Paper · 2000 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

THE EFFECT OF SOIL MOISTURE STRESS ON SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES

MONA M. SHEHATA; SOHAIR A. AZER; SHAFIKA N. MOSTAFA

16
claims
27
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two pot experiments were conducted during two successive sea-sons 1995/1996 and 1996/1997 to investigate the effect of different levels of soil available water (100%, 75% 50% and 25%) on four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.) The results indicated that: - Growth and yield of sugar beet shoot were affected by water deficit more than the corresponding roots. • In spite of increasing sucrose percentage in root juice, purity and sugar yield per plant were decreased under water strees. - Biosynthesis of chlorophyll A was more degraded by water stress than chlorophyll B or carotenoids. - Nitrogen and sodium concentrations in both root and leaves were more reduced than phosphorus and potassium with lowering soil moisture availability at 50% and 25% from control. - Proline concentration increased in sugar beet leaves while acid inver-tase activity was inhibited in plant's roots under drought condition. - Varieties of sugar beet significantly differed in their response to water stress; both Ras Poly and Del 939 varieties were less affected by water deficit. M 9340 variety was the most sensitive. Top variety was moder-ately affected. - The increase in free proline concentration under water stress was much higher in the leaves of tolerant sugar beet varieties than that in the sensitive ones. This proved that proline plays a role in drought toler-ance in sugar beet. - Varieties of sugar beet could be arranged ascendingly according to their root invertase activity. Ras poly, Del 939, Top and M 9340.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit affected sugar beet shoot growth and yield more than root growth and yield.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
Growth and yield of sugar beet shoote0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
corresponding rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield of sugar beet shoot were affected by water deficit more than the corresponding roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased sugar beet root juice sucrose percentage.

Treatment
water streese1
Outcome
sucrose percentage in root juicee1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spite of increasing sucrose percentage in root juice, purity and sugar yield per plant were decreased under water strees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced sugar beet root juice purity.

Treatment
water streese1
Outcome
puritye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“purity and sugar yield per plant were decreased under water strees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced sugar yield per sugar beet plant.

Treatment
water streese1
Outcome
sugar yield per plante1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“purity and sugar yield per plant were decreased under water strees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress degraded sugar beet chlorophyll A biosynthesis more than chlorophyll B or carotenoids.

Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
Biosynthesis of chlorophyll Ae1
Direction
more degradede1
Comparator
chlorophyll B or carotenoidse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biosynthesis of chlorophyll A was more degraded by water stress than chlorophyll B or carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% and 25% soil moisture availability, sugar beet nitrogen concentration in roots and leaves fell more than phosphorus and potassium concentrations.

Treatment
lowering soil moisture availability at 50% and 25%e1
Outcome
Nitrogen and sodium concentrations in both root and leavese1
Direction
more reducede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen and sodium concentrations in both root and leaves were more reduced than phosphorus and potassium with lowering soil moisture availability at 50% and 25% from control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline concentration in sugar beet leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
drought conditione0
Outcome
Proline concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline concentration increased in sugar beet leaves while acid inver-tase activity was inhibited in plant's roots under drought condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought inhibited acid invertase activity in sugar beet roots.

Organ / stage
plant's rootse1
Treatment
drought conditione1
Outcome
acid inver-tase activitye1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“acid inver-tase activity was inhibited in plant's roots under drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet varieties differed significantly in response to water stress.

Material
Varietiese0
Outcome
response to water stresse0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varieties of sugar beet significantly differed in their response to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ras Poly was less affected by water deficit.

Material
Ras Polye1
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
affectede1
Direction
lesse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“both Ras Poly and Del 939 varieties were less affected by water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Del 939 was less affected by water deficit.

Material
Del 939e1
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
affectede1
Direction
lesse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“both Ras Poly and Del 939 varieties were less affected by water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1069 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M 9340 was the most water stress sensitive sugar beet variety.

Material
M 9340e1
Outcome
most sensitivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“M 9340 variety was the most sensitive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top was moderately affected by water stress.

Material
Tope1
Outcome
moder-ately affectede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Top variety was moder-ately affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased leaf free proline more in tolerant sugar beet varieties than sensitive varieties.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
free proline concentratione1
Direction
much highere1
Comparator
sensitive onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in free proline concentration under water stress was much higher in the leaves of tolerant sugar beet varieties than that in the sensitive ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1307 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted proline as having a role in sugar beet drought tolerance.

Compound
prolinee0
Outcome
drought toler-ancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline plays a role in drought toler-ance in sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ras poly, Del 939, Top and M 9340 were ordered by ascending root invertase activity.

Outcome
root invertase activitye0
Direction
ascendinglye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varieties of sugar beet could be arranged ascendingly according to their root invertase activity. Ras poly, Del 939, Top and M 9340.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1517 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

soil water · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.