Paper · 2015 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of nitrogen fertiliser application rate on nitrogen partitioning, nitrogen use efficiency and nutritive value of forage kale

E Chakwizira; JM de Ruiter; S Maley

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.) has been linked to environmental pollution and negative animal health issues. An experiment with seven nitrogen (N) fertiliser application rates (0–500 kg N ha −1 ) was carried out at Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand to investigate N uptake, partitioning, apparent N use efficiency (aNUE) and nutritive value of forage kale. Final harvest dry matter (DM) yield increased four‐fold to 25.5 t ha −1 when 500 kg N ha −1 was applied compared with the 0 kg N ha −1 crops, and N uptake by five‐fold to 425 kg ha −1 . The inability of the crops receiving ≤100 kg N ha −1 to attain critical leaf area index and critical level of specific leaf nitrogen content resulted in lower DM yield compared with the higher N fertiliser application rates. The aNUE decreased from 111.6 kg DM kg −1 N for the 50 kg N ha −1 crops to 37.5 kg DM kg −1 N for the 500 kg N ha −1 crops. Nitrogen fertiliser application rate had no systematic effect on the crude fibre content of the kale crops. The crude protein content was unaffected by N supply, and ranged between 7.7% and 10.5%. Under conditions of optimal water and nutrient supply on deep soils with high water‐holding capacity and long growing season (c. 7 months), it is recommended that N fertiliser is applied at 300 kg N ha −1 to achieve a yield of about 22 t ha −1 and aNUE of ≥51 kg DM kg −1 N applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield of forage kale was four-fold higher at 500 kg N ha −1 than at 0 kg N ha −1, reaching 25.5 t ha −1.

Taxon
forage kalee0
Treatment
500 kg N ha −1e2
Outcome
Final harvest dry matter (DM) yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
25.5 t ha −1e4
Comparator
0 kg N ha −1 cropse2
Setting
Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealande1

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“was carried out at Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–284 · show in text ↑
e2

“when 500 kg N ha −1 was applied compared with the 0 kg N ha −1 crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–533 · show in text ↑
e3

“Final harvest dry matter (DM) yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–438 · show in text ↑
e4

“to 25.5 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake of forage kale was five-fold higher at 500 kg N ha −1 than at 0 kg N ha −1, reaching 425 kg ha −1.

Taxon
forage kalee0
Treatment
500 kg N ha −1e2
Outcome
N uptakee5
Direction
increasede3
Value
425 kg ha −1e6
Comparator
0 kg N ha −1 cropse2

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“when 500 kg N ha −1 was applied compared with the 0 kg N ha −1 crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–533 · show in text ↑
e3

“Final harvest dry matter (DM) yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–438 · show in text ↑
e5

“N uptake by five”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–555 · show in text ↑
e6

“to 425 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent N use efficiency of forage kale decreased from 111.6 to 37.5 kg DM kg −1 N as N rate rose from 50 to 500 kg N ha −1.

Taxon
forage kalee0
Treatment
500 kg N ha −1e7
Outcome
aNUEe7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
37.5 kg DM kg −1 Ne7
Qualifier
111.6 kg DM kg −1 Ne7
Comparator
50 kg N ha −1 cropse7

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“The aNUE decreased from 111.6 kg DM kg −1 N for the 50 kg N ha −1 crops to 37.5 kg DM kg −1 N for the 500 kg N ha −1 crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertiliser application rate had no systematic effect on the crude fibre content of forage kale.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertiliser application ratee1
Outcome
crude fibre contente1
Direction
no systematic effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertiliser application rate had no systematic effect on the crude fibre content of the kale crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N supply did not affect the crude protein content of forage kale.

Taxon
forage kalee0
Treatment
N supplye1
Outcome
crude protein contente1
Direction
unaffectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The crude protein content was unaffected by N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content of forage kale ranged between 7.7% and 10.5%.

Taxon
forage kalee0
Outcome
crude protein contente1
Value
7.7% and 10.5%e7

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The crude protein content was unaffected by N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1088 · show in text ↑
e7

“ranged between 7.7% and 10.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N fertiliser at 300 kg N ha −1 is recommended to achieve a yield of about 22 t ha −1 and an aNUE of at least 51 kg DM kg −1 N.

Taxon
forage kalee0
Outcome
N fertiliser is applied at 300 kg N ha −1e6
Qualifier
to achieve a yield of about 22 t ha −1e6

Verbatim

e0

“Winter grazing of forage kale ( Brassica oleracea var. acephala L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“N fertiliser is applied at 300 kg N ha −1 to achieve a yield of about 22 t ha −1 and aNUE of ≥51 kg DM kg −1 N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1406 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 35 positive, 11 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.