Paper · 2014 · Agricultural and Food Science

Influence of colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on three strawberry cultivars under salty conditions

Grant Sinclair; Christiane Charest; Yolande Dalpé; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant adaptation to hyperosmotic environments is generally associated with reduced growth and ultimately yield loss, making farming difficult. The potential of mycorrhizal symbioses to alleviate salt stress has been documented and benefits to plant revealed to be specific and dependent to both plant cultivars and fungal strains. A factorial greenhouse experiment was performed to determine the effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) species (Funneliformis caledonius, F. mosseae and Rhizophagus irregularis) on three ‘day-neutral’ strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars (‘Albion’, ‘Charlotte’ and ‘Seascape’), and a mixture of R. irregularis and F. mosseae on ‘Seascape’, under four salt conditions (0–200 mM NaCl). The overall results showed that plant biomass decreased with increasing salinity. The cultivars responded differently to both AMF and salinity, and ‘Seascape’ was more tolerant to salinity than the other cultivars. AMF enhanced plant growth and improved salt tolerance by increasing the proportion of medium (0.5<ɸ≤1.5 mm) and coarse (ɸ>1.5 mm) diameter roots. The mixture of two AMF species increased root and shoot mass to a higher degree than each species alone at low salinity (0–50 mM) but reduced fruit quality. At higher levels (100–200 mM), R. irregularis alleviated salt stress and improved fruit quality to a higher degree than the other AMF species. Our results support the use of bio-inoculants in saline horticultural areas. Because cultivars respond differently to fungal inoculants, and inoculants prefer specific environmental conditions, fungal inoculants need to be screened on a cultivar- and condition-specific basis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry biomass decreased as salinity increased.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant biomass decreased with increasing salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars responded differently to AMF and salinity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
salinitye0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
responded differentlye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars responded differently to both AMF and salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seascape was more salt tolerant than the other cultivars.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’e0
Outcome
tolerant to salinitye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Seascape’ was more tolerant to salinity than the other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF enhanced strawberry growth and salt tolerance.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and improved salt tolerancee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF enhanced plant growth and improved salt tolerance by increasing the proportion of medium (0.5<ɸ≤1.5 mm) and coarse (ɸ>1.5 mm) diameter roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased the share of medium and coarse diameter roots.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
proportion of medium (0.5<ɸ≤1.5 mm) and coarse (ɸ>1.5 mm) diameter rootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF enhanced plant growth and improved salt tolerance by increasing the proportion of medium (0.5<ɸ≤1.5 mm) and coarse (ɸ>1.5 mm) diameter roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A two-AMF mixture increased root and shoot mass more than either species alone at low salinity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
mixture of two AMF speciese0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot masse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
low salinity (0–50 mM)e0
Comparator
each species alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of two AMF species increased root and shoot mass to a higher degree than each species alone at low salinity (0–50 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two-AMF mixture reduced fruit quality at low salinity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
mixture of two AMF speciese0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
low salinity (0–50 mM)e0
Comparator
each species alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture of two AMF species increased root and shoot mass to a higher degree than each species alone at low salinity (0–50 mM) but reduced fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100–200 mM salinity, R. irregularis alleviated salt stress more than other AMF.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
R. irregularise0
Interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
salt stresse0
Direction
alleviatede0
Qualifier
higher levels (100–200 mM)e0
Comparator
other AMF speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher levels (100–200 mM), R. irregularis alleviated salt stress and improved fruit quality to a higher degree than the other AMF species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100–200 mM salinity, R. irregularis improved fruit quality more than other AMF.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
R. irregularise0
Interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
higher levels (100–200 mM)e0
Comparator
other AMF speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher levels (100–200 mM), R. irregularis alleviated salt stress and improved fruit quality to a higher degree than the other AMF species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support bio-inoculants in saline horticultural areas.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
use of bio-inoculantse0
Setting
saline horticultural arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results support the use of bio-inoculants in saline horticultural areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend screening inoculants by cultivar and conditions.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
fungal inoculants need to be screened on a cultivar- and condition-specific basise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal inoculants need to be screened on a cultivar- and condition-specific basis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

mycorrhiza · tolerance: abiotic · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.