Paper · 2011 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Enhancing cropping of Navel orange by different agrochemicals foliar sprays

A ElKobbiabr; H Kassembr; H Marzoukbr; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out during the two successive growing seasonsof 2003 and 2004 on Washington Navel orange trees grown at El-Tarh region, El-BeheraGovernorate of Egypt. In order to study the effect of spraying the trees with differentagrochemicals on vegetative growth, fruit drop, fruit retention and yield. Trees were divided intotwo groups , the first group was subjected to the foliage treatments when the fruit reached pea size(5 mm in diameter) and the second group at marble size (15 mm in diameter). Foliar sprays ofurea or 2, 4-D alone at pea or marble stage significantly increased vegetative growth. In general,foliar sprays of 2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compounds at pea or marble stagesignificantly increased fruit retention and decreased fruit drop after June drop. Final fruit retentionwas increased (23 - 69% over the control) and pre-harvest fruit drop was decreased (63 to 100%compared to the control) by spraying boric acid or 2, 4-D alone at the pea stage in both seasons.Spraying calcium superphosphate alone at the marble stage caused an increase in final fruitretention by 33 - 7% and a decrease in pre-harvest fruit drop by 61 -72% over the control in bothseasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea sprays at pea or marble stage significantly increased vegetative growth.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays ofurea or 2, 4-D alone at pea or marble stage significantly increased vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D sprays at pea or marble stage significantly increased vegetative growth.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-De0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar sprays ofurea or 2, 4-D alone at pea or marble stage significantly increased vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D alone increased fruit retention and decreased fruit drop after June drop.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-D alonee0
Outcome
fruit retentione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar sprays of 2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compounds at pea or marble stagesignificantly increased fruit retention and decreased fruit drop after June drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D with calcium compounds increased fruit retention.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compoundse0
Outcome
fruit retentione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar sprays of 2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compounds at pea or marble stagesignificantly increased fruit retention and decreased fruit drop after June drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D alone decreased fruit drop after June drop.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-D alonee0
Outcome
fruit drop after June drope0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar sprays of 2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compounds at pea or marble stagesignificantly increased fruit retention and decreased fruit drop after June drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D with calcium compounds decreased fruit drop after June drop.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compoundse0
Outcome
fruit drop after June drope0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar sprays of 2, 4-D alone or with the different calcium compounds at pea or marble stagesignificantly increased fruit retention and decreased fruit drop after June drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid at pea stage increased final fruit retention by 23–69% over control.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
boric acide0
Outcome
Final fruit retentione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23 - 69%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final fruit retentionwas increased (23 - 69% over the control) and pre-harvest fruit drop was decreased (63 to 100%compared to the control) by spraying boric acid or 2, 4-D alone at the pea stage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D at pea stage increased final fruit retention by 23–69% over control.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-De0
Outcome
Final fruit retentione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23 - 69%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final fruit retentionwas increased (23 - 69% over the control) and pre-harvest fruit drop was decreased (63 to 100%compared to the control) by spraying boric acid or 2, 4-D alone at the pea stage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid at pea stage decreased preharvest fruit drop by 63–100% against control.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
boric acide0
Outcome
pre-harvest fruit drope0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
63 to 100%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final fruit retentionwas increased (23 - 69% over the control) and pre-harvest fruit drop was decreased (63 to 100%compared to the control) by spraying boric acid or 2, 4-D alone at the pea stage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D at pea stage decreased preharvest fruit drop by 63–100% against control.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
2, 4-De0
Outcome
pre-harvest fruit drope0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
63 to 100%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final fruit retentionwas increased (23 - 69% over the control) and pre-harvest fruit drop was decreased (63 to 100%compared to the control) by spraying boric acid or 2, 4-D alone at the pea stage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium superphosphate at marble stage increased final fruit retention by 33 - 7%.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
calcium superphosphate alone at the marble stagee0
Outcome
final fruitretentione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33 - 7%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying calcium superphosphate alone at the marble stage caused an increase in final fruitretention by 33 - 7% and a decrease in pre-harvest fruit drop by 61 -72% over the control in bothseasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium superphosphate at marble stage decreased preharvest fruit drop by 61 -72%.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
calcium superphosphate alone at the marble stagee0
Outcome
pre-harvest fruit drope0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
61 -72%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying calcium superphosphate alone at the marble stage caused an increase in final fruitretention by 33 - 7% and a decrease in pre-harvest fruit drop by 61 -72% over the control in bothseasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washington Navel orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.