Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

THE IMPACT OF FERTILIZATION AND FOLIAR STIMULATION PRODUCTS BOTH ON INCREASING THE RESISTANCE TO MAJOR PHYTOPATHOGENS ATTACKS, AND ON INCREASING THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF WINE GRAPES HARVEST

Cristina BUNESCU

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The paper aimed to demonstrate the impact of fertilization and foliar stimulation products both on increasing the resistance to major phytopathogens attacks, and on increasing the quantity and quality of wine grapes harvest. Applying the foliar fertilizer products Plonvit Kali (c1), Tytanit (c2) and Optysil (c3) to vines, for a period of three years (2011/2013), in phenophases of intensive growth of shoots and grapes at approved dosages, simultaneously with pesticide treatment, not only a reduction of pathogenic fungi attack was obtained, but also and an increase of harvest without diminishing the quality of the grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer products reduced attack by pathogenic fungi on wine grape vines.

Taxon
wine grapesVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar fertilizer productse1
Interactor
pathogenic fungie2pathogen
Outcome
pathogenic fungi attacke2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF WINE GRAPES HARVEST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–192 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying the foliar fertilizer products Plonvit Kali (c1), Tytanit (c2) and Optysil (c3) to vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“not only a reduction of pathogenic fungi attack was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer products increased grape harvest without diminishing grape quality.

Taxon
wine grapesVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar fertilizer productse1
Outcome
harveste3
Direction
increasee3
Qualifier
without diminishing the quality of the grapese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF WINE GRAPES HARVEST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–192 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying the foliar fertilizer products Plonvit Kali (c1), Tytanit (c2) and Optysil (c3) to vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“an increase of harvest without diminishing the quality of the grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–626 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · disease · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.