Paper · 2015 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Dissection of drought response of modern and underutilized wheat varieties according to Passioura's yield-water framework

Alireza Nakhforoosh; Heinrich Grausgruber; Hans-Peter Kaul; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Trait-based breeding is essential to improve wheat yield, particularly when stress adaptation is targeted. A set of modern and underutilized wheat genotypes was examined in a 2-year field experiment with distinct seasonal water supply. Yield formation and drought response strategies were analyzed in relation to components of Passioura's yield-water framework based on phenological, morphological, physiological, and root characteristics. Limited water supply resulted in 60% yield loss and substantially lower water use (37%), water use efficiency (32.6%), and harvest index (14%). Phenology and root length density were key determinants of water use. Late flowering underutilized wheat species with large root system and swift ground coverage showed greatest water use. Leaf chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance were higher in modern cultivars, supporting their high biomass growth and superior water use efficiency. While, lower chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance of underutilized wheats indicated a water saving strategy with an intrinsic limitation of potential growth. Harvest index was strongly dependent on phenology and yield components. Optimized flowering time, reduced tillering, and strong grain sink of modern cultivars explained higher harvest index compared to underutilized wheats. Cluster analysis revealed the consistent differentiation of underutilized and modern wheats based on traits underlying Passioura's yield-water framework. We identified physiological and root traits within modern cultivars to be targeted for trait-based crop improvement under water-limited conditions. High capacity of water use in underutilized genetic resources is related to yield-limiting phenological and morphological traits, constraining their potential role for better drought resistance. Still some genetic resources provide adaptive features for stress resistance compatible with high yield as revealed by high harvest index under drought of Khorasan wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited water reduced wheat yield by 60%.

Treatment
Limited water supplye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
losse0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited water supply resulted in 60% yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited water reduced wheat water use by 37%.

Treatment
Limited water supplye0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited water supply resulted in 60% yield loss and substantially lower water use (37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited water reduced wheat water use efficiency by 32.6%.

Treatment
Limited water supplye0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
32.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited water supply resulted in 60% yield loss and substantially lower water use (37%), water use efficiency (32.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited water reduced wheat harvest index by 14%.

Treatment
Limited water supplye0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited water supply resulted in 60% yield loss and substantially lower water use (37%), water use efficiency (32.6%), and harvest index (14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat phenology and root length density were key determinants of water use.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
water usee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenology and root length density were key determinants of water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late flowering underutilized wheat with large roots and rapid ground cover had greatest water use.

Material
underutilized wheat speciese0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late flowering underutilized wheat species with large root system and swift ground coverage showed greatest water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–771 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern wheat cultivars had higher leaf chlorophyll than underutilized wheats.

Material
modern cultivarse0
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
underutilized wheatse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance were higher in modern cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance of underutilized wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern wheat cultivars had higher stomatal conductance than underutilized wheats.

Material
modern cultivarse0
Outcome
stomata conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
underutilized wheatse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance were higher in modern cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance of underutilized wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern cultivars had higher biomass growth and water use efficiency.

Material
modern cultivarse1
Outcome
biomass growth and superior water use efficiencye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their high biomass growth and superior water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf chlorophyll concentration and stomata conductance were higher in modern cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index depended strongly on wheat phenology and yield components.

Organ / stage
phenologye0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index was strongly dependent on phenology and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern cultivars had higher harvest index than underutilized wheats, attributed to flowering time, tillering, and grain sink.

Material
modern cultivarse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Qualifier
Optimized flowering time, reduced tillering, and strong grain sinke0
Comparator
underutilized wheatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimized flowering time, reduced tillering, and strong grain sink of modern cultivars explained higher harvest index compared to underutilized wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis consistently distinguished modern and underutilized wheat by yield-water traits.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Outcome
differentiation of underutilized and modern wheatse0
Comparator
modern wheatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster analysis revealed the consistent differentiation of underutilized and modern wheats based on traits underlying Passioura's yield-water framework”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1480 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified physiological and root traits in modern cultivars as crop improvement targets under limited water.

Outcome
physiological and root traits within modern cultivars to be targeted for trait-based crop improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We identified physiological and root traits within modern cultivars to be targeted for trait-based crop improvement under water-limited conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Underutilized wheat water use capacity was linked to yield-limiting phenological and morphological traits.

Material
underutilized genetic resourcese0
Organ / stage
phenological and morphological traitse0
Outcome
High capacity of water usee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High capacity of water use in underutilized genetic resources is related to yield-limiting phenological and morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Khorasan wheat had high harvest index under drought.

Taxon
Khorasan wheate0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

e0

“high harvest index under drought of Khorasan wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–1994 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.