Paper · 1990 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Mineral nutrition of chickpea plants supplied with NO 3 or NH 4 N

G. A. Alloush; J. Le Bot; F. E. Sanders; et al.

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chickpea plants (Cicer arietinum L cv. ILC 195) were grown for 24 days in water culture under two regimes of nitrogen nutrition (NO3 or NH4‐N) with or without Fe. For plants fed with NO3‐N, Fe stress severely depressed fresh weight accumulation and chlorotic symptoms of Fe‐deficiency developed rapidly. Little difference in growth occurred in the NH4‐fed plants, whether or not Fe was withheld, with no visual evidence of Fe‐deficiency indicating a beneficial effect of NH4 in depressing the symptoms of Fe chlorosis. Typical pH changes were measured in the nutrient solution of the control plants in relation to nitrogen supply, increasing with NO3 and decreasing with NH4‐nutrition. With both forms of nitrogen, plants acidified the nutrient solution in response to Fe‐stress. Under NH4‐nutrition, acidification was enhanced by withholding Fe. In the NO3‐fed plants the uptake of all nutrients was reduced by the stress but proportionally NO3‐ and K+ were most affected. Total anion uptake was depressed more than that of cation uptake. For the NH4‐fed plants withholding Fe resulted in an increased uptake of all ions except NH4 + which was depressed. Regardless of the form of N‐supply, when Fe was withheld from the nutrient solution the net H+ efflux calculated from the (C‐A) uptake values was closely balanced by the OH” added to the nutrient solution to compensate for the pH changes. Evidence of accumulation of organic acids in the Fe‐stressed plants was found, especially in the NO3‐fed plants, indicating a role for these internally produced anion charges in balancing cation charge in relation to the depression of NO3 ‐ uptake associated with Fe‐stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe stress severely depressed fresh weight accumulation in nitrate-fed chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
Fe stresse0
Outcome
fresh weight accumulatione0
Direction
depressede0
Comparator
NO3‐Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“For plants fed with NO3‐N, Fe stress severely depressed fresh weight accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-fed chickpea rapidly developed Fe-deficiency chlorosis under Fe stress.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
Fe stresse0
Outcome
chlorotic symptoms of Fe‐deficiencye0
Qualifier
rapidlye0

Verbatim

e0

“For plants fed with NO3‐N, Fe stress severely depressed fresh weight accumulation and chlorotic symptoms of Fe‐deficiency developed rapidly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–312 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium-fed chickpea growth changed little when Fe was withheld.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Fe was withhelde0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
Little differencee0
Comparator
whether or not Fe was withhelde0

Verbatim

e0

“Little difference in growth occurred in the NH4‐fed plants, whether or not Fe was withheld”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–403 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium-fed chickpea had no visible Fe-deficiency symptoms under Fe withholding.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
no visual evidence of Fe‐deficiencye0

Verbatim

e0

“with no visual evidence of Fe‐deficiency indicating a beneficial effect of NH4 in depressing the symptoms of Fe chlorosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate nutrition increased nutrient-solution pH in control chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
NO3e0
Outcome
pH changese0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Typical pH changes were measured in the nutrient solution of the control plants in relation to nitrogen supply, increasing with NO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition decreased nutrient-solution pH in control chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
NH4‐nutritione0
Outcome
pH changese0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Typical pH changes were measured in the nutrient solution of the control plants in relation to nitrogen supply, increasing with NO3 and decreasing with NH4‐nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under both nitrogen forms, Fe-stressed chickpea acidified the nutrient solution.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
Fe‐stresse0
Outcome
acidified the nutrient solutione0

Verbatim

e0

“With both forms of nitrogen, plants acidified the nutrient solution in response to Fe‐stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding Fe enhanced acidification under ammonium nutrition.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
withholding Fee0
Outcome
acidificatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
NH4‐nutritione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under NH4‐nutrition, acidification was enhanced by withholding Fe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe stress reduced uptake of all nutrients in nitrate-fed chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
the stresse0
Outcome
uptake of all nutrientse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
NO3‐fed plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“In the NO3‐fed plants the uptake of all nutrients was reduced by the stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate and potassium uptake were proportionally most affected by Fe stress in nitrate-fed chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
the stresse0
Outcome
NO3‐ and K+ were most affectede0

Verbatim

e0

“In the NO3‐fed plants the uptake of all nutrients was reduced by the stress but proportionally NO3‐ and K+ were most affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe stress depressed total anion uptake more than cation uptake.

Outcome
Total anion uptakee0
Direction
depressed moree0
Comparator
cation uptakee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“Total anion uptake was depressed more than that of cation uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding Fe increased uptake of all ions except ammonium in ammonium-fed chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
withholding Fee0
Outcome
uptake of all ions except NH4 +e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NH4‐fed plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“For the NH4‐fed plants withholding Fe resulted in an increased uptake of all ions except NH4 + which was depressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding Fe depressed ammonium uptake in ammonium-fed chickpea.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
withholding Fee0
Outcome
NH4 +e0
Direction
depressede0
Comparator
NH4‐fed plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“For the NH4‐fed plants withholding Fe resulted in an increased uptake of all ions except NH4 + which was depressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Fe withholding, calculated net H+ efflux closely balanced OH” added to counter pH change.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
Fe was withhelde0
Outcome
net H+ effluxe0
Comparator
OH” added to the nutrient solutione0

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the form of N‐supply, when Fe was withheld from the nutrient solution the net H+ efflux calculated from the (C‐A) uptake values was closely balanced by the OH” added to the nutrient solution to compensate for the pH changes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acids accumulated in Fe-stressed chickpea, especially under nitrate nutrition.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
Fe‐stressede0
Outcome
accumulation of organic acidse0
Qualifier
especially in the NO3‐fed plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Evidence of accumulation of organic acids in the Fe‐stressed plants was found, especially in the NO3‐fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest internally produced organic acid anions help balance cation charge as nitrate uptake falls under Fe stress.

Outcome
balancing cation chargee0
Qualifier
internally produced anion chargese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“indicating a role for these internally produced anion charges in balancing cation charge in relation to the depression of NO3 ‐ uptake associated with Fe‐stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1678 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Combined Fe and Mn omission gave better growth than Mn omission with Fe.

    Some problems in the study of simultaneous multiple nutrient deficiencies in plants · 1980 · compared with no Mn with Fe

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.