Paper · 2009 · Caatinga

Technical and economic feasibility of the use of the equipment on air refrigerated stored wheat.

Marcus Bochi da Silva Volk; Adriano Divino Lima Afonso

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It has been recorded that alternative techniques used to keep the product on and control plagues count with a concept that is getting better day by day. It is a chilling process of grains. Therefore, a freezing unit was used in order to cool the environmental air before injecting it into the aeration system of the structure that stores the product. This is an strategy applied to reduce the grains’ temperature to such low values that it can inhibit or even avoid the bugs’ development, also despite the climatic conditions.. This trial was carried out in a storing Plant from a cooperative named CONTRIGUACU, in Palotina-PR, from November, 28 to December, 23 , 2003. Three experimental silos were used. The first one with 5,000 tons static capacity, while the others capacity was of 2,500 tons each. The concluding results showed that the layers reached a final chilling temperature in sequence, which means that, when the first one got into this point the same happened to the next ones. This result points out the existence of a chilling zone that takes part of the inner part of the grains as time passes by due to the temperature gradient among the temperature of the product, the chilling air temperature and the flow of air supplied by the equipment. The specific consume of energy was of 5.12 kW.h/ton of wheat to the first silo and of 4.48 kW.h/ton of wheat the the other ones. It was also recorded the chilling cost, which was of R$ 0.53/ton of chilled wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain layers reached final chilling temperature sequentially.

Treatment
freezing unite1
Outcome
final chilling temperaturee0
Direction
in sequencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the layers reached a final chilling temperature in sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“a freezing unit was used in order to cool the environmental air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–263 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred a chilling zone progressed through the grain over time.

Outcome
chilling zonee0
Qualifier
temperature gradiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the existence of a chilling zone that takes part of the inner part of the grains as time passes by due to the temperature gradient among the temperature of the product, the chilling air temperature and the flow of air supplied by the equipment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific energy use was 5.12 kW.h/ton of wheat in the first silo.

Outcome
specific consume of energye0
Value
5.12 kW.h/ton of wheate0
Setting
first siloe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The specific consume of energy was of 5.12 kW.h/ton of wheat to the first silo and of 4.48 kW.h/ton of wheat the the other ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1388 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific energy use was 4.48 kW.h/ton of wheat in the other silos.

Outcome
specific consume of energye0
Value
4.48 kW.h/ton of wheate0
Setting
other onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The specific consume of energy was of 5.12 kW.h/ton of wheat to the first silo and of 4.48 kW.h/ton of wheat the the other ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1388 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chilling cost was R$ 0.53 per ton of wheat.

Outcome
chilling coste0
Value
R$ 0.53/ton of chilled wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chilling cost, which was of R$ 0.53/ton of chilled wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1471 · show in text ↑

cold · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.