Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Journal

Shoot Growth, Phosphorus–Nitrogen Relationships, and Yield of Canola in Response to Mineral Phosphorus Fertilization

Gilles Bélanger; Noura Ziadi; Denis Pageau; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop responses to increasing P fertilization are often variable and poorly related to soil P test. Our objectives were to determine the influence of P fertilizer on the growth and seed yield of canola ( Brassica napus L.) and to develop a first approximation of its critical phosphorus concentration (P c ) in shoot biomass. An experiment with four rates of P fertilizer (0, 20, 40, and 80 kg P ha −1 ) was conducted on soils with a low available P content at 5 site‐years [Normandin (QC; 2010, 2011, 2012) and Brandon (MB; 2010, 2012)] in Canada. Dry matter (DM) yield, and N and P concentrations were measured weekly on 5 d from early bolting to late flowering, and seed yield was measured at harvest. Seed yield was significantly increased by P fertilization at only 1 of the 5 site‐years, even though a positive response was expected at all site‐years. Phosphorus fertilization did not affect shoot growth and P uptake at any of the 5 site‐years. However, the estimated shoot biomass on the first sampling day was reduced with no P application at 3 of the 5 site‐years. A reduction in early crop growth of more than 30%, however, was required to affect seed yield. The whole‐plant canola P c was expressed as function of N concentration (P c = 1.74 + 0.024N, R 2 = 0.24, P = 0.05) but this first approximation requires further validation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization significantly increased canola seed yield at only 1 of the 5 site-years.

Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at only 1 of the 5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed yield was significantly increased by P fertilization at only 1 of the 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization did not affect canola shoot growth and P uptake at any of the 5 site-years.

Treatment
Phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
shoot growth and P uptakee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
at any of the 5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus fertilization did not affect shoot growth and P uptake at any of the 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated shoot biomass of canola on the first sampling day was reduced with no P application at 3 of the 5 site-years.

Treatment
no P applicatione0
Outcome
estimated shoot biomass on the first sampling daye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at 3 of the 5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“the estimated shoot biomass on the first sampling day was reduced with no P application at 3 of the 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A reduction in early canola growth of more than 30% was required to affect seed yield.

Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
more than 30%e0
Qualifier
reduction in early crop growth of more than 30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“A reduction in early crop growth of more than 30%, however, was required to affect seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1167 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The whole-plant canola critical P concentration (Pc) was expressed as a function of N concentration as Pc = 1.74 + 0.024N (R2 = 0.24, P = 0.05); this first approximation requires further validation.

Outcome
P ce0
Value
P c = 1.74 + 0.024Ne0
Qualifier
this first approximation requires further validatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“canola P c was expressed as function of N concentration (P c = 1.74 + 0.024N, R 2 = 0.24, P = 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“this first approximation requires further validation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1341 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.