Paper · 2008

Thinning of organic apple production with Potassic Soap and Calcium Polysulfide at the North of Spain.

Enrique Dapena de la Fuente; Alfonso Fernández-Ceballos

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Asturias, in the North West coast of Spain, is a region with old tradition at cultivation of apple and its transformation to cider. The production of apple is mainly done under traditional uses and semi-extensive or semi-intensive system and with local cultivars. Thinning strategy is little practiced and the biennial bearing cycle is one of the main problems for the farmers. The production of apple under organic techniques in Asturias is still limited but increasing. Since 2005, experiments have been conducted on several cultivars (‘Raxao’, ‘Xuanina’ and ‘Gold-Rush’) to evaluate the effects of Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfide as thinning products. We present here the first promising results of these experiments. With different concentrations of both products we have increased the apple production of two cultivars for the period 2006- 2007. There were positive effects on the vegetative growth of the trees and on the quality of apples. In the spring 2007 we initiated new experiments with other cultivars (‘Durona de Tresali’, ‘Solarina’, ‘Raxao’, ‘Regona’) in order to confirm our results. The new experiments also include the comparison of their effects with those of commonly used chemical products and with those of manual thinning techniques.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassic Soap and Calcium Polysulfide thinning increased apple production of two cultivars in 2006-2007

Material
two cultivarse1
Treatment
Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfidee2
Outcome
apple productione1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
for the period 2006- 2007e1
Setting
Asturiase0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Asturias, in the North West coast of Spain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“With different concentrations of both products we have increased the apple production of two cultivars for the period 2006- 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“to evaluate the effects of Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfide as thinning products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassic Soap and Calcium Polysulfide thinning had positive effects on the vegetative growth of apple trees

Treatment
Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfidee2
Outcome
vegetative growth of the treese3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“With different concentrations of both products we have increased the apple production of two cultivars for the period 2006- 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“to evaluate the effects of Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfide as thinning products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–687 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were positive effects on the vegetative growth of the trees and on the quality of apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassic Soap and Calcium Polysulfide thinning had positive effects on the quality of apples

Treatment
Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfidee2
Outcome
quality of applese3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“With different concentrations of both products we have increased the apple production of two cultivars for the period 2006- 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“to evaluate the effects of Potassic Soap (with or without olive oil) and Calcium Polysulfide as thinning products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–687 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were positive effects on the vegetative growth of the trees and on the quality of apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–979 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

calcium atom · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.