Paper · 1982 · Agronomy Journal

Placement of Nitrogen Fertilizers for No‐Till and Conventional Till Corn1

D. B. Mengel; D. W. Nelson; D. M. Huber

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
132
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract High rates of N loss have been observed from N fertilizers applied directly on the surface in no‐till corn ( Zea mays L.) production systems. Field experiments were conducted at four locations over a three‐year period to determine what effects N source and N placement had on N losses in both no‐till and conventional till corn production systems. Soils used were: Stoy loam, an Aquic Hapludalf; Clermont silt loam, a Typic Ochraqualf; Avonberg silt loam, an Aeric Fragiaqualf; Chalmers silty clay loam, a Typic Argiaquoll; and Lyles fine sandy loam, a Typic Haplaquoll. Nitrogen sources used were anhydrous ammonia (NH 3 ), urea‐ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN), solid urea and solid ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ). Placement variables used were injection of NH 3 and UAN 20 cm below the soil surface and broadcasting UAN, urea and NH 4 NO 3 on the soil surface with no incorporation. Nitrogen rates used were 0 and 165 kg N/ha. Injecting NH 3 , or UAN below the surface resulted in consistently higher corn grain yields than applying UAN, NH 4 NO 3 or urea directly on the soil‐residue surface. Percent N in leaf and grain also reflected an increase in N use efficiency with subsurface N placement. Percent N in leaf was significantly higher where NH 3 or UAN were injected as compared to UAN or urea surface applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface NH 3 injection produced higher corn grain yields than surface-applied fertilizers.

Treatment
Injecting NH 3e0
Outcome
corn grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
applying UAN, NH 4 NO 3 or urea directly on the soil‐residue surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injecting NH 3 , or UAN below the surface resulted in consistently higher corn grain yields than applying UAN, NH 4 NO 3 or urea directly on the soil‐residue surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface UAN injection produced higher corn grain yields than surface-applied fertilizers.

Treatment
UAN below the surfacee0
Outcome
corn grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
applying UAN, NH 4 NO 3 or urea directly on the soil‐residue surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injecting NH 3 , or UAN below the surface resulted in consistently higher corn grain yields than applying UAN, NH 4 NO 3 or urea directly on the soil‐residue surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface nitrogen placement increased nitrogen-use efficiency as reflected by leaf and grain nitrogen percentages.

Organ / stage
leaf and graine0
Treatment
subsurface N placemente0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent N in leaf and grain also reflected an increase in N use efficiency with subsurface N placement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected NH 3 gave significantly higher leaf nitrogen percentage than surface UAN or urea.

Treatment
NH 3e0
Outcome
Percent N in leafe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
UAN or urea surface appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent N in leaf was significantly higher where NH 3 or UAN were injected as compared to UAN or urea surface applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected UAN gave significantly higher leaf nitrogen percentage than surface UAN or urea.

Treatment
UAN were injectede0
Outcome
Percent N in leafe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
UAN or urea surface appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent N in leaf was significantly higher where NH 3 or UAN were injected as compared to UAN or urea surface applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–72 · show in text ↑

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.