Paper · 1999 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Comparison of growth and15nitrogen recovery between direct seeded flooded and transplanted rice at early growth stage under conventional and delayed planting

Rodolfo S. Escabarte; Ho Ando; Ken-ichi Kakuda

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the tropics, broadcast seeded flooded rice (BSFR) was found to show a higher 15N recovery than transplanted rice (TPR) under the same fertilizer N management conditions mainly due to the higher initial growth rate at early stages as a result of the lack of transplanting shock.This study was conducted to compare the growth characteristics and 15N recovery at early growth stages between BSFR and TPR under conventional and delayed (low and high temperatures) planting environment in Japan.Under both planting environments, BSFR produced a larger number of tillers m-2 (600-700) than TPR (420-450) at the middle growth stage (89 d after seeding, DAS).However, TPR showed a larger crop dry weight accumulation at either planting time resulting in a higher total plant N uptake.Irrespective of the cropping method and time, dry weight was exponentially correlated with the plant uptake while 15N recovery showed a curvilinear relation to the N uptake.Under conventional planting, TPR showed a higher basal 15N recovery (ranging from 23-28%) than BSFR (13-16%) in 1996 while the values were 24-26% for TPR and 14-23% for BSFR in 1997 during the maximum tiller (60-69 DAS) to panicle formation stages (85-89 DAS).Under delayed planting, still TPR showed a higher average basal 15N recovery (28%) than BSFR (23%) at the same stages as those mentioned above.These results suggest that regardless of planting time in Japan, TPR exhibited a higher initial growth rate than BSFR resulting in higher use efficiency of both soil and fertilizer N at the early growth stages.Key Words: broadcast-seeded flooded rice

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSFR had more tillers than TPR at 89 days.

Organ / stage
middle growth stagee0
Treatment
BSFRe0
Outcome
number of tillers m-2e0
Direction
largere0
Value
600-700e0
Comparator
TPRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BSFR produced a larger number of tillers m-2 (600-700) than TPR (420-450) at the middle growth stage (89 d after seeding, DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPR had greater crop dry weight accumulation at either planting time.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
crop dry weight accumulatione0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
at either planting timee0
Comparator
BSFRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPR showed a larger crop dry weight accumulation at either planting time resulting in a higher total plant N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“BSFR produced a larger number of tillers m-2 (600-700) than TPR (420-450) at the middle growth stage (89 d after seeding, DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPR had higher total plant N uptake.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
total plant N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
BSFRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPR showed a larger crop dry weight accumulation at either planting time resulting in a higher total plant N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“BSFR produced a larger number of tillers m-2 (600-700) than TPR (420-450) at the middle growth stage (89 d after seeding, DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–653 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight was exponentially correlated with plant uptake.

Organ / stage
plante0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Qualifier
exponentially correlated with the plant uptakee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of the cropping method and time, dry weight was exponentially correlated with the plant uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15N recovery had a curvilinear relation to N uptake.

Treatment
N uptakee0
Outcome
15N recoverye0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15N recovery showed a curvilinear relation to the N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPR had higher basal 15N recovery than BSFR in 1996.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
basal 15N recoverye0
Direction
highere0
Value
23-28%e0
Qualifier
13-16%e0
Comparator
BSFRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPR showed a higher basal 15N recovery (ranging from 23-28%) than BSFR (13-16%) in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1997 TPR basal recovery was 24-26% versus 14-23% for BSFR.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
basal 15N recoverye1
Value
24-26%e0
Qualifier
14-23%e0
Comparator
BSFRe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the values were 24-26% for TPR and 14-23% for BSFR in 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“TPR showed a higher basal 15N recovery (ranging from 23-28%) than BSFR (13-16%) in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under delayed planting TPR had higher average basal recovery than BSFR.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
average basal 15N recoverye0
Direction
highere0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
23%e0
Comparator
BSFRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under delayed planting, still TPR showed a higher average basal 15N recovery (28%) than BSFR (23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred higher initial growth rate in TPR.

Treatment
TPRe0
Outcome
initial growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
BSFRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPR exhibited a higher initial growth rate than BSFR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred higher soil and fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency in TPR.

Treatment
TPRe1
Outcome
use efficiency of both soil and fertilizer Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
BSFRe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher use efficiency of both soil and fertilizer N at the early growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1564 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“BSFR produced a larger number of tillers m-2 (600-700) than TPR (420-450) at the middle growth stage (89 d after seeding, DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–653 · show in text ↑

transplanting · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 76 positive, 7 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.