By organism › Green plants › Pinaceae › Pinus durangensis

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus durangensis dominates the upper canopy of a multistratified forest.

Taxon: Pinus durangensisPinus durangensise1
Organ / stage: upper canopye1
Outcome: multistratified foreste1

Verbatim

e1
“The results revealed a multistratified forest: Pinus durangensis dominates the upper canopy”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–719

Title

Effect of Individual Selection Silvicultural Treatment on the Vertical Structure of a Pine-Oak Forest in Northern Mexico

Joel Rascón-Solano; Samuel Alberto García-García; Rufino Sandoval-García; et al. Ecologies 2025. doi:10.3390/ecologies6040074

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A genetic barrier and population substructure distinguish northern P. durangensis from southern P. martinezii.

Taxon: P. durangensisPinus durangensise0
Outcome: population substructuring and the presence of a genetic barriere0

Verbatim

e0
“We found population substructuring and the presence of a genetic barrier that indicates the presence of two distinct groups: a northern group corresponding to P. durangensis and a southern group representing P. martinezii”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1176

Title

Genetic and Ecological Divergence of Pinus durangensis and Pinus martinezii: Two Endemic Lineages with Contrasting Evolutionary Histories

Rubí Contreras-Bailón; Patricia Delgado-Valerio; Alejandra Moreno-Letelier; et al. International Journal of Plant Sciences 2024. doi:10.1086/734477

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PVP gave the highest measured nursery variables, followed by PBS and PB, which were similar.

Taxon: Pinus durangensisPinus durangensist0
Treatment: PVPe0
Outcome: variables evaluatede0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: PBS and PBe0

Verbatim

e0
“The substrate factor presented statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the variables evaluated, with higher values in PVP, followed by PBS and PB, the latter being similar to each other”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–943

t0
“Pinus durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31

Title

PRODUCTION OF Pinus durangensis Mart. UNDER DIFFERENT SUBSTRATE AND MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION CONDITIONS IN NURSERY

Ricardo Martínez-Casas; José Leonardo García-Rodríguez; Silvia Salcido-Ruiz; et al. Agrociencia 2024. doi:10.47163/agrociencia.v58i4.2960

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect P. tinctorius inoculation gave higher root and total biomass and Dickson’s quality index.
Intervention effect L. laccata inoculation gave the highest mycorrhizal colonization.
Intervention effect PVP with P. tinctorius was the most favorable combination for growth.
Observation PVP substrate cost 28.4% more than PB.
Observation PVP substrate cost 34.6% more than PBS.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. tinctorius inoculation gave higher root and total biomass and Dickson’s quality index.

Taxon: Pinus durangensisPinus durangensist0
Treatment: P. tinctorius was inoculatede0
Interactor: P. tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse0symbiont
Outcome: root and total biomass, Dickson’s quality indexe0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The mycorrhizal inoculation factor showed differences (p ≤ 0.05) in root and total biomass, Dickson’s quality index, and mycorrhizal colonization, obtaining higher values when P. tinctorius was inoculated, except in the last variable, where the application of L. laccata stood out”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1225

t0
“Pinus durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31

Title

PRODUCTION OF Pinus durangensis Mart. UNDER DIFFERENT SUBSTRATE AND MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION CONDITIONS IN NURSERY

Ricardo Martínez-Casas; José Leonardo García-Rodríguez; Silvia Salcido-Ruiz; et al. Agrociencia 2024. doi:10.47163/agrociencia.v58i4.2960

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect PVP gave the highest measured nursery variables, followed by PBS and PB, which were similar.
Intervention effect L. laccata inoculation gave the highest mycorrhizal colonization.
Intervention effect PVP with P. tinctorius was the most favorable combination for growth.
Observation PVP substrate cost 28.4% more than PB.
Observation PVP substrate cost 34.6% more than PBS.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

L. laccata inoculation gave the highest mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon: Pinus durangensisPinus durangensist0
Treatment: application of L. laccatae0
Interactor: L. laccataLaccaria laccatae0symbiont
Outcome: mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction: stood oute0
Comparator: P. tinctoriuse0

Verbatim

e0
“mycorrhizal colonization, obtaining higher values when P. tinctorius was inoculated, except in the last variable, where the application of L. laccata stood out”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1225

t0
“Pinus durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31

Title

PRODUCTION OF Pinus durangensis Mart. UNDER DIFFERENT SUBSTRATE AND MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION CONDITIONS IN NURSERY

Ricardo Martínez-Casas; José Leonardo García-Rodríguez; Silvia Salcido-Ruiz; et al. Agrociencia 2024. doi:10.47163/agrociencia.v58i4.2960

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect PVP gave the highest measured nursery variables, followed by PBS and PB, which were similar.
Intervention effect P. tinctorius inoculation gave higher root and total biomass and Dickson’s quality index.
Intervention effect PVP with P. tinctorius was the most favorable combination for growth.
Observation PVP substrate cost 28.4% more than PB.
Observation PVP substrate cost 34.6% more than PBS.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVP with P. tinctorius was the most favorable combination for growth.

Taxon: Pinus durangensisPinus durangensist0
Treatment: PVP and P. tinctoriuse0
Interactor: P. tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse0symbiont
Outcome: growthe0
Direction: beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The combined effect of PVP and P. tinctorius produced the best growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1492

t0
“Pinus durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31

Title

PRODUCTION OF Pinus durangensis Mart. UNDER DIFFERENT SUBSTRATE AND MYCORRHIZAL INOCULATION CONDITIONS IN NURSERY

Ricardo Martínez-Casas; José Leonardo García-Rodríguez; Silvia Salcido-Ruiz; et al. Agrociencia 2024. doi:10.47163/agrociencia.v58i4.2960

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect PVP gave the highest measured nursery variables, followed by PBS and PB, which were similar.
Intervention effect P. tinctorius inoculation gave higher root and total biomass and Dickson’s quality index.
Intervention effect L. laccata inoculation gave the highest mycorrhizal colonization.
Observation PVP substrate cost 28.4% more than PB.
Observation PVP substrate cost 34.6% more than PBS.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus durangensis was the most representative species in the pine-oak forest.

Taxon: Pinus durangensis MartínezPinus durangensise3
Outcome: most representative speciese3
Setting: northern Mexicoe0

Verbatim

e0
“effect of the selection silvicultural treatment as a function of time, on the horizontal structure of a Pine-Oak Forest in northern Mexico”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–350

e3
“where Pinus durangensis Martínez was the most representative species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1658

Title

Effect of silvicultural treatment of individual selection on the horizontal structure of a pine-oak forest in northern Mexico

Joel RASCÓN-SOLANO; Samuel A. GARCÍA-GARCÍA; Viridiana S. GALVÁN-MORENO; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2023. doi:10.15835/nbha51213082

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both pine species share a similar endophytic bacterial community in roots, phloem and bark.

Taxon: Pinus arizonica and P. durangensisPinus arizonicaPinus durangensise0
Organ / stage: roots, phloem and barke0
Outcome: endophytic communitye1
Qualifier: similare1

Verbatim

e0
“we characterized and compared the endophytic bacterial diversity in roots, phloem and bark of non-attacked saplings of Pinus arizonica and P. durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–735

e1
“Our results showed that both pine species share a similar endophytic community”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1154

Title

Bacteriome from Pinus arizonica and P. durangensis: Diversity, Comparison of Assemblages, and Overlapping Degree with the Gut Bacterial Community of a Bark Beetle That Kills Pines

Roman Gonzalez-Escobedo; Carlos I. Briones-Roblero; Rosa M. Pineda-Mendoza; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2018. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00077

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrosequencing identified seven bacterial phyla, 14 classes, 26 orders, 43 families and 51 genera in the pine endophytes.

Taxon: Pinus arizonica and P. durangensisPinus arizonicaPinus durangensise0
Outcome: bacterial phylae2
Value: seven bacterial phyla, 14 classes, 26 orders, 43 families, and 51 generae2

Verbatim

e0
“we characterized and compared the endophytic bacterial diversity in roots, phloem and bark of non-attacked saplings of Pinus arizonica and P. durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–735

e2
“A total of seven bacterial phyla, 14 classes, 26 orders, 43 families, and 51 genera were identified”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1255

Title

Bacteriome from Pinus arizonica and P. durangensis: Diversity, Comparison of Assemblages, and Overlapping Degree with the Gut Bacterial Community of a Bark Beetle That Kills Pines

Roman Gonzalez-Escobedo; Carlos I. Briones-Roblero; Rosa M. Pineda-Mendoza; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2018. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00077

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacteriaceae was the most abundant bacterial family across all pine samples.

Taxon: Pinus arizonica and P. durangensisPinus arizonicaPinus durangensise0
Outcome: most abundant familye3
Qualifier: Enterobacteriaceaee3

Verbatim

e0
“we characterized and compared the endophytic bacterial diversity in roots, phloem and bark of non-attacked saplings of Pinus arizonica and P. durangensis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–735

e3
“Enterobacteriaceae was the most abundant family across all samples”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1323

Title

Bacteriome from Pinus arizonica and P. durangensis: Diversity, Comparison of Assemblages, and Overlapping Degree with the Gut Bacterial Community of a Bark Beetle That Kills Pines

Roman Gonzalez-Escobedo; Carlos I. Briones-Roblero; Rosa M. Pineda-Mendoza; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2018. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00077

Other claims from this paper (5)

Pinus durangensis 21 claims

21 claims