Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of banana pseudostem sap as liquid fertilizer in onion

J. R. Salunkhe; A. M. Patel; R. G. Patil; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An investigation was carried out at Soil and Water Management Research Unit Farm, N.A.U., Navsari during rabi season of 2008-09 to study the feasibility of using banana pseudostem sap as liquid fertilizer in onion under drip irrigation. Banana speudostem sap is rich in nutrients and having growth promoting substances, its judicious utilization in crop production enhances crop yield with very less input costs. Due to various treatments yield of onion bulbs produced from 80 % RDF along with sap @ 2000 l/ha under drip irrigation. In case of nutrient content and uptake, 100 % RDF with sap @ 2000 l/ha gave highest values which were followed by 80 % RDF + sap @ 1500 l/ha. These treatments produced higher nutrient availability in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb yield was produced with 80% RDF plus 2000 l/ha sap under drip irrigation.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
80 % RDF along with sap @ 2000 l/hae0
Outcome
yield of onion bulbse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of onion bulbs produced from 80 % RDF along with sap @ 2000 l/ha under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF with 2000 l/ha sap gave the highest nutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
100 % RDF with sap @ 2000 l/hae0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient content and uptake, 100 % RDF with sap @ 2000 l/ha gave highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80% RDF with 1500 l/ha sap followed in nutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
80 % RDF + sap @ 1500 l/hae0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptakee1
Direction
followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which were followed by 80 % RDF + sap @ 1500 l/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“nutrient content and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–571 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These treatments produced higher nutrient availability in soil.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
100 % RDF with sap @ 2000 l/hae1
Outcome
nutrient availability in soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments produced higher nutrient availability in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 % RDF with sap @ 2000 l/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 81 positive, 9 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.