Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

In-vitro micrografting technique in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) cv. Blood Red to produce virus free plants

JYOTI KANWAR; M K KAUL; I S NARUKA; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the potential use and applicability of micrografting technique for the development of virus free nursery in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) cv. Blood Red Malta. The micro grafting was carried out using 11-20 days old etiolated seedlings of Rough Lemon, Sour orange, Carrizo and Karna Khatta rootstocks. An apical meristem (1-2 mm) having 3-leaf primordial (0.3-0.5 mm) were taken from the axillary proliferated nodal segments. Finely excised meristems were placed on aseptically grown rootstocks making an inverted 'T' incision in vitro. Micro grafts were inoculated on MS media added with different Plant Growth Regulators, i.e. IAA, NAA and 2,4-D each under varied concentrations (control, 0.1 ppm, 0.5 ppm, 1.0 ppm , 1.5 ppm, 2.0 and 3.0 ppm). Highest grafts success (60%) was recorded when 13 days old Carrizo seedlings were used as rootstock. Among all the treatments, scion treated with 2,4-D at 3.0 mg/l exerted maximum positive effect on the success of STG (70.00%). Overall, Sweet orange cv. Blood Red, micro grafted on Carrizo rootstock culturing on liquid MS media containing 2, 4-D at 3.0 mg/L resulted maximum success and growth of grafts. Successful micrografts were hardened under controlled conditions and further shifted in insect proof net house to develop disease free mother progeny.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrizo rootstock at 13 days gave the highest graft success of 60%.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
13 days old Carrizo seedlingse0
Outcome
grafts successe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grafts success (60%) was recorded when 13 days old Carrizo seedlings were used as rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion treatment with 2,4-D at 3.0 mg/l maximized shoot tip grafting success at 70.00%.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Organ / stage
scione0
Treatment
2,4-D at 3.0 mg/le0
Outcome
success of STGe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
70.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“scion treated with 2,4-D at 3.0 mg/l exerted maximum positive effect on the success of STG (70.00%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blood Red sweet orange grafted on Carrizo in liquid MS media with 2, 4-D at 3.0 mg/L had maximum graft success and growth.

Taxon
Sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Material
Blood Rede0
Treatment
micro grafted on Carrizo rootstock culturing on liquid MS media containing 2, 4-D at 3.0 mg/Le0
Outcome
success and growth of graftse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet orange cv. Blood Red, micro grafted on Carrizo rootstock culturing on liquid MS media containing 2, 4-D at 3.0 mg/L resulted maximum success and growth of grafts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successful micrografts were hardened and moved to an insect proof net house for disease-free mother progeny.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
disease free mother progenye0
Setting
insect proof net housee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Successful micrografts were hardened under controlled conditions and further shifted in insect proof net house to develop disease free mother progeny.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–66 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

in vitro · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.