Paper · 1999 · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)

Finite element modeling of stored grain ecosystems and alternative pest control techniques

Michael D. Montross

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
8
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An axisymmetric finite element model was developed that takes into account the heat, mass, and momentum transfer that occurs in upright corrugated steel storage structures due to conduction, diffusion, and natural convection. Periods of aeration, dry matter loss distribution, and maize weevil density in corn were estimated. Heat and mass balances were used to calculate the temperature and relative humidity in the headspace and plenum assuming permeable grain surfaces. Two seasons of pilot bin experiments validated the model. The average standard error between the experimental and predicted temperatures was 2.4°C (1.8 to 3.1°C range) and the moisture content was 1.0 percentage point. Non-aerated, automatic ambient aeration, and automatic chilled aeration were evaluated in the replicated pilot bins as alternative methods to control insect development during summer storage. Ambient and chilled aeration reduced development of red flour beetles and maize weevils by 34% and 70% over non-aerated storage, respectively. Two locations were investigated (Indianapolis, IN and Minneapolis, MN) to demonstrate the application of the model to control insects in conventionally sized steel bins that were cooled during the fall and winter. The non-aerated and ambient aerated strategies behaved similarly until late summer when the maize weevil density increased dramatically in the non-aerated bins. Chilled aeration controlled maize weevil density at its initial population, but at an energy consumption of fourteen to sixteen times greater than ambient aeration. The simulation results indicated that automatic aeration increased the average bin temperature relative to non-aerated storage, which negated most of the benefits observed in the pilot bins. An optimal scenario includes ambient aeration during the fall, winter, and early spring with non-aerated storage during the summer. Moisture “migration” in the traditional sense did not occur in a cooled grain mass stored into the summer. Instead a more realistic theory of moisture exchange between the grain mass and headspace and plenum was developed. Permeability had a major influence on the magnitude of moisture accumulation. Moisture accumulation occurred primarily due to natural convection currents that entered and exited the headspace, which can be minimized by proper ventilation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted temperatures with 2.4°C average standard error.

Outcome
average standard error between the experimental and predicted temperaturese0
Value
2.4°Ce0
Qualifier
1.8 to 3.1°C rangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average standard error between the experimental and predicted temperatures was 2.4°C (1.8 to 3.1°C range)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted moisture content with 1.0 percentage point error.

Outcome
moisture contente0
Value
1.0 percentage pointe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the moisture content was 1.0 percentage point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient aeration reduced red flour beetle development by 34% relative to non-aerated storage.

Treatment
Ambiente0
Interactor
red flour beetlesTribolium castaneume0pest
Outcome
development of red flour beetlese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
non-aerated storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tribolium castaneum
Tribolium castaneum · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ambient and chilled aeration reduced development of red flour beetles and maize weevils by 34% and 70% over non-aerated storage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilled aeration reduced maize weevil development by 70% relative to non-aerated storage.

Treatment
chilled aeratione0
Interactor
maize weevilsSitophilus zeamaise0pest
Outcome
development of red flour beetles and maize weevilse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
non-aerated storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ambient and chilled aeration reduced development of red flour beetles and maize weevils by 34% and 70% over non-aerated storage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maize weevil density rose sharply in non-aerated bins in late summer.

Interactor
maize weevilSitophilus zeamaise0pest
Outcome
maize weevil densitye0
Direction
increased dramaticallye0
Qualifier
non-aerated binse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late summer when the maize weevil density increased dramatically in the non-aerated bins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Chilled aeration held maize weevil density at its initial population.

Treatment
Chilled aeratione0
Interactor
maize weevilSitophilus zeamaise0pest
Outcome
maize weevil densitye0
Direction
controllede0
Comparator
initial populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chilled aeration controlled maize weevil density at its initial population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Chilled aeration used fourteen to sixteen times more energy than ambient aeration.

Treatment
Chilled aeratione2
Outcome
energy consumptione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
fourteen to sixteen timese0
Comparator
ambient aeratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“energy consumption of fourteen to sixteen times greater than ambient aeration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chilled aeration controlled maize weevil density at its initial population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulation indicated automatic aeration increased average bin temperature versus non-aerated storage.

Treatment
automatic aeratione0
Outcome
average bin temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-aerated storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“automatic aeration increased the average bin temperature relative to non-aerated storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1693 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend ambient aeration in cooler seasons and non-aerated summer storage.

Outcome
ambient aeration during the fall, winter, and early spring with non-aerated storage during the summere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An optimal scenario includes ambient aeration during the fall, winter, and early spring with non-aerated storage during the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1888 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional moisture migration did not occur in a cooled grain mass stored into summer.

Outcome
Moisture “migration” in the traditional sensee0
Direction
did not occure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture “migration” in the traditional sense did not occur in a cooled grain mass stored into the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–1995 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Permeability strongly influenced the amount of moisture accumulation.

Treatment
Permeabilitye0
Outcome
magnitude of moisture accumulatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Permeability had a major influence on the magnitude of moisture accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2189 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Natural convection currents entering and leaving the headspace were the primary cause of moisture accumulation.

Outcome
Moisture accumulatione0
Qualifier
natural convection currents that entered and exited the headspacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture accumulation occurred primarily due to natural convection currents that entered and exited the headspace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2191–2304 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize weevil density in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–309 · show in text ↑