Paper · 2013 · EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Bioassociative effect of rhizospheric microorganisms on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Nisha Kadian; Kudleep Yadav; Ashok Aggarwal

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen applications have generated great interests in agriculture, with much of its success associated with increasing the uptake ofnitrogen by crops while reducing pollution by this chemical fertilizer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interactive effect ofrhizospheric microorganisms on nutrient uptake, yield and growth of mung bean grown in pots under glasshouse conditions. The resultsrevealed that the growth, in terms of morphology and physiology, of all the inoculated plants was better than that of the control plants. Interms of growth, plant height, fresh and dry weights and length of the roots plants inoculated with both Funneliformis mosseae + T. viridedid best. Total chlorophyll content, alkaline and acidic phosphatase activities were greatest when inoculated with only F. mosseae and freshand dry weights of shoots when inoculated only with T. viride. Significant increase in N and P uptake was recorded when inoculated withboth F. mosseae + T. viride. Overall the significant increase in growth and development was due to positive interactions among rhizosphericmicroorganisms leading to healthy and vigorously growing plants. However, there is now a need for field trails of this technique.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated mung bean plants had better morphological and physiological growth than controls.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
growth, in terms of morphology and physiologye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the growth, in terms of morphology and physiology, of all the inoculated plants was better than that of the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Funneliformis mosseae and T. viride inoculation gave the best plant height, weights and root length.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated with both Funneliformis mosseae + T. viridee0
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Second interactor
T. viridee0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, fresh and dry weights and length of the rootse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, fresh and dry weights and length of the roots plants inoculated with both Funneliformis mosseae + T. viridedid best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae alone gave the greatest chlorophyll content and phosphatase activities.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated with only F. mosseaee0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
Total chlorophyll content, alkaline and acidic phosphatase activitiese0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total chlorophyll content, alkaline and acidic phosphatase activities were greatest when inoculated with only F. mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride alone gave the greatest fresh and dry shoot weights.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated only with T. viridee0
Interactor
T. viridee0symbiont
Outcome
freshand dry weights of shootse0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“freshand dry weights of shoots when inoculated only with T. viride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined F. mosseae and T. viride inoculation significantly increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated withboth F. mosseae + T. viridee0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Second interactor
T. viridee0symbiont
Outcome
N and P uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant increase in N and P uptake was recorded when inoculated withboth F. mosseae + T. viride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–988 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute greater growth to positive interactions among rhizospheric microorganisms.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
increase in growth and developmente0
Qualifier
positive interactions among rhizosphericmicroorganismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in growth and development was due to positive interactions among rhizosphericmicroorganisms leading to healthy and vigorously growing plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1163 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for field trials of the inoculation technique.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
field trails of this techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“there is now a need for field trails of this technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1228 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 60 positive, 1 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.