Paper · 2015 · Procedia Environmental Sciences

Investigation of the Stress Tolerance of Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions

K. Balla; I. Karsai; S. Bencze; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought around the world is one of the most important yield reducing factor. From the cross of winter wheat varieties (Plainsman V x Mv Magma) doubled haploid (DH) population was created consisting of 174 lines to investigate the drought tolerance of the genotypes exposed to two treatments; natural rain-fed and well-watered conditions in the field. The object of the experiment was to determine the yield production capacity of the DH lines under natural rain-fed conditions and to compare the effect of changes in the yield components due to irrigation. After ripening, the wheat plants were harvested from both treatments. The plant height, the length of last internode, number of spikelets, seed number, seed weight on the main stem; the number of reproductive tillers, seed number and weight per plant was determined. The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants. Averaged over the DH lines, the heading date was significantly affected by irrigation. Irrigation significantly increased all the morphological parameters. Not only the average, but also the minimum and maximum values increased significantly for spikelet number, reproductive tiller number and plant height. Changes in the morphological parameters resulted in significant alterations in the yield components. The irrigation significantly increased the total grain number per plant, the thousand kernel weight and the grain yield averaged over the DH lines. The results showed that the morphological parameters and yield components can still be some of the most effective features to estimate the tolerance of wheat in response to stress factors. This project was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the project DROPS (EU-FP7 No. 244374).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly affected heading date.

Material
DH linese0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
heading datee0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Averaged over the DH lines, the heading date was significantly affected by irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased measured morphological parameters.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
morphological parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation significantly increased all the morphological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased spikelet number minima, maxima, and averages.

Treatment
Irrigatione1
Outcome
spikelet numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum and maximum values increased significantly for spikelet number, reproductive tiller number and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased reproductive tiller number minima, maxima, and averages.

Treatment
Irrigatione1
Outcome
reproductive tiller numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum and maximum values increased significantly for spikelet number, reproductive tiller number and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased plant height minima, maxima, and averages.

Treatment
Irrigatione1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum and maximum values increased significantly for spikelet number, reproductive tiller number and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased grain number per plant.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
total grain number per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation significantly increased the total grain number per plant, the thousand kernel weight and the grain yield averaged over the DH lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased thousand kernel weight.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
thousand kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation significantly increased the total grain number per plant, the thousand kernel weight and the grain yield averaged over the DH lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased grain yield.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
natural rain-fedt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation significantly increased the total grain number per plant, the thousand kernel weight and the grain yield averaged over the DH lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Natural Rain-Fed and Irrigated Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation was investigated on the morphological parameters and yield properties which changed due to well watered conditions in the wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–984 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological and yield traits were proposed as drought-tolerance indicators.

Outcome
features to estimate the tolerance of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“morphological parameters and yield components can still be some of the most effective features to estimate the tolerance of wheat in response to stress factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1729 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.