Paper · 2015 · Grassland Science

Organic cultivation system of corn–triticale rotation using white clover living mulch

Shin Deguchi; Sunao Uozumi; Makoto Kaneko; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract We conducted an on‐farm experiment to establish corn–triticale rotational cropping system for producing organic forage, using white clover living mulch ( LM ). A 2‐ha experimental field has been managed according to the Japanese Agricultural Standard for organic feed production since 2003, and two cropping systems ( LM and tillage cultivation [ TC ]) combined with two compost application methods (with and without compost application before planting) were tested as four corn cultivation treatments from 2008 to 2009. White clover was sown in the autumn of 2008, and corn was cultivated from June to October 2009 using the four treatments and without any application of chemical herbicides and fertilizers. After the corn harvest, the two treatments of compost application were set up again within each corn cultivation treatment, resulting in a total of eight treatments. Triticale was cultivated in those treatments from October 2009 to June 2010, without chemical herbicides or fertilizers. The results of the treatments showed that LM suppressed weed growth and increased nitrogen (N) uptake and yield of corn compared to the TC treatment. The dry matter yields of corn were the highest and the dry weight of the weeds were the lowest in the LM treatment with compost application before planting. Furthermore, the positive effect of LM on N supply was preserved during the cropping of triticale. Therefore, we concluded that the total dry matter yield of forage crops in corn–triticale rotation could be increased by using white clover LM with compost application to suppress weed growth and to increase the N uptake both of the main and succeeding crops. White clover LM is a useful cultivation technique for organic production of forage crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover living mulch suppressed weed growth relative to tillage cultivation.

Treatment
LMe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
TC treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LM suppressed weed growth and increased nitrogen (N) uptake and yield of corn compared to the TC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“White clover living mulch ( LM )”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 135–167 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch increased corn nitrogen uptake relative to tillage.

Treatment
LMe0
Outcome
nitrogen (N) uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
TC treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LM suppressed weed growth and increased nitrogen (N) uptake and yield of corn compared to the TC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch increased corn yield relative to tillage.

Treatment
LMe0
Outcome
yield of corne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
TC treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LM suppressed weed growth and increased nitrogen (N) uptake and yield of corn compared to the TC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn dry matter yield was highest under living mulch with preplant compost.

Treatment
LM treatment with compost application before plantinge0
Outcome
dry matter yields of corne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter yields of corn were the highest and the dry weight of the weeds were the lowest in the LM treatment with compost application before planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry weight was lowest under living mulch with preplant compost.

Treatment
LM treatment with compost application before plantinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of the weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter yields of corn were the highest and the dry weight of the weeds were the lowest in the LM treatment with compost application before planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive nitrogen supply effect of living mulch persisted during triticale cropping.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
LMe0
Outcome
N supplye0
Direction
preservede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the positive effect of LM on N supply was preserved during the cropping of triticale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1411 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded living mulch with compost could increase total rotation dry matter yield.

Treatment
white clover LM with compost applicatione0
Outcome
total dry matter yield of forage cropse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total dry matter yield of forage crops in corn–triticale rotation could be increased by using white clover LM with compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend white clover living mulch for organic forage production.

Outcome
White clover LM is a useful cultivation technique for organic production of forage cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“White clover LM is a useful cultivation technique for organic production of forage crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn–triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑

cover crop · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

48 papers: 36 positive, 12 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

cover crop · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.