Paper · 1980 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of the Hydrogenase System in Rhizobium japonicum on the Nitrogen Fixation and Growth of Soybeans at Different Stages of Development1

R. M. Zablotowicz; S. A. Russell; H. J. Evans

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The process of N fixation is energy consuming and inefficient. In most cases 20 to 40% of the energy that is supplied to nitrogenase for the reduction of N 2 is utilized for the reduction of protons to H 2 . Some strains of R. japonicum contain a membrane‐bound hydrogenase that is capable of oxidizing all of the H 2 that is produced during N 2 fixation. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of inoculation of soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] with Rhizobium japonicum containing H 2 recycling capability on N fixation efficiency and soybean yield at various physiological stages of growth. In these experiments, a H 2 ‐oxidizing strain SR (Hup + ) and SR3 (Hup − ), a mutant derived from SR which is unable to oxidize H 2 , were utilized. Soybeans cv. ‘Wilkin’ were grown under bacteriological conditions utilizing a drip‐irrigated nutriculture system. Nodules from plants inoculated with SR evolved no measurable amount of H 2 , while nodules from plants innoculated with SR3 evolved between 2.7 and 10 µ moles of H 2 /g nodules/ hour depending upon physiological age. Acetylene reduction rates by strain SR were significantly higher than those of nodules formed from SR3 during the vegetative, late pod‐fill, and leaf senescence stage of growth, respectively. Dry matter accumulation was significantly higher in plants inoculated with SR than in plants inoculated with SR3 (31% increase during vegetative stage, 25% during flowering, and 27% during pod‐fill stage). Nitrogen contents of shoots and seeds were significantly higher in plants inoculated with strain SR, demonstrating increased N fixation by nodules formed by Hup + Rhizobium . Our results support the conclusion that strains of R. japonicum selected for inoculation purposes should contain H 2 ‐oxidizing capability as one of their desired characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SR-inoculated plants had no measurable nodule hydrogen evolution.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
inoculated with SRe0
Interactor
SRe0symbiont
Outcome
H 2e0
Direction
no measurable amounte0

Verbatim

e0

“Nodules from plants inoculated with SR evolved no measurable amount of H 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SR3-inoculated plants had nodule hydrogen evolution of 2.7 to 10 µ moles per gram per hour.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
innoculated with SR3e0
Interactor
SR3e0symbiont
Outcome
H 2e0
Value
2.7 and 10 µ moles of H 2 /g nodules/ houre0

Verbatim

e0

“nodules from plants innoculated with SR3 evolved between 2.7 and 10 µ moles of H 2 /g nodules/ hour depending upon physiological age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction was significantly higher for SR than SR3 nodules at the reported growth stages.

Taxon
nodulese0
Treatment
strain SRe0
Interactor
SRe0symbiont
Outcome
Acetylene reduction ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SR3e0

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates by strain SR were significantly higher than those of nodules formed from SR3 during the vegetative, late pod‐fill, and leaf senescence stage of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SR inoculation increased dry matter accumulation 31% during vegetative growth versus SR3.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Treatment
inoculated with SRe0
Interactor
SRe0symbiont
Outcome
Dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
31%e0
Comparator
inoculated with SR3e0

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter accumulation was significantly higher in plants inoculated with SR than in plants inoculated with SR3 (31% increase during vegetative stage, 25% during flowering, and 27% during pod‐fill stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SR inoculation increased dry matter accumulation 25% during flowering versus SR3.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
inoculated with SRe0
Interactor
SRe0symbiont
Outcome
Dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
inoculated with SR3e0

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter accumulation was significantly higher in plants inoculated with SR than in plants inoculated with SR3 (31% increase during vegetative stage, 25% during flowering, and 27% during pod‐fill stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SR inoculation increased dry matter accumulation 27% during pod fill versus SR3.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Organ / stage
pod‐fill stagee0
Treatment
inoculated with SRe0
Interactor
SRe0symbiont
Outcome
Dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
inoculated with SR3e0

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter accumulation was significantly higher in plants inoculated with SR than in plants inoculated with SR3 (31% increase during vegetative stage, 25% during flowering, and 27% during pod‐fill stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SR inoculation produced significantly higher shoot and seed nitrogen contents than SR3.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
inoculated with strain SRe0
Interactor
SRe0symbiont
Outcome
Nitrogen contents of shoots and seedse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen contents of shoots and seeds were significantly higher in plants inoculated with strain SR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1591 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend hydrogen-oxidizing capability in R. japonicum inoculation strains.

Interactor
R. japonicume0symbiont
Outcome
should contain H 2 ‐oxidizing capabilitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“strains of R. japonicum selected for inoculation purposes should contain H 2 ‐oxidizing capability as one of their desired characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1845 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.