Paper · 2012 · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

Effect of bacteria inoculants on corn silage quality

Asem Mohammed Zakaria; H. Yaakub; O. Radziah; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage. There are five lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from corn silage; Lactobacillus buchneri, L. hilgardii, L. kefiri, L. oris and L. rhamnosus which were applied at ~107-108 cfu/g of fresh corn forage. The inoculated chopped corn forage was stored in approximately 12 kg-capacity polyester containers for 14, 21 and 28 days. The temperature, pH, nutrient composition and aerobic stability was determined. Inoculation LAB improved the fermentation characteristics, increased nutrient digestibility and improved aerobic stability of corn silages. The bacterial inoculants did not significantly (P>0.05) decreased pH values of the corn silages. Addition of bacterial inoculants to corn silages increased its crude protein content significantly (P<0.05) with time. However, adding bacterial inoculants also significantly (P<0.05) decreased the neutral detergent fiber content with time. After 21 days, the process of fermentation appeared to be complete for all treatments. Among the five lactic acid bacteria used, L. buchneri was identified as the best inoculants for ensiling of corn forage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactic acid bacteria inoculation improved the fermentation characteristics of corn silage.

Treatment
Inoculation LABe1
Interactor
LABe1symbiont
Outcome
fermentation characteristicse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation LAB improved the fermentation characteristics, increased nutrient digestibility and improved aerobic stability of corn silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactic acid bacteria inoculation increased nutrient digestibility of corn silage.

Treatment
Inoculation LABe1
Interactor
LABe1symbiont
Outcome
nutrient digestibilitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation LAB improved the fermentation characteristics, increased nutrient digestibility and improved aerobic stability of corn silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactic acid bacteria inoculation improved aerobic stability of corn silage.

Treatment
Inoculation LABe1
Interactor
LABe1symbiont
Outcome
aerobic stabilitye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation LAB improved the fermentation characteristics, increased nutrient digestibility and improved aerobic stability of corn silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of bacterial inoculants increased crude protein content of corn silage with time.

Treatment
Addition of bacterial inoculantse2
Outcome
crude protein contente2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
with timee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“Addition of bacterial inoculants to corn silages increased its crude protein content significantly (P<0.05) with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculants decreased neutral detergent fiber content of corn silage with time.

Treatment
adding bacterial inoculantse3
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber contente3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
with timee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“adding bacterial inoculants also significantly (P<0.05) decreased the neutral detergent fiber content with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculants did not significantly change the pH values of corn silage (decreased only without significance).

Treatment
bacterial inoculantse4
Outcome
pH valuese4
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
did not significantly (P>0.05)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“The bacterial inoculants did not significantly (P>0.05) decreased pH values of the corn silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation of corn silage appeared complete after 21 days for all treatments.

Outcome
process of fermentatione5
Qualifier
After 21 dayse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation rate and quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“After 21 days, the process of fermentation appeared to be complete for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1097 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri is the best of five lactic acid bacteria inoculants for ensiling corn forage.

Taxon
corn foragee6
Material
L. buchnerie6
Interactor
lactic acid bacteriae6symbiont
Outcome
best inoculants for ensilinge6
Comparator
five lactic acid bacteriae6

Verbatim

e6

“Among the five lactic acid bacteria used, L. buchneri was identified as the best inoculants for ensiling of corn forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1218 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

32 papers: 21 positive, 11 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.