Paper · 2009 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and Graftings on Early Fruiting of Apple Seedlings

Soon-Il Kwon; Mok-Jong Kim; Pong-Nyol Paek; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For accelerating the apple breeding program, shortening the juvenile phase of seedlings is very important. This study was carried out to develop early fruiting methods using plant growth regulators and graftings in apple seedlings. The effects of plant growth regulators and grafting on shortening of the juvenile phase in apple cross seedlings were evaluated. First blooming and blooming rates of apple seedlings were various on treatments. The treatment of apple seedling grafted onto established 'Fuji' trees was more accelerating flowering than the other treatments. 38% of scions grafted on established 'Fuji' apple tree was flowered in third year after grafting, and 100% of these treatment was flowered in the fourth year. The treatment of apple seedling grafted onto seedling or M.26 rootstock was not flowered in third year after grafting, 30.5% or 33.0% of these treatments was flowered in the fourth year, respectively. Among foliar spray in one year old scions grafted on seedling rootstocks with growth regulators, abscisic acid (1,000 mg.L) and daminozide (1,000 mg.L) treatments induced flowering 91.8%, 87.5% in the fourth year, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting apple seedlings onto established Fuji trees accelerated flowering more than other treatments.

Taxon
apple seedlingMalus domesticae0
Treatment
grafted onto established 'Fuji' treese0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
more acceleratinge0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of apple seedling grafted onto established 'Fuji' trees was more accelerating flowering than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

38% of scions grafted on established Fuji trees flowered in year three.

Treatment
grafted on established 'Fuji' apple treee0
Outcome
flowerede0
Value
38%e0
Qualifier
third year after graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“38% of scions grafted on established 'Fuji' apple tree was flowered in third year after grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% of scions grafted on established Fuji trees flowered in year four.

Treatment
grafted on established 'Fuji' apple treee1
Outcome
flowerede0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
fourth yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% of these treatment was flowered in the fourth year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“scions grafted on established 'Fuji' apple tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling-rootstock grafts did not flower in year three.

Taxon
apple seedlingMalus domesticae0
Treatment
grafted onto seedlinge0
Outcome
not flowerede0
Qualifier
third year after graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple seedling grafted onto seedling or M.26 rootstock was not flowered in third year after grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M.26-rootstock grafts did not flower in year three.

Taxon
apple seedlingMalus domesticae0
Treatment
M.26 rootstocke0
Outcome
not flowerede0
Qualifier
third year after graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple seedling grafted onto seedling or M.26 rootstock was not flowered in third year after grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling-rootstock grafts flowered at 30.5% in year four.

Taxon
apple seedlingMalus domesticae0
Treatment
grafted onto seedlinge0
Outcome
flowerede0
Value
30.5%e0
Qualifier
fourth yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple seedling grafted onto seedling or M.26 rootstock was not flowered in third year after grafting, 30.5% or 33.0% of these treatments was flowered in the fourth year, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–929 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M.26-rootstock grafts flowered at 33.0% in year four.

Taxon
apple seedlingMalus domesticae0
Treatment
M.26 rootstocke0
Outcome
flowerede0
Value
33.0%e0
Qualifier
fourth yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple seedling grafted onto seedling or M.26 rootstock was not flowered in third year after grafting, 30.5% or 33.0% of these treatments was flowered in the fourth year, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid spray induced 91.8% flowering in year four.

Treatment
abscisic acid (1,000 mg.L)e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
inducede0
Value
91.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“abscisic acid (1,000 mg.L) and daminozide (1,000 mg.L) treatments induced flowering 91.8%, 87.5% in the fourth year, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daminozide spray induced 87.5% flowering in year four.

Treatment
daminozide (1,000 mg.L)e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
inducede0
Value
87.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“abscisic acid (1,000 mg.L) and daminozide (1,000 mg.L) treatments induced flowering 91.8%, 87.5% in the fourth year, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–84 · show in text ↑

Daminozide · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

grafting · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.