Paper · 1985 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil

Robert K. Belford; Robert Q. Cannell; Robert J. Thomson

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The response of winter wheat to surface waterlogging in monoliths of clay soil in lysimeters was studied. The treatments, selected as corresponding to the most extreme likely in Britain, were: 5 days of waterlogging in October between germination and emergence; 42 days of waterlogging during tillering in January and February; and 21 days from mid‐April during stem elongation. These treatments were used singly and in all combinations and were compared with a freely‐drained control. During waterlogging, the oxygen concentration in the soil declined most rapidly when the soil was warmer (in October and April) and at the shallower depths (5, 20cm): also, a decrease in soil solution nitrate was accompanied by an increase in nitrous oxide evolution. Pre‐emergence waterlogging restricted plant population to 35 m −2 compared to 338 m −2 under free drainage. Subsequently, compensatory growth resulted from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light: a greater proportion of tillers survived and the flag leaves were larger, although ears at harvest were fewer in all treatments waterlogged before emergence. After waterlogging during tillering, grain loss was accounted for entirely by a decrease in the number of ear‐bearing tillers. After waterlogging during stem elongation, yield losses were associated primarily with fewer grains per spikelet. Grain yield was depressed by about 4–12% after single waterloggings, by 20% after any two waterloggings, and by 32% when plants were waterlogged on all three occasions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence waterlogging restricted winter wheat plant population to 35 m-2 compared with 338 m-2 under free drainage.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
plant populatione1
Direction
restrictede1
Value
35 m −2e1
Qualifier
338 m −2e1
Comparator
free drainagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pre‐emergence waterlogging restricted plant population to 35 m −2 compared to 338 m −2 under free drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen concentration in the soil declined most rapidly during waterlogging when the soil was warmer and at shallower depths.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge2
Outcome
oxygen concentration in the soile2
Direction
declined most rapidlye2
Qualifier
when the soil was warmere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“During waterlogging, the oxygen concentration in the soil declined most rapidly when the soil was warmer (in October and April) and at the shallower depths (5, 20cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–660 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A decrease in soil solution nitrate during waterlogging was accompanied by an increase in nitrous oxide evolution.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Compound
soil solution nitratee3
Outcome
nitrous oxide evolutione3
Direction
increasee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“a decrease in soil solution nitrate was accompanied by an increase in nitrous oxide evolution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging before emergence gave a greater proportion of surviving tillers.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogged before emergencee4
Outcome
proportion of tillers survivede4
Direction
greatere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Subsequently, compensatory growth resulted from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light: a greater proportion of tillers survived and the flag leaves were larger, although ears at harvest were fewer in all treatments waterlogged before emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging before emergence left the flag leaves larger.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogged before emergencee4
Outcome
flag leavese4
Direction
largere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Subsequently, compensatory growth resulted from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light: a greater proportion of tillers survived and the flag leaves were larger, although ears at harvest were fewer in all treatments waterlogged before emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging before emergence gave fewer ears at harvest in all treatments.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogged before emergencee4
Outcome
ears at harveste4
Direction
fewere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Subsequently, compensatory growth resulted from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light: a greater proportion of tillers survived and the flag leaves were larger, although ears at harvest were fewer in all treatments waterlogged before emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1140 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Compensatory growth after early waterlogging results from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
compensatory growthe4
Qualifier
diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and lighte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Subsequently, compensatory growth resulted from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light: a greater proportion of tillers survived and the flag leaves were larger, although ears at harvest were fewer in all treatments waterlogged before emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After waterlogging during tillering, grain loss was accounted for entirely by fewer ear-bearing tillers.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogging during tilleringe5
Outcome
number of ear‐bearing tillerse5
Direction
decreasee5
Qualifier
grain loss was accounted for entirely bye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“After waterlogging during tillering, grain loss was accounted for entirely by a decrease in the number of ear‐bearing tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After waterlogging during stem elongation, yield losses were associated with fewer grains per spikelet.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogging during stem elongatione6
Outcome
grains per spikelete6
Direction
fewere6
Qualifier
yield losses were associated primarily withe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“After waterlogging during stem elongation, yield losses were associated primarily with fewer grains per spikelet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single waterlogging depressed grain yield by about 4–12%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
single waterloggingse7
Outcome
Grain yielde7
Direction
depressede7
Value
4–12%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain yield was depressed by about 4–12% after single waterloggings, by 20% after any two waterloggings, and by 32% when plants were waterlogged on all three occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Any two waterloggings depressed grain yield by 20%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
any two waterloggingse7
Outcome
Grain yielde7
Direction
depressede7
Value
20%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain yield was depressed by about 4–12% after single waterloggings, by 20% after any two waterloggings, and by 32% when plants were waterlogged on all three occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging on all three occasions depressed grain yield by 32%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogged on all three occasionse7
Outcome
Grain yielde7
Direction
depressede7
Value
32%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain yield was depressed by about 4–12% after single waterloggings, by 20% after any two waterloggings, and by 32% when plants were waterlogged on all three occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1550 · show in text ↑

flooding · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

flooding · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 17 positive, 85 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 84 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.