Paper · 1999 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Drilling Fluid Effects on Crop Growth and Iron and Zinc Availability

T. A. Bauder; K. A. Barbarick; J. F. Shanahan; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Waste drilling fluids are often land‐farmed following completion of an oil or gas well in Colorado. This material usually contains production water, bentonitic clays, formation cuttings, barite, Na compounds, and synthetic organic polymers. We investigated the effects of 5 to 60 dry g drilling fluid kg −1 soil on the growth and trace metal concentration of sorghum—sudangrass ( Sorghum bicolor L. Moench ‘DeKalb ST‐6’— S. sudanense ) in the greenhouse. A nonlinear regression exponential‐rise model fit the increased plant total dry matter yield response to increasing drilling fluid rates. Increased plant tissue Fe concentration and uptake ( P < 0.05) indicated that increased plant‐available Fe was primarily responsible for the yield response, but increased Zn availability was also suspected. Results from a second greenhouse study confirmed that drilling fluid can also correct Zn deficiency in corn ( Zea mays L.). Soil SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) was higher with increasing drilling fluid, but was still <1. Other trace‐element concentrations in sudangrass tissue and soil pH and EC sat were not significantly increased due to application of drilling fluid. This study showed that application of controlled rates of water‐based drilling fluid from operations in Weld County, Colorado, was beneficial to the growth of sorghum—sudangrass and provided evidence that land application is an acceptable method of disposal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum—sudangrass total dry matter yield increased as drilling fluid rate increased, with an exponential-rise model fit.

Taxon
sorghum—sudangrassSorghumSorghum ×drummondiie1
Treatment
increasing drilling fluid ratese0
Outcome
plant total dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A nonlinear regression exponential‐rise model fit the increased plant total dry matter yield response to increasing drilling fluid rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“of sorghum—sudangrass (”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drilling fluid significantly increased plant tissue Fe concentration and uptake.

Taxon
sorghum—sudangrassSorghumSorghum ×drummondiie1
Treatment
drilling fluidt0
Outcome
plant tissue Fe concentration and uptakee0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased plant tissue Fe concentration and uptake ( P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drilling Fluid Effects on Crop Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“of sorghum—sudangrass (”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–388 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that increased Fe availability primarily drove the yield response.

Taxon
sorghum—sudangrassSorghumSorghum ×drummondiie1
Compound
Fee0
Outcome
yield responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased plant‐available Fe was primarily responsible for the yield response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“of sorghum—sudangrass (”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drilling fluid corrected Zn deficiency in corn in a second greenhouse study.

Treatment
drilling fluide0
Outcome
Zn deficiencye0
Direction
correcte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drilling fluid can also correct Zn deficiency in corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil SAR increased with drilling fluid rate but remained below 1.

Taxon
sorghum—sudangrassSorghumSorghum ×drummondiie1
Treatment
increasing drilling fluide0
Outcome
Soil SARe0
Direction
highere0
Value
<1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) was higher with increasing drilling fluid, but was still <1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“of sorghum—sudangrass (”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other trace-element concentrations in sudangrass tissue did not increase significantly after drilling fluid application.

Taxon
sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Treatment
drilling fluide0
Outcome
trace‐element concentrations in sudangrass tissuee0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other trace‐element concentrations in sudangrass tissue and soil pH and EC sat were not significantly increased due to application of drilling fluid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and saturated extract EC did not increase significantly after drilling fluid application.

Taxon
sorghum—sudangrassSorghumSorghum ×drummondiie1
Treatment
drilling fluide0
Outcome
soil pH and EC sate0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH and EC sat were not significantly increased due to application of drilling fluid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“of sorghum—sudangrass (”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–388 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled land application of water-based drilling fluid was beneficial for sorghum—sudangrass growth.

Taxon
sorghum—sudangrassSorghumSorghum ×drummondiie0
Outcome
application of controlled rates of water‐based drilling fluide0
Setting
Weld County, Coloradoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of controlled rates of water‐based drilling fluid from operations in Weld County, Colorado, was beneficial to the growth of sorghum—sudangrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1356 · show in text ↑

transplanting · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

transplanting · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

transplanting · yield · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.