Paper · 2013 · Annals of Applied Biology

Microscopic and biochemical aspects of sorghum resistance to anthracnose mediated by silicon

R.S. Resende; F.A. Rodrigues; R.J. Gomes; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The use of silicon (Si) in agriculture has attracted a great deal of interest from researchers because of the numerous benefits of this element to plants, especially when they are submitted to abiotic and/or biotic types of stress. The host's increased resistance to diseases, promoted by Si, is mainly associated with the deposition of this element in the tissues and the potentiation of defence mechanisms. However, the mechanisms involved in Si‐mediated host resistance need to be further investigated. Thus, this study aimed to microscopically and biochemically elucidate the resistance of sorghum to anthracnose. In the leaves of plants supplied with Si, in addition to a greater deposition of Si at the infection sites, the acervuli were smaller in number compared to the leaves of plants not supplied with Si. Additionally, the activities of the defence enzymes peroxidases and polyphenoloxidases and the concentration of anthocyanins were higher in the leaves of plants supplied with Si. It can be concluded that Si, in addition to participate in the physical barrier that slows or prevents Colletotrichum sublineolum penetration in sorghum leaves, also plays a role in the biochemical aspect of sorghum resistance to anthracnose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supplied leaves had greater silicon deposition at infection sites.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
supplied with Sie0
Outcome
deposition of Si at the infection sitese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plants not supplied with Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the leaves of plants supplied with Si, in addition to a greater deposition of Si at the infection sites, the acervuli were smaller in number compared to the leaves of plants not supplied with Si.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum to anthracnose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supplied sorghum leaves had fewer acervuli.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Treatment
supplied with Sie1
Interactor
Colletotrichum sublineolume3pathogen
Outcome
acervulie0
Direction
smaller in numbere0
Comparator
plants not supplied with Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the acervuli were smaller in number compared to the leaves of plants not supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–824 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the leaves of plants supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–667 · show in text ↑
e2

“sorghum to anthracnose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
e3

“Colletotrichum sublineolum penetration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supplied leaves had higher peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activities.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
supplied with Sie0
Outcome
activities of the defence enzymes peroxidases and polyphenoloxidasese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants not supplied with Sie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of the defence enzymes peroxidases and polyphenoloxidases and the concentration of anthocyanins were higher in the leaves of plants supplied with Si.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum to anthracnose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants not supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supplied leaves had higher anthocyanin concentration.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
supplied with Sie0
Outcome
concentration of anthocyaninse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants not supplied with Sie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of anthocyanins were higher in the leaves of plants supplied with Si.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum to anthracnose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants not supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–824 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon was interpreted as providing a physical barrier to pathogen penetration.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Sie0
Interactor
Colletotrichum sublineolume0pathogen
Outcome
Colletotrichum sublineolum penetratione0
Qualifier
physical barriere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si, in addition to participate in the physical barrier that slows or prevents Colletotrichum sublineolum penetration in sorghum leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1164 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon was interpreted as contributing to biochemical resistance to anthracnose.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Sie1
Outcome
sorghum resistance to anthracnosee0
Qualifier
biochemical aspecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“also plays a role in the biochemical aspect of sorghum resistance to anthracnose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si, in addition to participate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1060 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · quality: phytochemicals · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.