Paper · 2000 · Physiologia Plantarum

Sucrose metabolism in spring and winter wheat in response to high irradiance, cold stress and cold acclimation

Leonid V. Savitch; Tracy Harney; Norman P. A. Huner

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
103
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of low‐temperature stress, cold acclimation and growth at high irradiance in a spring ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Katepwa) and a winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Monopol) were examined in leaves and crowns with respect to the sucrose utilisation and carbon allocation. Light‐saturated and carbon dioxide (CO 2 )‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation were decreased by 50% in cold‐stressed spring and winter wheat cultivars. Cold‐ or high light‐acclimated Katepwa spring wheat maintained light‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation comparable to those of control spring wheat. In contrast, cold‐ or high light‐acclimated winter wheat maintained higher light and CO 2 ‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation than non‐acclimated controls. In leaves, during either cold stress, cold acclimation or acclimation to high irradiance, the sucrose/starch ratio increased by 5‐ to 10‐fold and neutral invertase activity increased by 2‐ to 2.5‐fold in both the spring and the winter wheat. In contrast, Monopol winter wheat, but not Katepwa spring wheat, exhibited a 3‐fold increase in leaf sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity, a 4‐fold increase in sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferase activity and a 6.6‐fold increase in acid invertase upon cold acclimation. Although leaves of cold‐stressed and high light‐grown spring and winter wheat showed 2.3‐ to 7‐fold higher sucrose levels than controls, these plants exhibited a limited capacity to adjust either sucrose phosphate synthase or sucrose synthase activity (SS[s]). In addition, the acclimation to high light resulted in a 23–31% lower starch abundance and no changes at the level of fructan accumulation in leaves of either winter or spring wheat when compared with controls. However, high light‐acclimated winter wheat exhibited a 1.8‐fold higher neutral invertase activity and high light‐acclimated spring wheat exhibited an induction of SS(d) activity when compared with controls. Crowns of Monopol showed higher fructan accumulation than Katepwa upon cold and high light acclimation. We suggest that the differential adjustment of CO 2 ‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation upon cold acclimation in Monopol winter wheat, as compared with Katepwa spring wheat, is associated with the increased capacity of Monopol for sucrose utilisation through the biosynthesis of fructans in the leaves and subsequent export to the crowns. In contrast, the differential adjustment of CO 2 ‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation upon high light acclimation of Monopol appears to be associated with both increased fructan and starch accumulation in the crowns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold stress decreased light- and CO2-saturated assimilation by 50% in both wheat cultivars.

Treatment
cold‐stressede0
Outcome
rates of CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Light‐saturated and carbon dioxide (CO 2 )‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation were decreased by 50% in cold‐stressed spring and winter wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold or high-light acclimated spring wheat maintained light-saturated assimilation comparable to control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Katepwae0
Treatment
Cold‐ or high light‐acclimatede0
Outcome
light‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
control spring wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cold‐ or high light‐acclimated Katepwa spring wheat maintained light‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation comparable to those of control spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold or high-light acclimated winter wheat maintained higher light- and CO2-saturated assimilation than controls.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
cold‐ or high light‐acclimatede0
Outcome
light and CO 2 ‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non‐acclimated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“cold‐ or high light‐acclimated winter wheat maintained higher light and CO 2 ‐saturated rates of CO 2 assimilation than non‐acclimated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold stress, cold acclimation or high light raised leaf sucrose/starch ratio 5- to 10-fold in both wheats.

Organ / stage
springe0
Treatment
cold stress, cold acclimation or acclimation to high irradiancee0
Outcome
sucrose/starch ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5‐ to 10‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“during either cold stress, cold acclimation or acclimation to high irradiance, the sucrose/starch ratio increased by 5‐ to 10‐fold and neutral invertase activity increased by 2‐ to 2.5‐fold in both the spring and the winter wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those treatments raised leaf neutral invertase activity 2- to 2.5-fold in both wheats.

Treatment
cold stress, cold acclimation or acclimation to high irradiancee0
Gene
neutral invertasee0
Outcome
neutral invertase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2‐ to 2.5‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“during either cold stress, cold acclimation or acclimation to high irradiance, the sucrose/starch ratio increased by 5‐ to 10‐fold and neutral invertase activity increased by 2‐ to 2.5‐fold in both the spring and the winter wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold acclimation raised Monopol winter wheat sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity by 3‐fold.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Monopole0
Treatment
cold acclimatione0
Gene
sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS)e0
Outcome
sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Monopol winter wheat, but not Katepwa spring wheat, exhibited a 3‐fold increase in leaf sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity, a 4‐fold increase in sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferase activity and a 6.6‐fold increase in acid invertase upon cold acclimation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold acclimation raised Monopol winter wheat sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferase activity by 4‐fold.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Monopole0
Treatment
cold acclimatione0
Gene
sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferasee0
Outcome
sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferase activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Monopol winter wheat, but not Katepwa spring wheat, exhibited a 3‐fold increase in leaf sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity, a 4‐fold increase in sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferase activity and a 6.6‐fold increase in acid invertase upon cold acclimation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold acclimation raised Monopol winter wheat acid invertase by 6.6‐fold.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Monopole0
Treatment
cold acclimatione0
Gene
acid invertasee0
Outcome
acid invertasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.6‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Monopol winter wheat, but not Katepwa spring wheat, exhibited a 3‐fold increase in leaf sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity, a 4‐fold increase in sucrose:sucrose fructosyl transferase activity and a 6.6‐fold increase in acid invertase upon cold acclimation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold-stressed and high-light grown wheat leaves had 2.3- to 7-fold higher sucrose than controls.

Treatment
cold‐stressed and high light‐growne0
Outcome
sucrose levelse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.3‐ to 7‐folde0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaves of cold‐stressed and high light‐grown spring and winter wheat showed 2.3‐ to 7‐fold higher sucrose levels than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-light acclimation lowered wheat leaf starch abundance by 23–31%.

Treatment
high lighte0
Outcome
starch abundancee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
23–31%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“high light resulted in a 23–31% lower starch abundance and no changes at the level of fructan accumulation in leaves of either winter or spring wheat when compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light did not change leaf fructan accumulation in either wheat type.

Treatment
high lighte0
Outcome
fructan accumulatione0
Direction
no changese0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“high light resulted in a 23–31% lower starch abundance and no changes at the level of fructan accumulation in leaves of either winter or spring wheat when compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-light acclimated winter wheat had 1.8-fold higher neutral invertase activity than controls.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
high light‐acclimatede0
Gene
neutral invertasee0
Outcome
neutral invertase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.8‐folde0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“high light‐acclimated winter wheat exhibited a 1.8‐fold higher neutral invertase activity and high light‐acclimated spring wheat exhibited an induction of SS(d) activity when compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-light acclimated spring wheat induced SS(d) activity versus controls.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
high light‐acclimatede0
Gene
SS(d)e0
Outcome
SS(d) activitye0
Direction
inductione0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“high light‐acclimated winter wheat exhibited a 1.8‐fold higher neutral invertase activity and high light‐acclimated spring wheat exhibited an induction of SS(d) activity when compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1944 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monopol crowns accumulated more fructan than Katepwa after cold and high-light acclimation.

Taxon
Monopole0
Material
Monopole0
Organ / stage
Crownse0
Treatment
cold and high light acclimatione0
Outcome
fructan accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Katepwae0

Verbatim

t0

“spring and winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crowns of Monopol showed higher fructan accumulation than Katepwa upon cold and high light acclimation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2048 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 11 positive, 16 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 14 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 16 positive, 23 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.