Paper · 2006 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of biofertilizer and nitrogen on wheal (Triticum aestivuvm) and their after effects on succeeding maize (Zea mays) in wheat-maize cropping system

Virendra Kumar; I. P. S. Ahlawat

16
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted during 1997-98 and 1998-99 to evaluate the efficacy of 2 biofertilizers (Rhizobacteria and Azotobacter) and N in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) and their after effects on succeeding maize (Zea mays L.) in wheat-maize cropping sequence at New Delhi, on a sandy loam soil analyzing low in total N and medium in available P and K. Both the biofertilizers being on par caused significant improvement in growth, yield and yield attributes and N uptake in wheat as compared to control. However, no carry over effect of these biofertilizers was observed in the following maize crop.Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only. Application of 120 kg N/ha applied to wheat significantly increased the grain yield (3.98 tonnes/ha) and N uptake (112 kg/ha) in succeeding maize over no N. Direct applied N to maize significantly increased the grain yield (4.55 tonnes/ ha) and N uptake (131.80 kg/ha) in maize up to 120 kg/ha. Over the seasons, the grain yield of maize with 60 kg N/ha increased by 34.73 % over no nitrogen. The corresponding increase in yield with 120 kg N/ha over 60 kg N/ha was 13.78 %. Both the biofertilizers, being on par, recorded higher N uptake and net returns over no biofertilizer in wheat-maize cropping system. The uptake ofN and net returns in this cropping system increased with increasing levels of residual and direct applied N to maize up to 120 kg N/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both biofertilizers improved wheat growth, yield traits and nitrogen uptake relative to control.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
growth, yield and yield attributes and N uptakee0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the biofertilizers being on par caused significant improvement in growth, yield and yield attributes and N uptake in wheat as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biofertilizers had no observed carryover effect on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
carry over effecte0
Direction
no carry over effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no carry over effect of these biofertilizers was observed in the following maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen up to 60 kg/ha increased wheat growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised wheat grain yield to 4.30 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.30 tonnes/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised wheat straw yield to 6.40 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.40 tonnes/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised wheat nitrogen uptake to 101.10 kg/ha.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
101.10 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised wheat net returns to Rs 15 535.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
Rs 15 535e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised wheat benefit–cost ratio to 1.45.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.45e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application markedly increased growth and yield attributes, grain (4.30 tonnes/ha) and straw (6.40 tonnes/ha) yields, N uptake (101.10 kg/ha), net returns (Rs 15 535) and B: C ratio (1.45) in wheat up to 60 kg/ ha only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat nitrogen at 120 kg N/ha increased succeeding maize grain yield to 3.98 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
120 kg N/ha applied to wheate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.98 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
no Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 120 kg N/ha applied to wheat significantly increased the grain yield (3.98 tonnes/ha) and N uptake (112 kg/ha) in succeeding maize over no N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat nitrogen at 120 kg N/ha increased succeeding maize nitrogen uptake to 112 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
120 kg N/ha applied to wheate0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
112 kg/hae0
Comparator
no Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 120 kg N/ha applied to wheat significantly increased the grain yield (3.98 tonnes/ha) and N uptake (112 kg/ha) in succeeding maize over no N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct maize nitrogen increased grain yield to 4.55 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Direct applied Ne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.55 tonnes/ hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct applied N to maize significantly increased the grain yield (4.55 tonnes/ ha) and N uptake (131.80 kg/ha) in maize up to 120 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct maize nitrogen increased nitrogen uptake to 131.80 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Direct applied Ne0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
131.80 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct applied N to maize significantly increased the grain yield (4.55 tonnes/ ha) and N uptake (131.80 kg/ha) in maize up to 120 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield with 60 kg N/ha was 34.73% above no nitrogen.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
60 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.73 %e0
Comparator
no nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of maize with 60 kg N/ha increased by 34.73 % over no nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield with 120 kg N/ha was 13.78% above 60 kg N/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.78 %e0
Comparator
60 kg N/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding increase in yield with 120 kg N/ha over 60 kg N/ha was 13.78 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“succeeding maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers raised system nitrogen uptake and net returns versus none.

Taxon
wheat-maizee0
Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
N uptake and net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no biofertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“Both the biofertilizers, being on par, recorded higher N uptake and net returns over no biofertilizer in wheat-maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1452 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

System nitrogen uptake and net returns rose with residual and direct maize nitrogen through 120 kg N/ha.

Taxon
wheat-maizet0
Treatment
residual and direct applied N to maizee0
Outcome
uptake ofN and net returnse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake ofN and net returns in this cropping system increased with increasing levels of residual and direct applied N to maize up to 120 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–136 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.