Paper · 1996 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Root Growth Inhibition in Boron-Deficient or Aluminum-Stressed Squash May Be a Result of Impaired Ascorbate Metabolism

K. M. Lukaszewski; D. G. Blevins

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
150
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Although cessation of growth is the most apparent symptom of boron deficiency, the biochemical function of boron in growth processes is not well understood. We propose that the action of boron in root meristems is associated with ascorbate metabolism. Total inhibition of root growth in squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) plants transferred to boron-free medium coincided with a major decrease (up to 98%) in the ascorbate concentration of root apices. Under low-boron conditions, in which root growth was partially inhibited, ascorbate concentration declined in proportion to growth rate. The decline in ascorbate concentration in boron-deficient root tips was not related to ascorbate oxidation. Ascorbate added to the medium improved root growth in plants supplied with insufficient boron. Increasing concentrations of aluminum in the nutrient medium caused progressive inhibition of root growth and a parallel reduction in ascorbate concentration of root apices. Elevated boron levels improved root growth under toxic aluminum conditions and produced root apices with higher ascorbate concentrations. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a correlation between boron nutrition, ascorbate concentration in root apices, and growth. These findings show that root growth inhibition resulting from either boron deficiency or aluminum toxicity may be a consequence of disrupted ascorbate metabolism.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron-free medium totally inhibited squash root growth.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
boron-free mediume0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total inhibition of root growth in squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) plants transferred to boron-free medium coincided with a major decrease (up to 98%) in the ascorbate concentration of root apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Squash root-apex ascorbate concentration decreased by up to 98% after transfer to boron-free medium.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
boron-free mediume0
Outcome
ascorbate concentration of root apicese0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
up to 98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total inhibition of root growth in squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) plants transferred to boron-free medium coincided with a major decrease (up to 98%) in the ascorbate concentration of root apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low boron, squash root growth was partially inhibited.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
low-boron conditionse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
partially inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under low-boron conditions, in which root growth was partially inhibited, ascorbate concentration declined in proportion to growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low boron, squash ascorbate concentration declined in proportion to growth rate.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
low-boron conditionse0
Outcome
ascorbate concentratione0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
in proportion to growth ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“Under low-boron conditions, in which root growth was partially inhibited, ascorbate concentration declined in proportion to growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Declining ascorbate concentration in boron-deficient squash root tips was not related to ascorbate oxidation.

Taxon
Squasht0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
ascorbate concentratione0
Qualifier
not related to ascorbate oxidatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The decline in ascorbate concentration in boron-deficient root tips was not related to ascorbate oxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added ascorbate improved root growth in squash with insufficient boron.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Ascorbate added to the mediume0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
insufficient borone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbate added to the medium improved root growth in plants supplied with insufficient boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aluminum progressively inhibited squash root growth.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Increasing concentrations of aluminume0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing concentrations of aluminum in the nutrient medium caused progressive inhibition of root growth and a parallel reduction in ascorbate concentration of root apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aluminum reduced ascorbate concentration in squash root apices.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Increasing concentrations of aluminume0
Outcome
ascorbate concentration of root apicese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing concentrations of aluminum in the nutrient medium caused progressive inhibition of root growth and a parallel reduction in ascorbate concentration of root apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated boron improved squash root growth under toxic aluminum.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Elevated boron levelse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
toxic aluminum conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated boron levels improved root growth under toxic aluminum conditions and produced root apices with higher ascorbate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated boron increased squash root-apex ascorbate concentration under toxic aluminum.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
Elevated boron levelse0
Outcome
ascorbate concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
toxic aluminum conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated boron levels improved root growth under toxic aluminum conditions and produced root apices with higher ascorbate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Disrupted ascorbate metabolism may explain squash root-growth inhibition under boron deficiency.

Taxon
Squasht0
Outcome
root growth inhibitione0
Qualifier
disrupted ascorbate metabolisme0

Verbatim

e0

“root growth inhibition resulting from either boron deficiency or aluminum toxicity may be a consequence of disrupted ascorbate metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Disrupted ascorbate metabolism may explain squash root-growth inhibition under aluminum toxicity.

Taxon
Squasht0
Outcome
root growth inhibitione0
Qualifier
disrupted ascorbate metabolisme0

Verbatim

e0

“root growth inhibition resulting from either boron deficiency or aluminum toxicity may be a consequence of disrupted ascorbate metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

aluminium atom · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

boron atom · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.