Paper · 1994 · Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation

Response to iron and manganese application as affected by their availability in a Typic Natraqualf

A. K. Srivastava; O. P. Srivastava

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Waterlogging of sodic soils varying widely in pH values, ECe, and Exchangeable Sodium Percentages (ESP) increased the availability of Fe by 3.9‐fold and Mn by 3.3‐fold compared with availability of Fe at field capacity soil moisture content over a 14‐day period. Gypsum treatment of sodic soils under waterlogged conditions further improved the available Fe and Mn status above their critical limits. When additional Fe or Mn was applied, there was no response in yield or uptake of Fe or Mn by rice (Oryza sativa L.) or wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Key words: ironmanganesesodic soilfield capacitywaterloggingresponse

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging raised soil available iron 3.9-fold.

Outcome
availability of Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.9‐folde0
Comparator
field capacity soil moisture contente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging of sodic soils varying widely in pH values, ECe, and Exchangeable Sodium Percentages (ESP) increased the availability of Fe by 3.9‐fold and Mn by 3.3‐fold compared with availability of Fe at field capacity soil moisture content over a 14‐day period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging raised soil available manganese 3.3-fold.

Outcome
Mne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3‐folde0
Comparator
field capacity soil moisture contente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging of sodic soils varying widely in pH values, ECe, and Exchangeable Sodium Percentages (ESP) increased the availability of Fe by 3.9‐fold and Mn by 3.3‐fold compared with availability of Fe at field capacity soil moisture content over a 14‐day period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum further improved available iron in waterlogged sodic soil above its critical limit.

Treatment
Gypsum treatmente0
Outcome
available Fee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum treatment of sodic soils under waterlogged conditions further improved the available Fe and Mn status above their critical limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum further improved available manganese in waterlogged sodic soil above its critical limit.

Treatment
Gypsum treatmente0
Outcome
Mn statuse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum treatment of sodic soils under waterlogged conditions further improved the available Fe and Mn status above their critical limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional iron did not change rice yield or iron or manganese uptake.

Treatment
additional Fee0
Outcome
yield or uptake of Fe or Mne0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When additional Fe or Mn was applied, there was no response in yield or uptake of Fe or Mn by rice (Oryza sativa L.) or wheat (Triticum aestivum L).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional manganese did not change rice yield or iron or manganese uptake.

Treatment
Mn was appliede0
Outcome
yield or uptake of Fe or Mne0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When additional Fe or Mn was applied, there was no response in yield or uptake of Fe or Mn by rice (Oryza sativa L.) or wheat (Triticum aestivum L).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional iron did not change wheat yield or iron or manganese uptake.

Treatment
additional Fee0
Outcome
yield or uptake of Fe or Mne0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When additional Fe or Mn was applied, there was no response in yield or uptake of Fe or Mn by rice (Oryza sativa L.) or wheat (Triticum aestivum L).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional manganese did not change wheat yield or iron or manganese uptake.

Treatment
Mn was appliede0
Outcome
yield or uptake of Fe or Mne0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When additional Fe or Mn was applied, there was no response in yield or uptake of Fe or Mn by rice (Oryza sativa L.) or wheat (Triticum aestivum L).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–549 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Manganese deficiency reduced tiller number in wheat compared with adequate Mn supply.

    Manganese Deficiency and Toxicity Effects on Growth, Development, and Nutrient Composition in Wheat1 · 1984 · compared with plants supplied at adequate Mn levels

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

iron atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

71 papers: 57 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.