Abstract
In a field experiment in partially reclaimed sadic soil different coated-urea materials, viz gypsum-coated urea, coal tar-coated urea, sulphur-coated urea at 3 levels of N, viz 40,80 and 120 kg/ha were compared with the prilled urea under rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) cropping system. Among coated-urea materials neem cake-coated urea and sulphur-coated urea were at par and significantly superior to the prilled urea with respect to the yield, yield attributes and N uptake and its recovery in rice-wheat system. However. maximum values of all these parameters were recorded with neem cake-coated urea. Grain yield of both the crops at 80 kg.N/ha as neem cake-coated urea and sulphur-coated urea were at par with those obtained with prilled urea at 120 kg N/ha. Average recovery of applied N with neem cake-coated urea was 32.1 and 37.5% in rice and wheat crops as against 20.5 and 27.1 % with prilled urea respectively. Neem cake-coated urea followed by sulphur-coated urea also maintained higher concentrations of NH 4'-N in soil under rice and NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea throughout the crop growth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
neem cake-coated urea was significantly superior to prilled urea for yield, yield attributes, N uptake and recovery.
Verbatim
e0“Among coated-urea materials neem cake-coated urea and sulphur-coated urea were at par and significantly superior to the prilled urea with respect to the yield, yield attributes and N uptake and its recovery in rice-wheat system.”
Claim · model-written summary
sulphur-coated urea was significantly superior to prilled urea for yield, yield attributes, N uptake and recovery.
Verbatim
e0“Among coated-urea materials neem cake-coated urea and sulphur-coated urea were at par and significantly superior to the prilled urea with respect to the yield, yield attributes and N uptake and its recovery in rice-wheat system.”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake-coated urea gave maximum values of these parameters.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- neem cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- maximum valuese0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However. maximum values of all these parameters were recorded with neem cake-coated urea.”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 80 kg.N/ha, neem cake-coated urea gave grain yields at par with prilled urea at 120 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- neem cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 80 kg.N/hae0
- Comparator
- prilled urea at 120 kg N/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield of both the crops at 80 kg.N/ha as neem cake-coated urea and sulphur-coated urea were at par with those obtained with prilled urea at 120 kg N/ha.”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 80 kg.N/ha, sulphur-coated urea gave grain yields at par with prilled urea at 120 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- sulphur-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 80 kg.N/hae0
- Comparator
- prilled urea at 120 kg N/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield of both the crops at 80 kg.N/ha as neem cake-coated urea and sulphur-coated urea were at par with those obtained with prilled urea at 120 kg N/ha.”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Applied N recovery under neem cake-coated urea was 32.1 in rice versus 20.5 with prilled urea.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- neem cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- recovery of applied Ne0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 32.1e0
- Qualifier
- 20.5e0
- Comparator
- prilled ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average recovery of applied N with neem cake-coated urea was 32.1 and 37.5% in rice and wheat crops as against 20.5 and 27.1 % with prilled urea respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Applied N recovery under neem cake-coated urea was 37.5% in wheat versus 27.1 % with prilled urea.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- neem cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- recovery of applied Ne0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 37.5%e0
- Qualifier
- 27.1 %e0
- Comparator
- prilled ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average recovery of applied N with neem cake-coated urea was 32.1 and 37.5% in rice and wheat crops as against 20.5 and 27.1 % with prilled urea respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake-coated urea maintained higher NH 4'-N in soil under rice than prilled urea.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Neem cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- NH 4'-N in soile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- prilled ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neem cake-coated urea followed by sulphur-coated urea also maintained higher concentrations of NH 4'-N in soil under rice and NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea throughout the crop growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake-coated urea maintained higher NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Neem cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- NH 4'-N and N0 3'-Ne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- prilled ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neem cake-coated urea followed by sulphur-coated urea also maintained higher concentrations of NH 4'-N in soil under rice and NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea throughout the crop growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
sulphur-coated urea maintained higher NH 4'-N in soil under rice than prilled urea.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- sulphur-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- NH 4'-N in soile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- prilled ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neem cake-coated urea followed by sulphur-coated urea also maintained higher concentrations of NH 4'-N in soil under rice and NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea throughout the crop growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
sulphur-coated urea maintained higher NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- sulphur-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- NH 4'-N and N0 3'-Ne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- prilled ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neem cake-coated urea followed by sulphur-coated urea also maintained higher concentrations of NH 4'-N in soil under rice and NH 4'-N and N0 3'-N under wheat than prilled urea throughout the crop growth.”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
204 papers more in this group
See all 208 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.