Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Effects of Copper Sources on Wheat and Soybeans Grown on Organic Soils1

J. S. Barnes; F. R. Cox

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Optimum rates for and the residual effects of several new copper fertilizer materials have not been determined. Because the copper in these sources is complexed, usually with an organic ligand, it has been implied that they are more effective than copper sulfate. The immediate and residual effectiveness of copper sulfate and several new chelated and/or complexed copper materials were compared to determine the optimum rate of application for each source. Field experiments were conducted on four acid, organic soils, each of which was severely deficient in copper. Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yields were increased with an increase in the rate applied to 2.8 kg Cu/ha at three locations and to 5.6 kg Cu/ha at the fourth. There was no difference in the nature of the response obtained among sources so all sources were considered equally effective when equivalent amounts of copper were used. Soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were double‐cropped behind wheat to determine the residual effect of these sources. Grain yields showed the same patterns of response to copper sources as were obtained with wheat. Plant analyses also revealed the same effects of copper applications as were obtained with grain yields. Distinct symptoms of copper deficiency developed in the control and low copper treatments in both crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased with copper rate up to 2.8 kg Cu/ha at three sites and 5.6 kg Cu/ha at the fourth.

Treatment
increase in the rate applied to 2.8 kg Cu/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.8 kg Cu/hae0
Qualifier
5.6 kg Cu/ha at the fourthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yields were increased with an increase in the rate applied to 2.8 kg Cu/ha at three locations and to 5.6 kg Cu/ha at the fourth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sources produced the same wheat response at equivalent copper amounts.

Treatment
sourcese0
Outcome
response obtainede0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
equivalent amounts of coppere0
Comparator
all sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in the nature of the response obtained among sources so all sources were considered equally effective when equivalent amounts of copper were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield followed the same copper-source response pattern as wheat.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
copper sourcese0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields showed the same patterns of response to copper sources as were obtained with wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant analyses showed the same copper effects as grain yields.

Taxon
Wheat and SoybeansGlycine maxTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
copper applicationse0
Outcome
Plant analysese0
Comparator
grain yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant analyses also revealed the same effects of copper applications as were obtained with grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper deficiency symptoms developed in wheat and soybean controls and low copper treatments.

Taxon
Wheat and SoybeansGlycine maxTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
low copper treatmentse0
Outcome
symptoms of copper deficiencye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Distinct symptoms of copper deficiency developed in the control and low copper treatments in both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.