Paper · 2012 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Yield and Nitrogen Uptake by Sweet Corn

Harphool Meena; Sharma G L; Golada S L; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment were conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Banawara during zaid season, 2010 and 2011 on clay loam soil to find out the optimum levels of nitrogen, Azotobacter inoculation and nitrogen sources. The experiment comprising of thirty treatment combinations with three levels of nitrogen (75 % , 100% and 125% RDN), two Azotobacter ( seed inoculation and without inoculation) and five nitrogen sources (100% fertilizer-N, 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N,100% poultry manure , 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cake) were laid out in split plot design with four replications. Significant increase in yield, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in the soil were recorded under application of 125% RDN level over 75% RDN and 100% RDN levels.The Azotobacter inoculation recorded significantly higher yield of sweet corn, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in soil at crop harvest over no inoculation. In case of different nitrogen sources significant increase in green cob (7.93 t/ ha), green fodder (19.54 t/ha) and biological (27.47 t/ha) yields of sweet corn were recorded under application of 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N over rest of nitrogen sources but found at par with100% fertilizer-N. Application of 100% fertilizer-N and 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N were found at par in respect of nitrogen uptake by cobs, fodder and total uptake by crop but found superior over 100% poultry manure, 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cake, respectively. The maximum available nitrogen in the soil was recorded under application of 100% fertilizer-N over 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer- N,100% poultry manure, 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cake, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDN, yield increased significantly over lower rates.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
125% RDNe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
75% RDN and 100% RDNe0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in yield, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in the soil were recorded under application of 125% RDN level over 75% RDN and 100% RDN levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDN, nitrogen uptake increased significantly over lower rates.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
125% RDNe0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
75% RDN and 100% RDNe0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in yield, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in the soil were recorded under application of 125% RDN level over 75% RDN and 100% RDN levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDN, soil available nitrogen increased significantly over lower rates.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
125% RDNe0
Outcome
available nitrogen in the soile0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
75% RDN and 100% RDNe0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in yield, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in the soil were recorded under application of 125% RDN level over 75% RDN and 100% RDN levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Azotobacter inoculatione0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Azotobacter inoculation recorded significantly higher yield of sweet corn, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in soil at crop harvest over no inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Azotobacter inoculatione0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Azotobacter inoculation recorded significantly higher yield of sweet corn, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in soil at crop harvest over no inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation significantly increased soil available nitrogen.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Azotobacter inoculatione0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
available nitrogen in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Azotobacter inoculation recorded significantly higher yield of sweet corn, nitrogen uptake and available nitrogen in soil at crop harvest over no inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed poultry manure and fertilizer treatment produced 7.93 t/ha green cob yield, significantly above other sources except fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-Ne0
Outcome
green cobe0
Value
7.93 t/ hae0
Qualifier
at par with100% fertilizer-Ne0
Comparator
rest of nitrogen sourcese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“green cob (7.93 t/ ha), green fodder (19.54 t/ha) and biological (27.47 t/ha) yields of sweet corn were recorded under application of 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N over rest of nitrogen sources but found at par with100% fertilizer-N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed poultry manure and fertilizer treatment produced 19.54 t/ha green fodder yield, significantly above other sources except fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-Ne0
Outcome
green foddere0
Value
19.54 t/hae0
Qualifier
at par with100% fertilizer-Ne0
Comparator
rest of nitrogen sourcese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“green cob (7.93 t/ ha), green fodder (19.54 t/ha) and biological (27.47 t/ha) yields of sweet corn were recorded under application of 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N over rest of nitrogen sources but found at par with100% fertilizer-N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed poultry manure and fertilizer treatment produced 27.47 t/ha biological yield, significantly above other sources except fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-Ne0
Outcome
biologicale0
Value
27.47 t/hae0
Qualifier
at par with100% fertilizer-Ne0
Comparator
rest of nitrogen sourcese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“green cob (7.93 t/ ha), green fodder (19.54 t/ha) and biological (27.47 t/ha) yields of sweet corn were recorded under application of 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N over rest of nitrogen sources but found at par with100% fertilizer-N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer alone and the mixed poultry treatment were at par in cob, fodder and total nitrogen uptake, and superior to other listed sources.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
100% fertilizer-N and 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-Ne0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake by cobs, fodder and total uptake by crope0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
100% poultry manure, 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cakee0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% fertilizer-N and 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer-N were found at par in respect of nitrogen uptake by cobs, fodder and total uptake by crop but found superior over 100% poultry manure, 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer alone gave maximum soil available nitrogen relative to other nitrogen sources.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
100% fertilizer-Ne0
Outcome
available nitrogen in the soile0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer- N,100% poultry manure, 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cakee0

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum available nitrogen in the soil was recorded under application of 100% fertilizer-N over 50% poultry manure + 50% fertilizer- N,100% poultry manure, 50% jatropha cake + 50% fertilizer-N and 100% jatropha cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Azotobacter · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.