus (one of its species)Daniel Ramirez from Honolulu, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-orchid cut flowers were rejected primarily for ants, aphids, mealybugs and scale insects.

Taxon
ginger and heliconiaHeliconiaZingiber officinalee0
Interactor
antsFormicidaee0pest
Outcome
rejectionse0
Qualifier
aphids, mealybugs, and scale insectse0

Verbatim

e0

“rejections primarily due to ants, aphids, mealybugs, and scale insects for non-orchid cut flowers (eg ginger and heliconia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–640

Title

A systems approach to mitigate pest risk for market access of cut flowers exported from Hawaii

Kyeongnam Kim; Dominique Zarders; Eric Tanouye; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 2026. doi:10.1093/jee/toaf284

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual treatments did not completely disinfest heliconia.

Taxon
heliconiaHeliconiae0
Treatment
individual treatments alonee0
Outcome
complete disinfestatione0
Direction
did not achievee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“individual treatments alone did not achieve complete disinfestation of ginger and heliconia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1041

Title

A systems approach to mitigate pest risk for market access of cut flowers exported from Hawaii

Kyeongnam Kim; Dominique Zarders; Eric Tanouye; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 2026. doi:10.1093/jee/toaf284

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment yielded zero detectable infestation over eight harvests in ginger and heliconia.

Taxon
ginger and heliconiaHeliconiaZingiber officinalee1
Treatment
combining them as a systems approache0
Outcome
detectable infestatione0
Direction
zeroe0
Value
zeroe0
Qualifier
8 harvests during the second year of the studye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combining them as a systems approach led to zero detectable infestation across 8 harvests during the second year of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1168
e1

“For targeted trials of ginger and heliconia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–735

Title

A systems approach to mitigate pest risk for market access of cut flowers exported from Hawaii

Kyeongnam Kim; Dominique Zarders; Eric Tanouye; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 2026. doi:10.1093/jee/toaf284

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full sun accelerated sprouting to 17.15 versus 19.47 days.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
acceleratede0
Value
17.15 dayse0
Comparator
19.47 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“full sun accelerated sprouting (17.15 days vs 19.47 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–911
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full sun raised vegetative to flowering shoot conversion to 136.8% versus 105.1%.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
full sune1
Outcome
vegetative-to-flowering shoot conversione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
136.8 %e0
Qualifier
105.1 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced vegetative-to-flowering shoot conversion (136.8 % vs 105.1 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–983
e1

“full sun accelerated sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–884
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full sun raised spikes per clump to 3.68 versus 3.30.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
full sune1
Outcome
spikes per clumpe0
Direction
moree0
Value
3.68e0
Comparator
50 % shade nete0

Verbatim

e0

“produced more spikes per clump (3.68 vs 3.30) as compared to 50 % shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1063
e1

“full sun accelerated sprouting (17.15 days vs 19.47 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–911
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased inflorescence length to 24.23 versus 19.03 inch.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
50 % shadee0
Outcome
inflorescencese0
Direction
longere0
Value
24.23e0
Qualifier
19.03 inche0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“50 % shade significantly improved floral quality, with longer inflorescences (24.23 vs 19.03 inch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1176
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased stalk length to 18.30 versus 14.94 inch.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
50 % shadee1
Outcome
stalkse0
Direction
longere0
Value
18.30e0
Qualifier
14.94 inche0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“longer stalks (18.30 vs 14.94 inch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1213
e1

“50 % shade significantly improved floral quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1126
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade raised chlorophyll content to 6.82 versus 5.09 mg cm-2.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
50 % shadee1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.82e0
Qualifier
5.09 mg cm-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher chlorophyll content (6.82 vs 5.09 mg cm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1264
e1

“50 % shade significantly improved floral quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1126
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade prolonged spike longevity to 16.2 versus 10.3 days.

Taxon
HeliconiaHeliconiat0
Treatment
50 % shadee1
Outcome
spike longevitye0
Direction
prolongede0
Value
16.2e0
Qualifier
10.3 dayse0
Comparator
open sune0

Verbatim

e0

“prolonged spike longevity (16.2 vs 10.3 days) than open sun (100 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1336
e1

“50 % shade significantly improved floral quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1126
t0

“Heliconia cv. Golden Torch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–139

Title

Assessing the planting material size and light intensity levels for maximization of quality flower production in Heliconia cv. Golden Torch

Mohanty Sukirti; Ranjan Mohanty Chitta; Jena Subhendu; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.11605

Other claims from this paper (14)