Paper · 2000 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID

MOSTAFA H. H. GHOURAB; GAMALAT A. WAHDAN

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Gemmiza Research Sta­tion. during 1996 and 1997 seasons to study the effect of Ascobine compound and ascorbic acid on cotton plants cv. Giza 75. Ascobine (containing 25% ascorbic acid and 13% citric acid) at two rates, 200 and 400 g per feddan, and ascorbic acid at three rates of 200, 300 and 400 ppm were sprayed on cotton plants either once at start of flower­ing or twice i.e., at start and at peak of flowering. The obtained results showed that one spray of ascobine or ascor­bic acid increased plant height significantly. One spray of ascobine at a rate of 400 g/fed. and two sprays of Ascorbic acid at a rate of 200 ppm tended to increase the number of fruiting branches per plant significatly. Spraying ascobine or ascorbic acid seemed to increase number of open bolls per plant, as a result of reducing boll shedding. In cotton leaves, all chlorophyll forms.i.e., chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll increased sig­nificantly by spraying these compounds either once or twice. The hgih­•est levels of reducing sugars and total soluble sugars were observed when 300 ppm ascorbic acid was sprayed at start of flowering. One or two sprays did not affect boll weight, however 200 g/led. ascobine pro­duced the highet value of boll weight. Number of sprays did not affect lint percentage, earliness of yield (except for ascorbic acid at 200 ppm in 1996), and seed cotton yield. Various concentration of ascobine and ascorbic acid affected fiber properties insigificantly. Oil seed conent was increased significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One spray of Ascobine increased plant height significantly.

Treatment
one spray of ascobinee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one spray of ascobine or ascor­bic acid increased plant height significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One spray of ascorbic acid increased plant height significantly.

Treatment
ascor­bic acide0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one spray of ascobine or ascor­bic acid increased plant height significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One 400 g/fed Ascobine spray increased fruiting branches.

Treatment
One spray of ascobine at a rate of 400 g/fed.e0
Outcome
number of fruiting branches per plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One spray of ascobine at a rate of 400 g/fed. and two sprays of Ascorbic acid at a rate of 200 ppm tended to increase the number of fruiting branches per plant significatly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two 200 ppm ascorbic acid sprays increased fruiting branches.

Treatment
two sprays of Ascorbic acid at a rate of 200 ppme0
Outcome
number of fruiting branches per plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One spray of ascobine at a rate of 400 g/fed. and two sprays of Ascorbic acid at a rate of 200 ppm tended to increase the number of fruiting branches per plant significatly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascobine sprays appeared to increase open bolls and reduce shedding.

Treatment
Spraying ascobinee0
Outcome
number of open bolls per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
reducing boll sheddinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying ascobine or ascorbic acid seemed to increase number of open bolls per plant, as a result of reducing boll shedding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid sprays appeared to increase open bolls and reduce shedding.

Treatment
ascorbic acide0
Outcome
number of open bolls per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
reducing boll sheddinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying ascobine or ascorbic acid seemed to increase number of open bolls per plant, as a result of reducing boll shedding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll.

Treatment
spraying these compounds either once or twicee0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all chlorophyll forms.i.e., chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll increased sig­nificantly by spraying these compounds either once or twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

300 ppm ascorbic acid at flowering yielded the highest reducing and soluble sugars.

Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
300 ppm ascorbic acide0
Outcome
reducing sugars and total soluble sugarse0
Direction
hgih­•este0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hgih­•est levels of reducing sugars and total soluble sugars were observed when 300 ppm ascorbic acid was sprayed at start of flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of sprays did not affect boll weight.

Treatment
One or two sprayse0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One or two sprays did not affect boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 g/led Ascobine produced the highest boll weight.

Treatment
200 g/led. ascobinee0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
highete0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“200 g/led. ascobine pro­duced the highet value of boll weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray number did not affect lint percentage, earliness or seed cotton yield.

Treatment
Number of sprayse0
Outcome
lint percentage, earliness of yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
except for ascorbic acid at 200 ppm in 1996e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of sprays did not affect lint percentage, earliness of yield (except for ascorbic acid at 200 ppm in 1996), and seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascobine and ascorbic acid concentrations had insignificant effects on fiber properties.

Treatment
Various concentration of ascobine and ascorbic acide0
Outcome
fiber propertiese0
Direction
insigificantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various concentration of ascobine and ascorbic acid affected fiber properties insigificantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed oil content increased significantly.

Outcome
Oil seed conente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oil seed conent was increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“RESPONSE OF COTTON PLANTS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ASCOBINE AND ASCORBIC ACID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑

ascorbic acid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ascorbic acid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.