Paper · 2013 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Yield and Photosynthetic Response to Simulated Insect Defoliation and Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Feeding

Fatima Mustafa

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Insect herbivory can affect morphology and physiological functions of plants. Defoliation caused by herbivores may alter photosynthetic rates of remaining plant tissues or reduce the leaf area and limit the photosynthate needed to fulfill the energy and nutritional requirements of the plants. The reduction in plant leaf area may reduce the quality and quantity of biomass, which is critical for bioenergy crops. Plants may also compensate for herbivory losses utilizing their energy and resulting in less vigorous plants. Two switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars, Shawnee (upland) and Kanlow (lowland), were evaluated for yield response to simulated leaf-mass consumption. The data showed no significant effect of up to 80% simulated insect defoliation on the yield of switchgrass under suitable weather conditions. During the first year of the study with abundant rainfall, a significant reduction in leaf area index (LAI) did not result in a significant effect on switchgrass yield. However, the following year, drought occurred and resulted in significant yield reduction, along with reductions in LAI and percent light interception. Switchgrass cultivars (Shawnee and Kanlow) were tested for their photosynthetic response to simulated leaf injury. Mechanical defoliation with different insect feeding patterns was applied to individual leaves to determine the effect on photosynthetic rates. No significant differences among various patterns of tissue removal were recorded in Kanlow. However, during 2011, double edge cutting treatment significantly reduced the photosynthetic rates in Shawnee. Significant reductions in photosynthetic rates were recorded over time in Kanlow for both years. Photosynthetic rates differed significantly between the years even prior to treatment, likely as a result of water stress in the second year. The actual feeding rates of nymphs and adults of red-legged grasshopper, Melanoplus femurrubrum (DeGeer) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) were quantified. The average leaf area consumed and the weight gained by each stage of grasshopper were measured after three days of feeding. The results of the study indicated that the third instar of M. femurrubrum consumed the maximum amount per unit of body weight per day while the maximum weight gain was observed in adults and the fifth instars. These results may explain the higher metabolic rates and digestive efficiencies of early instar grasshoppers. The study results suggest control of grasshoppers at early stages is needed to avoid potential economic losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 80% simulated insect defoliation had no significant effect on switchgrass yield under suitable weather.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatume0
Treatment
up to 80% simulated insect defoliatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Qualifier
under suitable weather conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant effect of up to 80% simulated insect defoliation on the yield of switchgrass under suitable weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the rainy first year, leaf area index was significantly reduced.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
first year of the study with abundant rainfalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first year of the study with abundant rainfall, a significant reduction in leaf area index (LAI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the rainy first year, the reduced leaf area index did not significantly affect switchgrass yield.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatume0
Organ / stage
leaf area index (LAI)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not result in a significant effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant reduction in leaf area index (LAI) did not result in a significant effect on switchgrass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought in the following year significantly reduced switchgrass yield.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the following year, drought occurred and resulted in significant yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought in the following year reduced leaf area index and percent light interception.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
LAI and percent light interceptione0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought occurred and resulted in significant yield reduction, along with reductions in LAI and percent light interception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Patterns of tissue removal did not significantly differ in photosynthetic response in Kanlow.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Material
Kanlowe0
Treatment
various patterns of tissue removale0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese1
Direction
No significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences among various patterns of tissue removal were recorded in Kanlow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on photosynthetic rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double edge cutting significantly reduced photosynthetic rates in Shawnee in 2011.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Material
Shawneee0
Treatment
double edge cutting treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
during 2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during 2011, double edge cutting treatment significantly reduced the photosynthetic rates in Shawnee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rates in Kanlow significantly decreased over time in both years.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Material
Kanlowe0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
over timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reductions in photosynthetic rates were recorded over time in Kanlow for both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rates differed significantly between years before treatment.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
differede0
Qualifier
prior to treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rates differed significantly between the years even prior to treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress in the second year was proposed as the reason for the pretreatment photosynthetic difference.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Photosynthetic rates differed significantly between the yearse0
Qualifier
likelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rates differed significantly between the years even prior to treatment, likely as a result of water stress in the second year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-instar M. femurrubrum consumed the most switchgrass leaf area per body weight per day.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Organ / stage
third instare0
Interactor
M. femurrubrumMelanoplus femurrubrume0pest
Outcome
leaf area consumede1
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melanoplus femurrubrum
Melanoplus femurrubrum · InteractorRhododendrites · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the third instar of M. femurrubrum consumed the maximum amount per unit of body weight per day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2159–2253 · show in text ↑
e1

“average leaf area consumed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1998–2024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult and fifth-instar grasshoppers had the maximum weight gain after feeding.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Organ / stage
adults and the fifth instarse0
Interactor
M. femurrubrumMelanoplus femurrubrume1pest
Outcome
weight gaine0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melanoplus femurrubrum
Melanoplus femurrubrum · InteractorRhododendrites · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum weight gain was observed in adults and the fifth instars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2260–2328 · show in text ↑
e1

“M. femurrubrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend controlling grasshoppers at early stages to avoid potential economic losses.

Taxon
SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Interactor
grasshoppersAcridomorphae0pest
Outcome
control of grasshoppers at early stagese0
Qualifier
to avoid potential economic lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of grasshoppers at early stages is needed to avoid potential economic losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)Results differ

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · growth · Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.