Paper · 1967 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Iron in citrus production

E. F. Wallihan; M. J. Garber

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Twenty-three navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production and quality. When the concentration of iron in spring-cycle leaves was below 30 ppm (based on weight of dry leaves) in September, the production of fruit was less than when iron concentration exceeded 30 ppm. As the iron content decreased below this value, fruit production declined progressively and reached essentially zero at 15 ppm of iron. Fruit quality at harvest was not seriously affected except for some loss in color and the fact that iron content of the juice was about proportional to that in the leaves. The decrease in yield was due to fewer fruits being matured. Actual fruit sizes were the same or slightly larger in iron-deficient trees. Twig dieback was observed as a symptom of the degree of iron deficit that caused loss of fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency reduced navel orange fruit production compared with leaf iron above 30 ppm

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
iron deficiencye0
Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
iron concentration exceeded 30 ppme1
Setting
outdoor solution culturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“the production of fruit was less than when iron concentration exceeded 30 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–365 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit production declined progressively as leaf iron fell below 30 ppm, reaching essentially zero at 15 ppm of iron

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Compound
irone2
Outcome
fruit productione2
Direction
declinede2
Value
essentially zeroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“As the iron content decreased below this value, fruit production declined progressively and reached essentially zero at 15 ppm of iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality at harvest was not seriously affected, apart from some loss of color

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Outcome
Fruit quality at harveste3
Qualifier
except for some loss in colore3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruit quality at harvest was not seriously affected except for some loss in color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–584 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron content of the juice was about proportional to iron content of the leaves

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Compound
iron contente3
Outcome
iron content of the juicee3
Direction
proportionale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“iron content of the juice was about proportional to that in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–673 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in yield was attributed to fewer fruits being matured

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Outcome
decrease in yielde4
Qualifier
fewer fruits being maturede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“The decrease in yield was due to fewer fruits being matured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit size was the same or slightly larger in iron-deficient trees

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
iron-deficiente5
Outcome
fruit sizese5
Direction
the same or slightly largere5
Setting
outdoor solution culturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“Actual fruit sizes were the same or slightly larger in iron-deficient trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twig dieback was observed as a symptom of iron deficit that caused loss of fruit yield

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Outcome
Twig diebacke6
Qualifier
symptom of the degree of iron deficite6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“Twig dieback was observed as a symptom of the degree of iron deficit that caused loss of fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–913 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.