Paper · 1981 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Increase in Internode Length of Phaseolus lunatus L. Caused by Inoculation with a Nitrate Reductase-deficient Strain of Rhizobium sp.

Eric W. Triplett; James J. Heitholt; Kathleen B. Evensen; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Dramatic differences in the height of lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus L.) treated with two different Rhizobium strains were studied. Lima beans were grown in Perlite in the greenhouse or in a minus-N culture solution in the growth chamber. The plants were inoculated with either Rhizobium sp. (lima bean) strain 127E15, which contains the constitutive nitrate reductase activity, or strain 127E14, which lacks that activity. For up to 3 weeks, no growth differences were observed in the plants inoculated with either strain. Five weeks after inoculation, however, those plants inoculated with strain 127E14 were significantly taller and had a larger number of leaves than those inoculated with strain 127E15. The difference in plant height was the result of increased internode elongation caused by inoculation with Rhizobium sp. 127E14. This response was observed with all lima bean cultivars tested, including Henderson, Fordhook, Allgreen, and Early Thorogreen. The growth difference occurred in plants cultured in the greenhouse or in the growth chamber.No differences were observed in fresh weights of nodules, roots, axes, leaves, or flowers. The number of nodules, pods, or flowers also did not differ. Acetylene reduction rates and total N content were equal in plants inoculated with strains 127E14 or 127E15.Inasmuch as only internode length and leaf number differed between Rhizobium treatments, the response appeared to be hormone-mediated. Application of gibberellic acid to the apex of plants inoculated with strain 127E15 caused an increase in plant height similar to that observed in untreated plants inoculated with strain 127E14. Conversely, the height of plants infected with strain 127E14 was decreased by application of gibberellin synthesis inhibitors to the root system. These data suggest that the increased growth caused by inoculation with strain 127E14 could be the result of increased gibberellin synthesis in lima bean nodules infected with that strain. Whether this response was related to the absence of nitrate reductase activity in strain 127E14 is unknown.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth did not differ between strain treatments for up to three weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
straine0
Outcome
growth differencese0
Direction
no growth differencese0
Qualifier
up to 3 weekse0
Comparator
either straine0

Verbatim

e0

“For up to 3 weeks, no growth differences were observed in the plants inoculated with either strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At five weeks 127E14 inoculation produced taller plants than 127E15.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
strain 127E14e0
Interactor
strain 127E14e0symbiont
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Qualifier
Five weeks after inoculatione0
Comparator
strain 127E15e0

Verbatim

e0

“Five weeks after inoculation, however, those plants inoculated with strain 127E14 were significantly taller and had a larger number of leaves than those inoculated with strain 127E15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At five weeks 127E14 inoculation produced more leaves than 127E15.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
strain 127E14e0
Interactor
strain 127E14e0symbiont
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
strain 127E15e0

Verbatim

e0

“Five weeks after inoculation, however, those plants inoculated with strain 127E14 were significantly taller and had a larger number of leaves than those inoculated with strain 127E15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–705 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater plant height resulted from increased internode elongation under 127E14 inoculation.

Taxon
lima beanPhaseolus lunatust0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. 127E14e0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Qualifier
increased internode elongatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in plant height was the result of increased internode elongation caused by inoculation with Rhizobium sp. 127E14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weights of nodules, roots, axes, leaves and flowers did not differ between strain treatments.

Taxon
lima beanPhaseolus lunatust0
Treatment
Rhizobium treatmentse1
Outcome
fresh weights of nodules, roots, axes, leaves, or flowerse0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were observed in fresh weights of nodules, roots, axes, leaves, or flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“between Rhizobium treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule, pod and flower numbers did not differ between strain treatments.

Taxon
lima beanPhaseolus lunatust0
Treatment
Rhizobium treatmentse1
Outcome
number of nodules, pods, or flowerse0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of nodules, pods, or flowers also did not differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“between Rhizobium treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction rates and total N content were equal under both strains.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
strains 127E14e0
Interactor
strains 127E14e0symbiont
Outcome
Acetylene reduction rates and total N contente0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
127E15e0

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates and total N content were equal in plants inoculated with strains 127E14 or 127E15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid applied to 127E15 plants increased height similarly to untreated 127E14 plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
gibberellic acide0
Interactor
strain 127E15e0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated plants inoculated with strain 127E14e0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of gibberellic acid to the apex of plants inoculated with strain 127E15 caused an increase in plant height similar to that observed in untreated plants inoculated with strain 127E14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin synthesis inhibitors reduced height of plants inoculated with 127E14.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
gibberellin synthesis inhibitorse0
Interactor
strain 127E14e0symbiont
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“height of plants infected with strain 127E14 was decreased by application of gibberellin synthesis inhibitors to the root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1790 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest increased gibberellin synthesis in nodules could explain 127E14 induced growth.

Taxon
lima beanPhaseolus lunatuse0
Interactor
strain 127E14e0symbiont
Outcome
increased growthe0
Qualifier
increased gibberellin synthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased growth caused by inoculation with strain 127E14 could be the result of increased gibberellin synthesis in lima bean nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1953 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

class · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.