Paper · 2009 · OENO One

Combined effects of soil-applied and foliar-applied nitrogen on the nitrogen composition and distribution in water stressed "Vitis vinifera L." cv Sauvignon blanc grapes

Rana Jreij; Mary T. Kelly; Alain Deloire; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this work is to test the effects of soil-applied nitrogen (N) at budbreak and subsequent foliar-applied N at veraison on the N composition and partitioning in berries of water stressed Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc vines. Methods and results: N fertilizer was applied to the soil at budbreak at doses of 30 or 60 kg N/ha, while the control did not receive any treatment. This did not increase N content of leaves and the vines showed symptoms of N deficiency from the beginning of the season. In order to overcome this deficiency, N foliar sprayings were applied at veraison at doses of 2.5 or 5 kg N/ha to vines having received 30 or 60 kg N/ha of soil-applied N, respectively. Total N of berry flesh responded to N foliar fertilization more than that any other berry part, whereas amino acids in skins were the more affected by N foliar fertilization than those of other berry parts. Only the 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment produced a measurable increase in the total, assimilable and amino N in berry juices at maturity. Assimilable N was a better indicator for N summer uptake by the vine than total N. Of all amino acids, arginine showed the highest increases following N fertilization and could be considered among the better indicators to distinguish between N summer fertilization treatments. Conclusion: In conditions of severe water deficit and N deficiency, fertilization at a dose of 60 kg/ha soil-applied N combined with 5 kg/ha foliar-applied N improved fruit fermentability. Results support the use of foliar fertilization at veraison as a tool for enhancing grape quality and to a certain extent the style of wine. Significance and impact of study: This work helps to provide insight into the effect of N soil fertilization along with foliar fertilization on waterstressed vines. This may be useful in fertilization programs in the Mediterranean area and may help to choose the type and the rate of the N fertilization in case of severe vine water deficit. Also, we provide information of utmost importance on the distribution of summer foliarapplied N in grape tissues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vines showed nitrogen deficiency symptoms from the start of the season.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
symptoms of N deficiencye0
Qualifier
from the beginning of the seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the vines showed symptoms of N deficiency from the beginning of the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen increased total nitrogen in berry flesh more than in other berry parts.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
N foliar fertilizatione0
Outcome
Total N of berry fleshe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
any other berry parte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N of berry flesh responded to N foliar fertilization more than that any other berry part”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen affected skin amino acids more than amino acids in other berry parts.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
N foliar fertilizatione0
Outcome
amino acids in skinse0
Comparator
those of other berry partse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amino acids in skins were the more affected by N foliar fertilization than those of other berry parts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment measurably increased total nitrogen in mature berry juice.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
berry juices at maturitye0
Treatment
60 soil/5 foliar N treatmente0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only the 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment produced a measurable increase in the total, assimilable and amino N in berry juices at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment measurably increased assimilable nitrogen in mature berry juice.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
berry juices at maturitye0
Treatment
60 soil/5 foliar N treatmente0
Outcome
assimilablee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only the 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment produced a measurable increase in the total, assimilable and amino N in berry juices at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment measurably increased amino nitrogen in mature berry juice.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
berry juices at maturitye0
Treatment
60 soil/5 foliar N treatmente0
Outcome
amino Ne0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only the 60 soil/5 foliar N treatment produced a measurable increase in the total, assimilable and amino N in berry juices at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilable nitrogen was a better indicator of summer nitrogen uptake than total nitrogen.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
indicator for N summer uptakee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
total Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Assimilable N was a better indicator for N summer uptake by the vine than total N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine showed the largest increase among amino acids after nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
argininee0
Direction
highest increasese0
Comparator
all amino acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of all amino acids, arginine showed the highest increases following N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine could help distinguish summer nitrogen fertilization treatments.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
indicators to distinguish between N summer fertilization treatmentse0
Qualifier
could be considerede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arginine showed the highest increases following N fertilization and could be considered among the better indicators to distinguish between N summer fertilization treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar nitrogen improved fruit fermentability during severe water and nitrogen deficiency.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
60 kg/ha soil-applied N combined with 5 kg/ha foliar-applied Ne0
Outcome
fruit fermentabilitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
severe water deficit and N deficiencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In conditions of severe water deficit and N deficiency, fertilization at a dose of 60 kg/ha soil-applied N combined with 5 kg/ha foliar-applied N improved fruit fermentability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support foliar nitrogen at veraison to improve grape quality and wine style to some extent.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
use of foliar fertilization at veraisone0
Qualifier
to a certain extente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results support the use of foliar fertilization at veraison as a tool for enhancing grape quality and to a certain extent the style of wine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–142 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.