Paper · 2001 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

ALUMINUM EFFECTS ON FATTY ACID COMPOSITION AND LIPID PEROXIDATION OF A PURIFIED PLASMA MEMBRANE FRACTION OF ROOT APICES OF TWO SORGHUM CULTIVARS

P. H. P. Peixoto; J. Cambraia; R. Sant'Anna; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Aluminum (Al) effects on fatty acid composition and on the lipid peroxidation of a purified plasma membrane fraction of root apices of two sorghum cultivars were studied. Palmitic and linoleic acids were the major fatty acids in the root apices of sorghum, independent of the Al presence in nutrient solution. After Al treatment, the C18:0/C18:3 and C18:2/C18:3 ratios increased, while the C18:2/C16:0 ratio remained unchanged in the Al-sensitive cultivar but all three ratios decreased in the Al-tolerant cultivar. The double bond index and unsaturated fatty acid/saturated fatty acid ratio decreased in both cultivars but with higher intensity in the Al-sensitive cultivar. The linolenic and palmitic acids were probably the most important fatty acids associated with Al tolerance in the two sorghum cultivar studied. In the presence of Al, these two fatty acids decreased in the Al-sensitive cultivar but increased in the Al-tolerant cultivar. Plasma membranes obtained from the entire root system of the Al-sensitive cultivar showed higher concentration of malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex than the Al-tolerant cultivar, independent of the Al treatment. In root apices, in the absence of Al, there was no difference between cultivars. In the presence of Al, however, the concentration of the malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex increased about 43% but only in the Al-sensitive cultivar. So, under Al treatment, the Al-sensitive cultivar produced 36% more malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex than the Al-tolerant cultivar, which was taken as indicative of higher reactive oxygen species production and higher fatty acid peroxidation of the plasma membrane of this cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmitic and linoleic acids were the major fatty acids in sorghum root apices, independent of Al in the nutrient solution.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Organ / stage
root apicese0
Outcome
Palmitic and linoleic acids were the major fatty acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmitic and linoleic acids were the major fatty acids in the root apices of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After Al treatment, the C18:0/C18:3 and C18:2/C18:3 ratios increased in the Al-sensitive sorghum cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment
Al treatmente0
Outcome
C18:0/C18:3 and C18:2/C18:3 ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“After Al treatment, the C18:0/C18:3 and C18:2/C18:3 ratios increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After Al treatment, the C18:2/C16:0 ratio remained unchanged in the Al-sensitive sorghum cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-sensitive cultivare0
Outcome
C18:2/C16:0 ratioe0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“while the C18:2/C16:0 ratio remained unchanged in the Al-sensitive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After Al treatment, all three fatty acid ratios decreased in the Al-tolerant sorghum cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-tolerant cultivare0
Outcome
all three ratiose0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“but all three ratios decreased in the Al-tolerant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The double bond index and unsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratio decreased in both cultivars after Al, with higher intensity in the Al-sensitive cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Outcome
double bond index and unsaturated fatty acid/saturated fatty acid ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
higher intensity in the Al-sensitive cultivare0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The double bond index and unsaturated fatty acid/saturated fatty acid ratio decreased in both cultivars but with higher intensity in the Al-sensitive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–674 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linolenic and palmitic acids were probably the most important fatty acids associated with Al tolerance in the two sorghum cultivars.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Al tolerancee0
Outcome
linolenic and palmitic acidse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The linolenic and palmitic acids were probably the most important fatty acids associated with Al tolerance in the two sorghum cultivar studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the presence of Al, linolenic and palmitic acids decreased in the Al-sensitive cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-sensitive cultivare0
Treatment
presence of Ale0
Outcome
these two fatty acidse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the presence of Al, these two fatty acids decreased in the Al-sensitive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the presence of Al, linolenic and palmitic acids increased in the Al-tolerant cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-tolerant cultivare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“but increased in the Al-tolerant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–945 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasma membranes from the whole root system of the Al-sensitive cultivar had higher malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex concentration than the Al-tolerant cultivar, independent of Al treatment.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-sensitive cultivare0
Outcome
concentration of malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Al-tolerant cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plasma membranes obtained from the entire root system of the Al-sensitive cultivar showed higher concentration of malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex than the Al-tolerant cultivar, independent of the Al treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In root apices without Al, malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex did not differ between the two cultivars.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Organ / stage
root apicese0
Outcome
no difference between cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“In root apices, in the absence of Al, there was no difference between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In root apices in the presence of Al, malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex increased about 43% only in the Al-sensitive cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-sensitive cultivare0
Treatment
presence of Ale0
Outcome
concentration of the malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the presence of Al, however, the concentration of the malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex increased about 43% but only in the Al-sensitive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1404 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Al treatment, the Al-sensitive cultivar produced 36% more malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex than the Al-tolerant cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Al-sensitive cultivare0
Outcome
malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complexe0
Direction
moree0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
Al-tolerant cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“under Al treatment, the Al-sensitive cultivar produced 36% more malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex than the Al-tolerant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1545 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher malonaldehyde-thiobarbituric acid complex was taken as indicative of higher reactive oxygen species production and fatty acid peroxidation of the plasma membrane in the Al-sensitive cultivar.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Outcome
higher fatty acid peroxidation of the plasma membranee0
Qualifier
higher reactive oxygen species productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“which was taken as indicative of higher reactive oxygen species production and higher fatty acid peroxidation of the plasma membrane of this cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1696 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · SorghumResults differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.