Paper · 2015 · Agriculture

Temperature Impact on the Forage Quality of Two Wheat Cultivars with Contrasting Capacity to Accumulate Sugars

Máximo Lorenzo; Silvia Assuero; Jorge Tognetti

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat is increasingly used as a dual-purpose crop (for forage and grain production) worldwide. Plants encounter low temperatures in winter, which commonly results in sugar accumulation. High sugar levels might have a positive impact on forage digestibility, but may also lead to an increased risk of bloat. We hypothesized that cultivars with a lower capacity to accumulate sugars when grown under cold conditions may have a lower bloat risk than higher sugar-accumulating genotypes, without showing significantly lower forage digestibility. This possibility was studied using two wheat cultivars with contrasting sugar accumulation at low temperature. A series of experiments with contrasting temperatures were performed in controlled-temperature field enclosures (three experiments) and growth chambers (two experiments). Plants were grown at either cool (8.1 °C–9.3 °C) or warm (15.7 °C–16.5 °C) conditions in field enclosures, and at either 5 °C or 25 °C in growth chambers. An additional treatment consisted of transferring plants from cool to warm conditions in the field enclosures and from 5 °C to 25 °C in the growth chambers. The plants in the field enclosure experiments were exposed to higher irradiances (i.e., 30%–100%) than those in the growth chambers. Our results show that (i) low temperatures led to an increased hemicellulose content, in parallel with sugar accumulation; (ii) low temperatures produced negligible changes in in vitro dry matter digestibility while leading to a higher in vitro rumen gas production, especially in the higher sugar-accumulating cultivar; (iii) transferring plants from cool to warm conditions led to a sharp decrease in in vitro rumen gas production in both cultivars; and (iv) light intensity (in contrast to temperature) appeared to have a lower impact on forage quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature increased hemicellulose content in wheat forage.

Treatment
low temperaturese0
Outcome
hemicellulose contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperatures led to an increased hemicellulose content, in parallel with sugar accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature increased sugar accumulation in wheat forage.

Treatment
low temperaturese0
Outcome
sugar accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperatures led to an increased hemicellulose content, in parallel with sugar accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperatures produced negligible changes in in vitro dry matter digestibility.

Treatment
low temperaturese0
Outcome
in vitro dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
negligible changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperatures produced negligible changes in in vitro dry matter digestibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperatures increased in vitro rumen gas production, especially in the higher sugar accumulating cultivar.

Material
higher sugar-accumulating cultivare0
Treatment
low temperaturese0
Outcome
in vitro rumen gas productione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperatures produced negligible changes in in vitro dry matter digestibility while leading to a higher in vitro rumen gas production, especially in the higher sugar-accumulating cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transfer from cool to warm conditions sharply decreased in vitro rumen gas production in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
transferring plants from cool to warm conditionse0
Outcome
in vitro rumen gas productione0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
coole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transferring plants from cool to warm conditions led to a sharp decrease in in vitro rumen gas production in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity appeared to have a lower impact on forage quality than temperature.

Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
forage qualitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light intensity (in contrast to temperature) appeared to have a lower impact on forage quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑

cold · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 21 positive, 46 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

cold · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

cold · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 27 positive, 26 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.