Paper · 2014 · ScienceRise

Diagnosis of drought resistance of wheat varieties of different breeding on osmoregulatory properties of seeds

Владимир Алексеевич Варавкин; Наталия Юрьевна Таран

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seeds of Krasnodarsakaia 99, Epokha Odessa winter wheat varieties under high osmotic pressure retain significant ability to germinate. The rooting intensity, growth of embryonic roots and stems in length in seedlings decreased in all varieties with sucrose concentration increasing. Natalka variety is less exposed to the adverse effects of osmosis, which is shown in maintaining of high seed germination, oppression reducing, and growth of roots and stems of seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds of Krasnodarsakaia 99 and Epokha Odessa winter wheat retained germination ability under high osmotic pressure.

Material
Krasnodarsakaia 99, Epokha Odessae0
Treatment
high osmotic pressuree0
Outcome
ability to germinatee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds of Krasnodarsakaia 99, Epokha Odessa winter wheat varieties under high osmotic pressure retain significant ability to germinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting intensity and growth of embryonic roots and stems of wheat seedlings decreased in all varieties as sucrose concentration increased.

Material
all varietiese1
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
sucrose concentratione1
Outcome
rooting intensity, growth of embryonic roots and stems in lengthe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds of Krasnodarsakaia 99, Epokha Odessa winter wheat varieties under high osmotic pressure retain significant ability to germinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rooting intensity, growth of embryonic roots and stems in length in seedlings decreased in all varieties with sucrose concentration increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natalka wheat was less exposed to adverse effects of osmosis, shown by maintained seed germination and reduced oppression with root and stem growth in seedlings.

Material
Natalkae2
Treatment
osmosise2
Outcome
adverse effectse2
Direction
less exposede2
Qualifier
maintaining of high seed germination, oppression reducing, and growth of roots and stems of seedlingse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds of Krasnodarsakaia 99, Epokha Odessa winter wheat varieties under high osmotic pressure retain significant ability to germinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e2

“Natalka variety is less exposed to the adverse effects of osmosis, which is shown in maintaining of high seed germination, oppression reducing, and growth of roots and stems of seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–469 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.