Paper · 1987 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Growth and flower-bud formation in apple as affected by paclobutrazol, daminozide, and tree orientation in combination with various gibberellins

J. Tromp

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
19
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe effect of paclobutrazol (1000 ppm), daminozide (1800 ppm), and the gibberellins GA3, GA4, GA7 and GA4+7 (500 ppm), applied alone or in various combinations on shoot growth and flower-bud formation was determined for one-year-old (two experiments) or two-year-old (one experiment) cv Cox’s Orange Pippin trees in pots. One experiment included tree position (vertical v. horizontal). Daminozide, paclobutrazol (when applied twice) and the horizontal position reduced shoot growth, but the GAs had little or no effect. In the year after treatments, growth of the paclobutrazol-treated trees was stimulated considerably. In the other treatment groups there was no pronounced after-effect on growth. GA3 and GA4 had little or no influence on flowering, whereas GA7 and GA4+7 greatly reduced it. Paclobutrazol stimulated flowering where the general level of flowering in the experiment was low or reduced by some other treatment (e.g. with GA7). Flowering was promoted in horizontally-positioned trees and to some degree after spraying with daminozide. A positive correlation was found between the weight ratio of vegetative to floral parts in individual flower buds on spurs and total shoot growth as affected by the various treatments. The reduction of flowering by GA7 was greatest on the basal parts of the shoots, at least in the horizontal and the daminozide-treated trees. The promotion of flowering by paclobutrazol and the horizontal position mainly concerned the upper half of the shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daminozide reduced shoot growth.

Treatment
Daminozidee0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daminozide, paclobutrazol (when applied twice) and the horizontal position reduced shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol applied twice reduced shoot growth.

Treatment
paclobutrazole0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when applied twicee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daminozide, paclobutrazol (when applied twice) and the horizontal position reduced shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horizontal tree orientation reduced shoot growth.

Treatment
horizontal positione0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daminozide, paclobutrazol (when applied twice) and the horizontal position reduced shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellins had little or no effect on shoot growth.

Treatment
gibberellinse1
Outcome
shoot growthe1
Direction
little or no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the GAs had little or no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“and the gibberellins GA3, GA4, GA7 and GA4+7 (500 ppm), applied alone or in various combinations on shoot growth and flower-bud formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–207 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol-treated trees showed considerable growth stimulation in the following year.

Treatment
paclobutrazol-treatede0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
year after treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the year after treatments, growth of the paclobutrazol-treated trees was stimulated considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatment groups showed no pronounced subsequent growth effect.

Treatment
other treatment groupse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no pronounced after-effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the other treatment groups there was no pronounced after-effect on growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 had little or no influence on flowering.

Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
little or no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 and GA4 had little or no influence on flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4 had little or no influence on flowering.

Treatment
GA4e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
little or no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 and GA4 had little or no influence on flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA7 greatly reduced flowering.

Treatment
GA7e0
Outcome
floweringe1
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA7 and GA4+7 greatly reduced it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA3 and GA4 had little or no influence on flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+7 greatly reduced flowering.

Treatment
GA4+7e0
Outcome
floweringe1
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA7 and GA4+7 greatly reduced it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA3 and GA4 had little or no influence on flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol stimulated flowering when baseline flowering was low or reduced by another treatment.

Treatment
Paclobutrazole0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
where the general level of flowering in the experiment was low or reduced by some other treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paclobutrazol stimulated flowering where the general level of flowering in the experiment was low or reduced by some other treatment (e.g. with GA7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horizontal tree orientation promoted flowering.

Treatment
horizontally-positionede0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering was promoted in horizontally-positioned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daminozide spraying promoted flowering to some degree.

Treatment
spraying with daminozidee0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
to some degreee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering was promoted in horizontally-positioned trees and to some degree after spraying with daminozide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vegetative-to-floral part weight ratio in spur buds correlated positively with total shoot growth.

Organ / stage
flower buds on spurse0
Outcome
weight ratio of vegetative to floral partse0
Direction
positive correlatione0
Comparator
total shoot growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation was found between the weight ratio of vegetative to floral parts in individual flower buds on spurs and total shoot growth as affected by the various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA7 reduced flowering most strongly on basal shoot parts in horizontal and daminozide-treated trees.

Organ / stage
basal parts of the shootse0
Treatment
GA7e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
at least in the horizontal and the daminozide-treated treese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of flowering by GA7 was greatest on the basal parts of the shoots, at least in the horizontal and the daminozide-treated trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol promoted flowering mainly in upper shoot halves.

Organ / stage
upper half of the shootse0
Treatment
paclobutrazole0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The promotion of flowering by paclobutrazol and the horizontal position mainly concerned the upper half of the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horizontal orientation promoted flowering mainly in upper shoot halves.

Organ / stage
upper half of the shootse0
Treatment
horizontal positione0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The promotion of flowering by paclobutrazol and the horizontal position mainly concerned the upper half of the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑

Daminozide · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

paclobutrazol · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

class · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 38 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.