Paper · 2013 · Ecological Entomology

The effects of drought and herbivory on plant–herbivore interactions across 16 soybean genotypes in a field experiment

ROSE GRINNAN; THOMAS E. CARTER; MARC T. J. JOHNSON

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract As the Earth's climate continues to change, drought and insect population outbreaks are predicted to increase in many parts of the world. It is therefore important to understand how changes in such abiotic and biotic stressors might impact agroecosystems. The plant stress hypothesis predicts that, owing to physiological and biochemical changes, plants experiencing drought will be more susceptible to insect herbivory, which could have synergistic negative effects on plant performance. By contrast, the plant vigor hypothesis predicts that insects will preferentially feed on fast‐growing vigorous plants. These hypotheses were tested in a field experiment using 16 soybean ( Glycine max ( L .) M err.) genotypes to determine: (i) the combined effects of drought and herbivory on plant performance; (ii) the impact of drought on soybean resistance to herbivores; and (iii) how genetically variable phenotypic traits in soybean correlate with these responses. It was found that drought had a greater effect on soybean performance than herbivory, and drought and herbivory did not interact to impact on any measure of plant performance. Drought caused decreased insect herbivory on average, suggesting that the plant vigor hypothesis is consistent with the effects of drought stress on soybean resistance to leaf‐chewing insect herbivores. This conclusion is further supported by genotypic correlations which show that plant growth rate is positively correlated with the amount of herbivory plants received. These results suggest that, although the effects of climate‐associated changes in drought and herbivory will have negative effects on soybean, these potential effects are quantifiable with simple experiments and can be mitigated through continued breeding of varieties that are tolerant and resistant to these abiotic and biotic stressors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought affected soybean performance more than herbivory.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
soybean performancee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
herbivorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that drought had a greater effect on soybean performance than herbivory, and drought and herbivory did not interact to impact on any measure of plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1146 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and herbivory showed no interaction in their effects on soybean performance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
drought and herbivorye0
Outcome
plant performancee0
Direction
did not interacte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that drought had a greater effect on soybean performance than herbivory, and drought and herbivory did not interact to impact on any measure of plant performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased insect herbivory on soybean on average.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Droughte0
Interactor
leaf‐chewing insect herbivorese0herbivore
Outcome
insect herbivorye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused decreased insect herbivory on average, suggesting that the plant vigor hypothesis is consistent with the effects of drought stress on soybean resistance to leaf‐chewing insect herbivores.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean growth rate was positively correlated with herbivory received.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
plant growth ratee0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
amount of herbivory plants receivede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This conclusion is further supported by genotypic correlations which show that plant growth rate is positively correlated with the amount of herbivory plants received.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑

drought · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.