Paper · 2009 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

The effect of inoculation with AMF inoculum on growth and Verticillium wilt of cotton.

Bu Juan; Cui WeiDong; Min Lou; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The test studies on growth and verticillium wilt of cotton inoculated by AM fungi of Glomus mosseae and Glomus etunicatum,and discusses the possible mechanisms for induced disease resistance by AMF.The results indicate that the AMF inoculation can promote the growth of cotton plants and increase the content of chlorophyll in leaves.Under the condition of the combination of inoculation with AMF first and pathogen afterwards,the content of total phenol in cotton roots was increased,inducing the synthesis of POD enzyme in cotton roots was induced and POD activity was increased.The disease incidence and disease index of mycorrhizal cotton plants also decreased significantly.On the other hand,the mycorrhizal infection rate of cotton plants decreased when the plants exposed to pathogen fungi.It is proved that there are certain interactions between the two kinds of fungi,AMF and Verticillium dahliae.The establishment of arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiotic relationship between AMF and plant introduced influences on plant in many aspects,and the mechanism for the resistance of plant against pathogen induced by AMF is a complicated process involving many changes in plant tissue structure,physiology and biochemistry,such as improving plant nutritional status,competing photosynthesis products and colonization sites with pathogen,and activating plant defence reaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation promoted the growth of cotton plants.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
growth of cotton plantse1
Direction
promotee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results indicate that the AMF inoculation can promote the growth of cotton plants and increase the content of chlorophyll in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased the chlorophyll content in cotton leaves.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
content of chlorophyll in leavese1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results indicate that the AMF inoculation can promote the growth of cotton plants and increase the content of chlorophyll in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under AMF inoculation followed by pathogen, total phenol content in cotton roots increased.

Treatment
inoculation with AMF first and pathogen afterwardse2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
content of total phenol in cotton rootse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Under the condition of the combination of inoculation with AMF first and pathogen afterwards,the content of total phenol in cotton roots was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under AMF inoculation followed by pathogen, POD enzyme activity in cotton roots increased.

Treatment
inoculation with AMF first and pathogen afterwardse2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Gene
POD enzymee3
Outcome
POD activitye3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Under the condition of the combination of inoculation with AMF first and pathogen afterwards,the content of total phenol in cotton roots was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–484 · show in text ↑
e3

“inducing the synthesis of POD enzyme in cotton roots was induced and POD activity was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal cotton plants had significantly decreased disease incidence and disease index.

Treatment
mycorrhizale4
Outcome
disease incidence and disease indexe4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The disease incidence and disease index of mycorrhizal cotton plants also decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mycorrhizal infection rate of cotton plants decreased when the plants were exposed to pathogen fungi.

Treatment
exposed to pathogen fungie5
Interactor
AMFe6symbiont
Second interactor
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee6pathogen
Outcome
mycorrhizal infection ratee5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · Second interactorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the mycorrhizal infection rate of cotton plants decreased when the plants exposed to pathogen fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–796 · show in text ↑
e6

“there are certain interactions between the two kinds of fungi,AMF and Verticillium dahliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–905 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-induced resistance of plants against pathogen is a complicated process involving changes in tissue structure, physiology and biochemistry.

Taxon
plante7
Interactor
AMFe7symbiont
Outcome
resistance of plant against pathogene7
Qualifier
a complicated process involving many changes in plant tissue structure,physiology and biochemistrye7

Verbatim

e7

“the mechanism for the resistance of plant against pathogen induced by AMF is a complicated process involving many changes in plant tissue structure,physiology and biochemistry,such as improving plant nutritional status,competing photosynthesis products and colonization sites with pathogen,and activating plant defence reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1372 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 61 positive, 12 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.