Paper · 2004 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

SENSORY AND HEALTH-RELATED FRUIT QUALITY OF ORGANIC APPLES. A COMPARATIVE FIELD STUDY OVER THREE YEARS USING CONVENTIONAL AND HOLISTIC METHODS TO ASSESS FRUIT QUALITY

Franco Weibel; D. Treutter; Andi Häseli; et al.

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
18
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a 3 years lasting field study with the ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivar, we compared fruits of 5 pairs of organic/integrated fruit farms. The orchards were similar in microclimate, soil conditions and planting system. To assess inner fruit quality we investigated at the beginning and at the end of cold storage: (i) standard parameters (firmness, sugar, malic acid., mineral content); (ii) sensorial quality by panel tests; (iii) health related components (23 phenolic compounds, nutritional fibres; vitamins); and (v) fruit «vitality quality» by holistic approaches (crystallisation in copper chloride, self degradation tests, feeding preference tests with laboratory rats). The most significant differences were found in year one of the study, and were by tendency confirmed in the following two years. In year one all fruit samples of organic orchards had significantly firmer fruit flesh (14%), a 10 % higher index of inner quality (on basis of sugar and malic acid content and fruit flesh firmness), and 15% higher taste scores than conventional ones. Phosphorus content of the fruit flesh was 31% higher in organic apples and closely correlated (r2 = 0.93) with the index of inner quality and sensory score (r2 = 0.69). No extraction method of Phosphorus in the soil (water, NH4-EDTA, citric acid, CAL) correlated with the P-content in the fruits. However, P in the fruit flesh correlated by r2 = 0.72 with the microbial activity of the soil expressed as the ratio of microbialbound Nitrogen and Carbon in the soil. With a value of 3.85 the Cmic:Nmic ratio was 44.5 % lower (thus more favourable) in organic tree strips. Flavanols, with 65.7 % of the total polyphenol content were the dominant group of polyphenols. The content of flavonols was 22.7 % higher in organic apples in the first year and 15.6 % in the average of the three years. The self-degradation test didn't provide significant differences. Laboratory rats, showed a tendency to prefer IP apples probably due to their advanced ripeness. Thus rat behaviour did not correspond with the sensory panel judgement. The picture forming method provided a correct reproducibility with repeated blind samples before and after storage (r2 = 0.83), and distinguished 100 % correctly organic an IP fruit in the first year. In the second year there was one miss qualification. The average value over three dates of the index for «vitality quality», which was especially created for this study, was 44.6 % higher with organic apples The picture forming methods correlated well with sensory scores and standard quality (r2 = 0.63) in the first year. The study revealed interesting and consumer-relevant differences between organic and integrated apples with standard and holistic methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had 14% firmer flesh in year one.

Treatment
organic orchardse0
Outcome
fruit fleshe0
Direction
firmere0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
conventional onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all fruit samples of organic orchards had significantly firmer fruit flesh (14%), a 10 % higher index of inner quality (on basis of sugar and malic acid content and fruit flesh firmness), and 15% higher taste scores than conventional ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had a 10% higher inner quality index in year one.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
index of inner qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
10 %e0
Comparator
conventional onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all fruit samples of organic orchards had significantly firmer fruit flesh (14%), a 10 % higher index of inner quality (on basis of sugar and malic acid content and fruit flesh firmness), and 15% higher taste scores than conventional ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had 15% higher taste scores in year one.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
taste scorese0
Direction
highere0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
conventional onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all fruit samples of organic orchards had significantly firmer fruit flesh (14%), a 10 % higher index of inner quality (on basis of sugar and malic acid content and fruit flesh firmness), and 15% higher taste scores than conventional ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apple flesh had 31% higher phosphorus content.

Treatment
organic applese0
Outcome
Phosphorus content of the fruit fleshe0
Direction
highere0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus content of the fruit flesh was 31% higher in organic apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit phosphorus content correlated with inner quality index at r² 0.93.

Compound
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
index of inner qualitye0
Value
r2 = 0.93e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus content of the fruit flesh was 31% higher in organic apples and closely correlated (r2 = 0.93) with the index of inner quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit phosphorus content correlated with sensory score at r² 0.69.

Compound
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
sensory scoree0
Value
r2 = 0.69e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus content of the fruit flesh was 31% higher in organic apples and closely correlated (r2 = 0.93) with the index of inner quality and sensory score (r2 = 0.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No soil phosphorus extraction method correlated with fruit phosphorus content.

Treatment
extraction method of Phosphorus in the soile0
Outcome
P-content in the fruitse0
Direction
Noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No extraction method of Phosphorus in the soil (water, NH4-EDTA, citric acid, CAL) correlated with the P-content in the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit-flesh phosphorus correlated with soil microbial activity at r² 0.72.

Interactor
microbiale0other
Outcome
P in the fruit fleshe0
Value
r2 = 0.72e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P in the fruit flesh correlated by r2 = 0.72 with the microbial activity of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial carbon-to-nitrogen ratio was 44.5% lower in organic tree strips.

Outcome
Cmic:Nmic ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
44.5 %e0
Setting
organic tree stripse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“With a value of 3.85 the Cmic:Nmic ratio was 44.5 % lower (thus more favourable) in organic tree strips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1624 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavanols accounted for 65.7% of total polyphenols and were the dominant group.

Outcome
Flavanolse0
Direction
dominante0
Value
65.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavanols, with 65.7 % of the total polyphenol content were the dominant group of polyphenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had 22.7% more flavonols in year one.

Treatment
organic applese0
Outcome
content of flavonolse0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of flavonols was 22.7 % higher in organic apples in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples averaged 15.6% more flavonols across three years.

Treatment
organic applese0
Outcome
content of flavonolse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.6 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of flavonols was 22.7 % higher in organic apples in the first year and 15.6 % in the average of the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-degradation testing found no significant treatment differences.

Outcome
significant differencese0

Not reportedComparatorDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The self-degradation test didn't provide significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1910 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory rats tended to prefer integrated apples.

Interactor
Laboratory ratse0other
Outcome
tendency to prefer IP applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory rats, showed a tendency to prefer IP apples probably due to their advanced ripeness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2006 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The picture-forming method had repeated-blind-sample reproducibility r² 0.83.

Outcome
reproducibilitye0
Value
r2 = 0.83e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The picture forming method provided a correct reproducibility with repeated blind samples before and after storage (r2 = 0.83)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2080–2206 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The picture-forming method correctly distinguished all organic and integrated fruit in year one.

Outcome
organic an IP fruite0
Value
100 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“distinguished 100 % correctly organic an IP fruit in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2212–2279 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The picture-forming method misclassified one sample in year two.

Outcome
miss qualificatione0
Value
onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second year there was one miss qualification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2332 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic apples had a 44.6% higher vitality quality index averaged across three dates.

Treatment
organic applese0
Outcome
index for «vitality quality»e0
Direction
highere0
Value
44.6 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average value over three dates of the index for «vitality quality», which was especially created for this study, was 44.6 % higher with organic apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2334–2488 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picture-forming measures correlated with sensory scores and standard quality at r² 0.63 in year one.

Outcome
sensory scores and standard qualitye0
Value
r2 = 0.63e0
Qualifier
in the first yeare0
Comparator
picture forming methodse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The picture forming methods correlated well with sensory scores and standard quality (r2 = 0.63) in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2489–2603 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.